Mapstraction - Mar 2010 - Geocoding module added to Mapstraction v2

Hi!
I have converted this module to the v2 architecture and published it in the
git repository.
Is this the correct way to publish new modules in Mapstraction??
If it is not OK, which is the correct way?

-- 
Thanks,
        Pablo L?pez Escob?s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mapstraction.com/pipermail/mapstraction-mapstraction.com/attachments/20100322/800fb752/attachment.htm>

2010/3/22 Pablo L?pez Escob?s <plopesc at
gmail.com>:
> Hi!
Hi Pablo
> I have converted this module to the v2 architecture and published it in the
> git repository.
great work, but what git repository? Do you mean svn?
> Is this the correct way to publish new modules in Mapstraction??
to my knowledge this is the code repository
http://code.google.com/p/mapstraction/
> If it is not OK, which is the correct way?
>
> --
> Thanks,
> ? ? ? ? Pablo L?pez Escob?s
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mapstraction mailing list
> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com
> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com
>
>

Hi!

I have been working with this git repository:
http://github.com/idelab/mxn
I have seen that there are not any commit since December, and I think that
it is not the correct way to add new code to the Mapstraction project.
If the correct way is the svn repository (
http://code.google.com/p/mapstraction/source/checkout). How can I commit my
code to this repository??

El 22 de marzo de 2010 12:18, Ed Freyfogle <edf at sloan.mit.edu>
escribi?:
> 2010/3/22 Pablo L?pez Escob?s <plopesc at gmail.com>:
> > Hi!
>
> Hi Pablo
>
> > I have converted this module to the v2 architecture and published it
in
> the
> > git repository.
>
> great work, but what git repository? Do you mean svn?
>
> > Is this the correct way to publish new modules in Mapstraction??
>
> to my knowledge this is the code repository
> http://code.google.com/p/mapstraction/
>
> > If it is not OK, which is the correct way?
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> >         Pablo L?pez Escob?s
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mapstraction mailing list
> > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com
> >
http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com
> >
> >
>


-- 
Saludos,
        Pablo L?pez Escob?s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mapstraction.com/pipermail/mapstraction-mapstraction.com/attachments/20100322/26bf1b6d/attachment.htm>

2010/3/22 Pablo L?pez Escob?s <plopesc at
gmail.com>:
> Hi!
>
We need to have one source of truth, otherwise we get out of sync.
I personally have no preference about which it is beyond that I''m used
to using
http://code.google.com/p/mapstraction/

submitting requires write access, which I have but unfortunately I
can''t give you

only the project owners: robert.moran, dezfowler, ajturner can.

Guys can you give Pablo write access. Also perhaps widen the pool of
people who can do this?

In my opinion we should get rid of the github version as it it just
causes confusion to have two versions.

thoughts?

> I have been working with this git repository:
> http://github.com/idelab/mxn
> I have seen that there are not any commit since December, and I think that
> it is not the correct way to add new code to the Mapstraction project.
> If the correct way is the svn repository
> (http://code.google.com/p/mapstraction/source/checkout). How can I commit
my
> code to this repository??
>
> El 22 de marzo de 2010 12:18, Ed Freyfogle <edf at sloan.mit.edu>
escribi?:
>>
>> 2010/3/22 Pablo L?pez Escob?s <plopesc at gmail.com>:
>> > Hi!
>>
>> Hi Pablo
>>
>> > I have converted this module to the v2 architecture and published
it in
>> > the
>> > git repository.
>>
>> great work, but what git repository? Do you mean svn?
>>
>> > Is this the correct way to publish new modules in Mapstraction??
>>
>> to my knowledge this is the code repository
>> http://code.google.com/p/mapstraction/
>>
>> > If it is not OK, which is the correct way?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thanks,
>> > ? ? ? ? Pablo L?pez Escob?s
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Mapstraction mailing list
>> > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com
>> >
http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
> --
> Saludos,
> ? ? ? ? Pablo L?pez Escob?s
>

