Andrew Cooper
2011-Oct-05 15:09 UTC
[Xen-devel] Recommend backporting unstable 23685:5239811f92e1 to 4.1-testing
XenServer is suffering the segfault with Xen-4.1. The changeset does not cleanly apply because of 4.1-testing 23160:5c395e993fe4 affecting the same hunk, but the backport is trivial. -- Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Keir Fraser
2011-Oct-05 16:46 UTC
[Xen-devel] Re: Recommend backporting unstable 23685:5239811f92e1 to 4.1-testing
On 05/10/2011 16:09, "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:> XenServer is suffering the segfault with Xen-4.1. > > The changeset does not cleanly apply because of 4.1-testing > 23160:5c395e993fe4 affecting the same hunk, but the backport is trivial.No point ccing me on a toolstack patch. This needs to be backported, or acked/nacked, by e.g. IanJ. ASAP preferably then we can get the next RC rolling. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Ian Jackson
2011-Oct-06 18:08 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Recommend backporting unstable 23685:5239811f92e1 to 4.1-testing [and 1 more messages]
Andrew Cooper writes ("[Xen-devel] Recommend backporting unstable
23685:5239811f92e1 to 4.1-testing"):> XenServer is suffering the segfault with Xen-4.1.
>
> The changeset does not cleanly apply because of 4.1-testing
> 23160:5c395e993fe4 affecting the same hunk, but the backport is trivial.
Thanks for bringing this up. Next time, unless the changeset to be
backported applies correctly without manual fixups, we''d appreciate it
if you would provide an actual backport yourself. This time I did it
for you.
So, I have done this backport.
Thanks,
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel