Low, Adam
2004-Feb-26 09:08 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] chan_sip support for SIP:Remote-Party-ID, specifically CLID priva cy
Hey All, I have a Cisco AS5300 running SIP against an Asterisk server with multiple C7940 phones. My issue is that from what I see in chan_sip.c there is no support for the Remote-Party-ID field in relation to withholding the calling partys number. This is a legal requirement for many countries and although it doesnt appear as an issue on the actual C7940 handsets when the Voicemail email is sent out it does contain the calling partys supposedly 'hidden' calling party id. Is this something planned to be added or perhaps a minor oversight ? Rgds, Adam Remote-Party-ID: <sip:16175881000@212.160.251.37>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off Remote-Party-ID: <sip:16175881000@212.160.251.37>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=full _____________________________________________________________ Adam J. Low Tel: +31 20 778 2740 Senior Network Architect Fax: +31 20 778 2600 Priority Telecom Corporate Email: alow@prioritytelecom.com ********* DISCLAIMER ********* This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure and may include proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any other person
Olle E. Johansson
2004-Feb-26 09:17 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] chan_sip support for SIP:Remote-Party-ID, specifically CLID priva cy
Low, Adam wrote:> Hey All, > > I have a Cisco AS5300 running SIP against an Asterisk server with multiple C7940 phones. > > My issue is that from what I see in chan_sip.c there is no support for the> Remote-Party-ID field in relation to withholding the calling partys number. > This is a legal requirement for many countries and although it doesnt appear as an Impressed. Does some countries have laws on SIP implementations? Wow. ;-)> Is this something planned to be added or perhaps a minor oversight ?If it's somethine planned to be added is really up to your (our someone else's) willingness to code... :-)> > Remote-Party-ID: <sip:16175881000@212.160.251.37>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off > Remote-Party-ID: <sip:16175881000@212.160.251.37>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=full >Could you please point me in direction of standard documents, drafts or documentation of this? /O