Ed Freyfogle wrote:
> 2010/3/22 Pablo L?pez Escob?s<plopesc at gmail.com>:
>    
>> Hi!
>>
>>      
>
> We need to have one source of truth, otherwise we get out of sync.
> I personally have no preference about which it is beyond that I''m
used to using
> http://code.google.com/p/mapstraction/
>
> submitting requires write access, which I have but unfortunately I
> can''t give you
>
> only the project owners: robert.moran, dezfowler, ajturner can.
>
> Guys can you give Pablo write access. Also perhaps widen the pool of
> people who can do this?
>
> In my opinion we should get rid of the github version as it it just
> causes confusion to have two versions.
>    
> thoughts?
>    
Personally, I much prefer working in Git for reasons just like this. A 
developer can implement features, put them up and they can be tested and 
merged if ok into the official repository in SVN

In addition, more awareness of the project via other sites isn''t bad - 
and encourages people to experiment with the code and put up changes 
that we can more easily see and test. I can put more information in the 
Github version that states clearly that it''s just a mirror of the
Google
Code project.

What can be done in this case is one of a few things:
  - Pablo can generate a patch against the SVN version and submit that
  - I can merge in Pablo''s changes into Github and then push those to 
the SVN
  - Just give developers like Pablo write access to submit changes to 
the SVN


What are others thoughts?

Andrew
>
>    
>> I have been working with this git repository:
>> http://github.com/idelab/mxn
>> I have seen that there are not any commit since December, and I think
that
>> it is not the correct way to add new code to the Mapstraction project.
>> If the correct way is the svn repository
>> (http://code.google.com/p/mapstraction/source/checkout). How can I
commit my
>> code to this repository??
>>
>> El 22 de marzo de 2010 12:18, Ed Freyfogle<edf at sloan.mit.edu> 
escribi?:
>>      
>>> 2010/3/22 Pablo L?pez Escob?s<plopesc at gmail.com>:
>>>        
>>>> Hi!
>>>>          
>>> Hi Pablo
>>>
>>>        
>>>> I have converted this module to the v2 architecture and
published it in
>>>> the
>>>> git repository.
>>>>          
>>> great work, but what git repository? Do you mean svn?
>>>
>>>        
>>>> Is this the correct way to publish new modules in
Mapstraction??
>>>>          
>>> to my knowledge this is the code repository
>>> http://code.google.com/p/mapstraction/
>>>
>>>        
>>>> If it is not OK, which is the correct way?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>          Pablo L?pez Escob?s
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Mapstraction mailing list
>>>> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com
>>>>
http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          
>>
>> --
>> Saludos,
>>          Pablo L?pez Escob?s
>>
>>      
> _______________________________________________
> Mapstraction mailing list
> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com
> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com
>    

-- 
Andrew Turner
m: 248.982.3609 e: andrew at highearthorbit.com t: @ajturner
b: http://highearthorbit.com w: http://geocommons.com
Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mapstraction.com/pipermail/mapstraction-mapstraction.com/attachments/20100322/d94cfc5f/attachment.htm>

2010/3/22 Andrew Turner <ajturner at gmail.com>:
> Ed Freyfogle wrote:
>
> 2010/3/22 Pablo L?pez Escob?s <plopesc at gmail.com>:
>
>
> Hi!
>
>
>
> We need to have one source of truth, otherwise we get out of sync.
> I personally have no preference about which it is beyond that I''m
used to
> using
> http://code.google.com/p/mapstraction/
>
> submitting requires write access, which I have but unfortunately I
> can''t give you
>
> only the project owners: robert.moran, dezfowler, ajturner can.
>
> Guys can you give Pablo write access. Also perhaps widen the pool of
> people who can do this?
>
> In my opinion we should get rid of the github version as it it just
> causes confusion to have two versions.
>
>
> thoughts?
>
>
> Personally, I much prefer working in Git for reasons just like this. A
> developer can implement features, put them up and they can be tested and
> merged if ok into the official repository in SVN
>
totally unclear to me that was the desired work flow.
> In addition, more awareness of the project via other sites isn''t
bad - and
> encourages people to experiment with the code and put up changes that we
can
> more easily see and test. I can put more information in the Github version
> that states clearly that it''s just a mirror of the Google Code
project.
>
yes definitely please do. perhaps it''s just me but I find it very
confusing.
Who maintains the github and keeps it in sync? Do other projects work
in this way?
> What can be done in this case is one of a few things:
> ?- Pablo can generate a patch against the SVN version and submit that
> ?- I can merge in Pablo''s changes into Github and then push those
to the SVN
> ?- Just give developers like Pablo write access to submit changes to the
SVN
>
>
> What are others thoughts?
>
I see the benefit of not just letting anyone write to the source of
truth, things should get reviewed and discussed. But likewise people
who want to contribute shouldnt have to continually jump through all
sorts of hoops.

