bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2008-May-16 02:42 UTC
[Bug 1464] New: "possible hijacking of X11-forwarded connections" bug has not been fixed completely
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1464 Summary: "possible hijacking of X11-forwarded connections" bug has not been fixed completely Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.0p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: security Priority: P5 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: sway2004009 at hotmail.com Hi OpenSSH team, I am still able to reproduce this problem with openssh50 code both on hpux. Seems like OpenSSH didn't fix this problem completely. how to reproduce: 1. root at sshpa4# uname -aHP-UX sshpa4 B.11.23 U 9000/800 3267743753 unlimited-user license 2. sshd_config X11Forwarding yesX11DisplayOffset 10X11UseLocalhost no // must not use "yes" to bind to localhost 3. /opt/ssh/sbin/sshd 4. log to sshpa4 from another terminal with normal user "sway" and start "nc" sway at sshpa4# /opt/netcat/bin/nc -l -p 6010 -v -v -s sshpa4.chn.hp.comlistening on [16.157.129.223] 6010 ... 5. logon to sshpa4 with another "leanne" with X11 forwarding leanne at sshpa4# echo $DISPLAY16.157.129.223:10.0 leanne at sshpa4# netstat -an|grep 6010tcp 0 0 16.157.129.223.6010 *.* LISTENtcp 0 0 *.6010 *.* LISTENtcp 0 0 *.6010 *.* LISTENtcp 0 0 *.6010 *.* LISTEN 6. user sway2 starts any X program will end with being hijacked by user "sway" leanne at sshpa4# xclock 7. hijacked by user "sway" sway at sshpa4# /opt/netcat/bin/nc -l -p 6010 -v -v -s sshpa4.chn.hp.comlistening on [16.157.129.223] 6010 ...connect to [16.157.129.223] from sshpa4.chn.hp.com [16.157.129.223] 54765B MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1?bs?????G???!?? I found that this problem could only happen when the "X11UseLocalhost no" is set in the sshd_config. I checked the code, found that there might be something wrong with the "channel_set_reuseaddr(sock);" function which is called in the function x11_create_display_inet in file channels.c Can someone check this out for me , thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2008-May-20 00:23 UTC
[Bug 1464] "possible hijacking of X11-forwarded connections" bug has not been fixed completely
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1464 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bitbucket at mindrot.org |djm at mindrot.org --- Comment #1 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> 2008-05-20 10:22:56 --- Created an attachment (id=1504) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1504) Don't set SO_REUSEADDR for X11UseLocalhost=no So this turns out to be a sysv stupidity. BSD derived systems perform a permission check when attempting a bind() with SO_REUSEADDR set: if a previous bind() to that port has been made, then additional bind()s to the same port must come from the same user, or root. sysv-ish systems (including Linux) lack this mechanism. Since we can't rely on sane semantics, this patch turns off SO_REUSEADDR when setting up the X11 listeners for non-loopback binds. The downside of this is a greater likelihood of port exhaustion in the range (6010-7009) that SSH is prepared to bind on, since ports in TIME_WAIT will no longer be candidates for listeners. Please test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2008-May-20 02:46 UTC
[Bug 1464] "possible hijacking of X11-forwarded connections" bug has not been fixed completely
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1464 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|Other |All OS/Version|HP-UX |All Blocks| |1452 --- Comment #2 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> 2008-05-20 12:46:53 --- Put this on the 5.1 list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2008-Jun-11 21:58 UTC
[Bug 1464] "possible hijacking of X11-forwarded connections" bug has not been fixed completely
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1464 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Priority|P5 |P1 CC| |dtucker at zip.com.au --- Comment #3 from Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> 2008-06-12 07:58:40 --- The patch has been applied and will be in tomorrow's snapshot (http://www.mindrot.org/openssh_snap/). Could you please confirm? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. You are watching the assignee of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org
2008-Jul-22 02:22 UTC
[Bug 1464] "possible hijacking of X11-forwarded connections" bug has not been fixed completely
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1464 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> 2008-07-22 12:22:25 --- Mass update RESOLVED->CLOSED after release of openssh-5.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. You are watching the assignee of the bug.
Maybe Matching Threads
- "possible hijacking of X11-forwarded connections" bug has not been fixed completely
- "ServerAliveInterval" and "ServerAliveCountMax" doesnt work in openssh50?
- [Help] When one application internally invokes another applic ation?
- [Bug 52] ssh hangs on exit
- [Help] Flash 5 installation failed on Wine 4-9-2002