Do you mean zaptel CVS? I have got the lastest version of zaptel from digium CVS. Could you explain it clear to me? I am newbie to this compilation things. Thanks! Is it kernel source problem or zaptel problem. I spent hours on google to find a clue , but in vain. Message: 3 Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:09:27 -0600 From: Eric Wieling aka ManxPower <eric@fnords.org> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] failed to compile zaptel on redhat (kernel 2.4.20-31.9) To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Message-ID: <41E95C57.8050208@fnords.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Update your CVS Xu, Duo wrote:> why linux/moduleparam.h is missing in the source? I > saw it in 2.6 source.__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Steven Critchfield
2005-Jan-15 21:29 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] failed to compile zaptel on redhat
linux/moduleparam.h is actually part of the kernel source. It is created when you config and compile the kernel. It holds the version symbols needed to properly link the new drivers into the kernel. I suggest you find a kernel compile howto that is at least understanding of anything specific to the brokenness of RedHat and follow the suggestions found within. On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 20:03 -0800, Xu, Duo wrote:> Do you mean zaptel CVS? I have got the lastest version > of zaptel from digium CVS. > > Could you explain it clear to me? I am newbie to this > compilation things. > > Thanks! > > Is it kernel source problem or zaptel problem. I spent > hours on google to find a clue , but in vain. > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:09:27 -0600 > From: Eric Wieling aka ManxPower <eric@fnords.org> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] failed to compile zaptel > on redhat > (kernel 2.4.20-31.9) > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial > Discussion > <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> > Message-ID: <41E95C57.8050208@fnords.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; > format=flowed > > Update your CVS > > Xu, Duo wrote: > > why linux/moduleparam.h is missing in the source? I > > saw it in 2.6 source. > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-- Steven Critchfield <critch@basesys.com>
On Sunday 16 January 2005 04:29, Steven Critchfield wrote:> linux/moduleparam.h is actually part of the kernel source. It is created > when you config and compile the kernel. It holds the version symbols > needed to properly link the new drivers into the kernel.No, it is part of the virgin kernel sources and defines the kernel modules parameters api. If he does not have it, then it looks like he does not have the full kernel sources installed.> I suggest you find a kernel compile howto that is at least understanding > of anything specific to the brokenness of RedHat and follow the > suggestions found within. >[...] > > Xu, Duo wrote: > > > why linux/moduleparam.h is missing in the source? I > > > saw it in 2.6 source.B