wine users - Feb 2009 - Is there a chance that Globalscape Secure FTP work on Wine

Is there a chance that Globalscape Secure FTP work on Wine under the Ubuntu
server.

I cant login from the Admin console to ftp engine, I get some socket error, like
the engine isn't started.

Any help on this matter would be appreciated.

loopdemack wrote:
> Is there a chance that Globalscape Secure FTP work on Wine under the Ubuntu
server.
What's wrong with the one you already have (sshd)?

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:04 AM, loopdemack <wineforum-user at winehq.org>
wrote:
> Is there a chance that Globalscape Secure FTP work on Wine under the Ubuntu
server.
>
> I cant login from the Admin console to ftp engine, I get some socket error,
like the engine isn't started.
>
> Any help on this matter would be appreciated.
>
Could be that it's trying to bind to a privileged port (<1024), which
is reserved for root on Linux.

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:49 AM, vitamin <wineforum-user at winehq.org>
wrote:
>> Is there a chance that Globalscape Secure FTP work on Wine under the
Ubuntu server.
> What's wrong with the one you already have (sshd)?
Perhaps he needs FTP and not ssh. Wine is meant to run win32
applications, can you please stop discouraging people from doing so?

-- 
-Austin

vitamin wrote:
> 
> loopdemack wrote:
> > Is there a chance that Globalscape Secure FTP work on Wine under the
Ubuntu server.
> 
> What's wrong with the one you already have (sshd)?

Good morning Vitamin, how are you today, tnak you on spoting my post.

let me explain you.

When I said "Secure FTP" , I didnt meant sshd od sftp.

In fact "Smart FTP" is the product, its a FTP server made from
Globalscape company for the Windows platform.

http://www.globalscape.com/gsftps/

My question is is there a chance to get it work in the wine.

I overcome the problem with the socket it was the privilege thing, but now I got
the new problem.

Here is the picture:




[Image:
http://imageflux.net/uploads/090203/IE_ik4AbWfERR6N5-M6HygKuvl4/error2.png ]

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:03 AM, loopdemack <wineforum-user at winehq.org>
wrote:
> I overcome the problem with the socket it was the privilege thing, but now
I got the new problem.
>
> Here is the picture:
>
>
>
>
> [Image:
http://imageflux.net/uploads/090203/IE_ik4AbWfERR6N5-M6HygKuvl4/error2.png ]
>
>
>
>
>
>
Terminal output?

-- 
-Austin

loopdemack wrote:
> When I said "Secure FTP" , I didnt meant sshd or sftp.
Then I repeat the question again, what is wrong with sshd's sftp? It is _the
Secure FTP_ server.

Here is the terminal output:

root at demo:~/.wine/drive_c/sf# wine cftpsai.exe
fixme:advapi:SetEntriesInAclA 1 0x752628 (nil) 0x33fa64
fixme:advapi:SetEntriesInAclA 1 0x752628 (nil) 0x33fa64
fixme:advapi:RegisterEventSourceA ((null),"GlobalSCAPE Secure FTP
Server"): stub
fixme:advapi:RegisterEventSourceW (L"",L"GlobalSCAPE Secure FTP
Server"): stub
fixme:advapi:ReportEventA
(0xcafe4242,0x0004,0x0000,0x00000069,(nil),0x0000,0x00000000,0x7dc539bc,(nil)):
stub
fixme:richedit:ME_HandleMessage WM_STYLECHANGING: stub
fixme:richedit:ME_HandleMessage WM_STYLECHANGED: stub
fixme:richedit:ME_HandleMessage ECO_AUTOHSCROLL not implemented yet!
fixme:richedit:ME_HandleMessage ECO_AUTOVSCROLL not implemented yet!
fixme:richedit:ME_HandleMessage ECO_NOHIDESEL not implemented yet!
fixme:richedit:ME_HandleMessage ECO_AUTOWORDSELECTION not implemented yet!
fixme:richedit:ME_HandleMessage WM_STYLECHANGING: stub
fixme:richedit:ME_HandleMessage WM_STYLECHANGED: stub
fixme:mpr:WNetGetUniversalNameA ("C:\\InetPub\\FTPRoot\\Default
Site\\", 0x00000002, 0x6374b0, 0x33de3c): stub
fixme:mpr:WNetGetUniversalNameA ("C:\\InetPub\\FTPRoot\\Default
Site\\", 0x00000002, 0x524f40, 0x7db42658): stub
err:ole:CoCreateInstance apartment not initialised
err:ole:CoCreateInstance apartment not initialised

-----------------------------

You see the two lines where he is asking for C:\\InetPub\\FTPRoot\\Default
Site\\

One more thing , I need to be logged as a root, to get this far, but again I
cant workaround this error.


Here is the picture



[Image: http://imageflux.net/uploads/090204/NxmG57TXULVeWjLoPF3b5CUzj2o/df.png ]

Any hope in this issue?

> Any hope in this issue?
>
Probably not. Just use the sftp server in your linux distribution.

John

John Drescher <drescherjm at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Any hope in this issue?
>>
>Probably not. Just use the sftp server in your linux distribution.
>
Is it possible to call the sftp server in Linux from Wine? (Provide code
here...)  This would solve the problem the OP is experiencing because of the use
of low ports (as is the case with another program the OP reported on) which are
not available to a normal user and forces the use of root as a workaround.

James McKenzie

austin987 wrote:
> 
> Well, not really. The user wants to use this program because it allows
> for virtual users, bandwidth throttling, etc. Using the native sftp
> server doesn't help there.

None of those will work on Wine anyway. There are other correct ways to do that
on *NIX.

vitamin <wineforum-user at winehq.org> wrote:
>Sent: Feb 10, 2009 2:09 PM
>To: wine-users at winehq.org
>Subject: [Wine] Re: Is there a chance that Globalscape Secure FTP work on
Wine
>
>
>austin987 wrote:
>> 
>> Well, not really. The user wants to use this program because it allows
>> for virtual users, bandwidth throttling, etc. Using the native sftp
>> server doesn't help there.
>
>
>None of those will work on Wine anyway. There are other correct ways to do
that on *NIX.
>
I'm of the opinion that this 'user' wants the implied security of
Linux, or its 'freeness' rather than put out the money and time to set
up Windows 2008 Server, which is required to get the full functionality of
GlobalScape FTP.  Sorry, but Wine is NOT a replacement for this Operating System
and probably never will be.  It is an implementation of the Windows32 API,
functions depend on the version of Windows(TM) selected.  We will not and should
not get into file permissions beyond that of what the base operating system
provides.  This will limit what functionality is available for some programs.

I agree with your statements above.  If the OP took the time, there are
solutions to what is needed.  And some of them are lengthy and complicated to
implement.  And it involves more than just setting up IPTables and TC.

James McKenzie