bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2005-Feb-09 05:02 UTC
[Bug 960] Support needed for NetBSD utmpx field ut_ss
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=960 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #746| |ok+ Flag| | ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2005-02-09 16:02 ------- (From update of attachment 746) That looks OK to me ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2005-Feb-09 09:25 UTC
[Bug 960] Support needed for NetBSD utmpx field ut_ss
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=960 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2005-02-09 20:25 ------- Thanks but I'm not keen to apply this until someone who knows NetBSD can confirm that not using login(3) won't cause any other unpleasant side effects. Any NetBSD'ers lurking here want to comment? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [Bug 960] Support needed for NetBSD utmpx field ut_ss
- [Bug 960] Support needed for NetBSD utmpx field ut_ss
- [Bug 960] Support needed for NetBSD utmpx field ut_ss
- [Bug 378] sshd does not update utmp/utmpx records correctly when "UseLogin" feature on
- patch for NetBSD utmp (ut_name instead of ut_host)