rspec users - Aug 2009 - Using "with(params)" with stubs make any sense?

On 28 Aug 2009, at 19:44, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Since stubs don''t set expectations, do we have any use-case where
> stubbing like this makes sense:
>
> @mock.stub!(:method).with(anything()).and_return(@collection).
>
> It is clear that and_return is the value from stubbing, but the with  
> doesn''t make any sense, in case, IMO.
I *think* the point here is that it would be distinct from another  
stub on the same method that specified #with some specific parameters.  
The one #with(anything()) would then be used as the fall-back. Maybe?