In general though I think the problem here is that the process is unclear

> Andrew
>
>
>
>
> I have been working with this git repository:
> http://github.com/idelab/mxn
> I have seen that there are not any commit since December, and I think that
> it is not the correct way to add new code to the Mapstraction project.
> If the correct way is the svn repository
> (http://code.google.com/p/mapstraction/source/checkout). How can I commit
my
> code to this repository??
>
> El 22 de marzo de 2010 12:18, Ed Freyfogle <edf at sloan.mit.edu>
escribi?:
>
>
> 2010/3/22 Pablo L?pez Escob?s <plopesc at gmail.com>:
>
>
> Hi!
>
>
> Hi Pablo
>
>
>
> I have converted this module to the v2 architecture and published it in
> the
> git repository.
>
>
> great work, but what git repository? Do you mean svn?
>
>
>
> Is this the correct way to publish new modules in Mapstraction??
>
>
> to my knowledge this is the code repository
> http://code.google.com/p/mapstraction/
>
>
>
> If it is not OK, which is the correct way?
>
> --
> Thanks,
> ? ? ? ? Pablo L?pez Escob?s
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mapstraction mailing list
> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com
> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> Saludos,
> ? ? ? ? Pablo L?pez Escob?s
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mapstraction mailing list
> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com
> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com
>
>
> --
> Andrew Turner
> m: 248.982.3609 e: andrew at highearthorbit.com t: @ajturner
> b: http://highearthorbit.com w: http://geocommons.com
> Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography
>
>

I have been working in Mapstraction for 10 months and I have commit other
module to the Git (Interactivity module). I pulled it some months ago and I
have no response about it.

I''m working with Mapstraction and have developed a Drupal module about
Mapstraction (http://www.drupal.org/project/mapstraction_cck).

Now, I have refactored the geocoded module to v2 Architecture.

I think that the process is not clear and it is necessary a definite
workflow.

Thanks!!

