openssh unix dev - Apr 2002 - [Bug 222] configure finds getnameinfo() but not getaddrinfo()

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=222





------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org  2002-04-18 23:07 -------
Could you please try CVS -current with the following patch. You will need to
regenerate configure using autoconf.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=222





------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org  2002-04-18 23:08 -------
Created an attachment (id=83)
Fake HAVE_GETADDRINFO when [on]getaddrinfo exists




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=222





------- Additional Comments From cmadams at hiwaay.net  2002-04-19 00:37 -------
What compiler, CFLAGS, and configure options are you using to build
OpenSSH on Tru64?

The reason I ask is that I've used OpenSSH starting with (IIRC) 2.1 on
Tru64 4.0F, 4.0G, and now 5.1A, and I haven't had any trouble with what
you describe.  I've always compiled with "cc -std1", running
configure
like:

CC="cc -std1" ./configure <options here>



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=222





------- Additional Comments From urban at spielwiese.de  2002-04-19 10:28
-------
um...

I've tested the patch.  configure now finds [no]getaddrinfo(), but
HAVE_GETADDRINFO is still not getting set properly.  Here is an excerpt
from configure's output:

[...]
checking for getaddrinfo... no
checking for getcwd... yes
checking for getgrouplist... no
checking for getnameinfo... yes
[...]
checking for ngetaddrinfo... yes
checking for openpty... yes
checking for ogetaddrinfo... yes
[...]

from config.h:

/* Define to 1 if you have the `getaddrinfo' function. */
/* #undef HAVE_GETADDRINFO */

[...]

/* Define to 1 if you have the `getnameinfo' function. */
#define HAVE_GETNAMEINFO 1

[...]

Please let me know if I can do anything...



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=222





------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org  2002-04-19 15:38 -------
That shouldn't be a problem - have a look at the defines.h hunk of the
patch: we
define HAVE_GETADDRINFO if either of the replacement functions are found in
libc.

Does the patch work?



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=222

urban at spielwiese.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



------- Additional Comments From urban at spielwiese.de  2002-04-19 23:58
-------
umm, sorry about that.  Was a bit thick of me.

The patch works!  Thanks for your time.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=222





------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org  2002-04-23 20:30 -------
Actually, you should wait until the fix is committed before marking a bug
RESOLVED

The fix has just been committed anyway :)



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.