2010/3/22 Ed Freyfogle <edf at sloan.mit.edu>
> 2010/3/22 Andrew Turner <ajturner at gmail.com>:
> > Ed Freyfogle wrote:
> >
> > 2010/3/22 Pablo L?pez Escob?s <plopesc at gmail.com>:
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> >
> > We need to have one source of truth, otherwise we get out of sync.
> > I personally have no preference about which it is beyond that
I''m used to
> > using
> > http://code.google.com/p/mapstraction/
> >
> > submitting requires write access, which I have but unfortunately I
> > can''t give you
> >
> > only the project owners: robert.moran, dezfowler, ajturner can.
> >
> > Guys can you give Pablo write access. Also perhaps widen the pool of
> > people who can do this?
> >
> > In my opinion we should get rid of the github version as it it just
> > causes confusion to have two versions.
> >
> >
> > thoughts?
> >
> >
> > Personally, I much prefer working in Git for reasons just like this. A
> > developer can implement features, put them up and they can be tested
and
> > merged if ok into the official repository in SVN
> >
>
> totally unclear to me that was the desired work flow.
>
> > In addition, more awareness of the project via other sites
isn''t bad -
> and
> > encourages people to experiment with the code and put up changes that
we
> can
> > more easily see and test. I can put more information in the Github
> version
> > that states clearly that it''s just a mirror of the Google
Code project.
> >
>
> yes definitely please do. perhaps it''s just me but I find it very
> confusing.
> Who maintains the github and keeps it in sync? Do other projects work
> in this way?
>
> > What can be done in this case is one of a few things:
> >  - Pablo can generate a patch against the SVN version and submit that
> >  - I can merge in Pablo''s changes into Github and then push
those to the
> SVN
> >  - Just give developers like Pablo write access to submit changes to
the
> SVN
> >
> >
> > What are others thoughts?
> >
>
> I see the benefit of not just letting anyone write to the source of
> truth, things should get reviewed and discussed. But likewise people
> who want to contribute shouldnt have to continually jump through all
> sorts of hoops.
>
> In general though I think the problem here is that the process is unclear
>
>
> > Andrew
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I have been working with this git repository:
> > http://github.com/idelab/mxn
> > I have seen that there are not any commit since December, and I think
> that
> > it is not the correct way to add new code to the Mapstraction project.
> > If the correct way is the svn repository
> > (http://code.google.com/p/mapstraction/source/checkout). How can I
> commit my
> > code to this repository??
> >
> > El 22 de marzo de 2010 12:18, Ed Freyfogle <edf at
sloan.mit.edu> escribi?:
> >
> >
> > 2010/3/22 Pablo L?pez Escob?s <plopesc at gmail.com>:
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> > Hi Pablo
> >
> >
> >
> > I have converted this module to the v2 architecture and published it
in
> > the
> > git repository.
> >
> >
> > great work, but what git repository? Do you mean svn?
> >
> >
> >
> > Is this the correct way to publish new modules in Mapstraction??
> >
> >
> > to my knowledge this is the code repository
> > http://code.google.com/p/mapstraction/
> >
> >
> >
> > If it is not OK, which is the correct way?
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> >         Pablo L?pez Escob?s
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mapstraction mailing list
> > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com
> >
http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Saludos,
> >         Pablo L?pez Escob?s
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mapstraction mailing list
> > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com
> >
http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Turner
> > m: 248.982.3609 e: andrew at highearthorbit.com t: @ajturner
> > b: http://highearthorbit.com w: http://geocommons.com
> > Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography
> >
> >
>


-- 
Saludos,
        Pablo L?pez Escob?s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mapstraction.com/pipermail/mapstraction-mapstraction.com/attachments/20100322/3f7a328d/attachment.htm>

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Andrew Turner <ajturner at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> What can be done in this case is one of a few things:
>  - Pablo can generate a patch against the SVN version and submit that
>  - I can merge in Pablo''s changes into Github and then push those
to the
> SVN
>  - Just give developers like Pablo write access to submit changes to the
> SVN
>
>
> What are others thoughts?
>
>
I''m interested in contributing too, as I''m working on a
project that
requires a some updates to the openlayers module.

I have a Google code project too, and while I''m not managing the
contributions of others yet, I''ve considered it. I think you can allow
contributors to commit to only specific branches, so you could have a
community branch that you review before reintegrating it to trunk. There
also appears to be a code review mechanism for reviewing a revision, but I
haven''t used it yet. It might be a process for deciding to keep or
reject a
revision.

Thanks for asking!

-dylan-
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mapstraction.com/pipermail/mapstraction-mapstraction.com/attachments/20100322/c8f7d139/attachment.htm>

I have read today new mails about how to collaborate with Mapstraction.
I have planned work with mapstraction about some improvements. I think that
this process should be more organized.
It would be a good idea to design a roadmap and don?t waste or duplicate
efforts.
We should define the different ways to help in order to avoid
misunderstandings.

Any ideas?

Thanks!!

El 22 de marzo de 2010 13:50, Pablo L?pez Escob?s <plopesc at
gmail.com>escribi?:
> I have been working in Mapstraction for 10 months and I have commit other
> module to the Git (Interactivity module). I pulled it some months ago and I
> have no response about it.
>
> I''m working with Mapstraction and have developed a Drupal module
about
> Mapstraction (http://www.drupal.org/project/mapstraction_cck).
>
> Now, I have refactored the geocoded module to v2 Architecture.
>
> I think that the process is not clear and it is necessary a definite
> workflow.
>
> Thanks!!
>
> 2010/3/22 Ed Freyfogle <edf at sloan.mit.edu>
>
> 2010/3/22 Andrew Turner <ajturner at gmail.com>:
>> > Ed Freyfogle wrote:
>> >
>> > 2010/3/22 Pablo L?pez Escob?s <plopesc at gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > We need to have one source of truth, otherwise we get out of sync.
>> > I personally have no preference about which it is beyond that
I''m used
>> to
>> > using
>> > http://code.google.com/p/mapstraction/
>> >
>> > submitting requires write access, which I have but unfortunately I
>> > can''t give you
>> >
>> > only the project owners: robert.moran, dezfowler, ajturner can.
>> >
>> > Guys can you give Pablo write access. Also perhaps widen the pool
of
>> > people who can do this?
>> >
>> > In my opinion we should get rid of the github version as it it
just
>> > causes confusion to have two versions.
>> >
>> >
>> > thoughts?
>> >
>> >
>> > Personally, I much prefer working in Git for reasons just like
this. A
>> > developer can implement features, put them up and they can be
tested and
>> > merged if ok into the official repository in SVN
>> >
>>
>> totally unclear to me that was the desired work flow.
>>
>> > In addition, more awareness of the project via other sites
isn''t bad -
>> and
>> > encourages people to experiment with the code and put up changes
that we
>> can
>> > more easily see and test. I can put more information in the Github
>> version
>> > that states clearly that it''s just a mirror of the Google
Code project.
>> >
>>
>> yes definitely please do. perhaps it''s just me but I find it
very
>> confusing.
>> Who maintains the github and keeps it in sync? Do other projects work
>> in this way?
>>
>> > What can be done in this case is one of a few things:
>> >  - Pablo can generate a patch against the SVN version and submit
that
>> >  - I can merge in Pablo''s changes into Github and then
push those to the
>> SVN
>> >  - Just give developers like Pablo write access to submit changes
to the
>> SVN
>> >
>> >
>> > What are others thoughts?
>> >
>>
>> I see the benefit of not just letting anyone write to the source of
>> truth, things should get reviewed and discussed. But likewise people
>> who want to contribute shouldnt have to continually jump through all
>> sorts of hoops.
>>
>> In general though I think the problem here is that the process is
unclear
>>
>>
>> > Andrew
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I have been working with this git repository:
>> > http://github.com/idelab/mxn
>> > I have seen that there are not any commit since December, and I
think
>> that
>> > it is not the correct way to add new code to the Mapstraction
project.
>> > If the correct way is the svn repository
>> > (http://code.google.com/p/mapstraction/source/checkout). How can I
>> commit my
>> > code to this repository??
>> >
>> > El 22 de marzo de 2010 12:18, Ed Freyfogle <edf at
sloan.mit.edu>
>> escribi?:
>> >
>> >
>> > 2010/3/22 Pablo L?pez Escob?s <plopesc at gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi Pablo
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I have converted this module to the v2 architecture and published
it in
>> > the
>> > git repository.
>> >
>> >
>> > great work, but what git repository? Do you mean svn?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Is this the correct way to publish new modules in Mapstraction??
>> >
>> >
>> > to my knowledge this is the code repository
>> > http://code.google.com/p/mapstraction/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > If it is not OK, which is the correct way?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thanks,
>> >         Pablo L?pez Escob?s
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Mapstraction mailing list
>> > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com
>> >
>>
http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Saludos,
>> >         Pablo L?pez Escob?s
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Mapstraction mailing list
>> > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com
>> >
>>
http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Andrew Turner
>> > m: 248.982.3609 e: andrew at highearthorbit.com t: @ajturner
>> > b: http://highearthorbit.com w: http://geocommons.com
>> > Introduction to Neogeography -
http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Saludos,
>         Pablo L?pez Escob?s
>


-- 
Saludos,
        Pablo L?pez Escob?s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mapstraction.com/pipermail/mapstraction-mapstraction.com/attachments/20100323/f6fffdab/attachment.htm>