On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 07:15:28PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng
wrote:> From: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng at loongson.cn>
>
> The PCI code and ID assignment specification defined four types of
> display controllers for the display base class(03h), and the devices
> with 0x00h sub-class code are VGA devices. VGA devices with programming
I can update this with the spec details (PCI Code and Assignment spec
r1.15, secs 1.1 and 1.4).
> interface 0x00 is VGA-compatible, VGA devices with programming interface
> 0x01 are 8514-compatible controllers. Besides, PCI_CLASS_NOT_DEFINED_VGA
> is defined to provide backward compatibility for devices that were built
> before the class code field was defined. Hence, introduce the pci_is_vga()
> helper, let it handle the details for us. It returns true if the PCI(e)
> device being tested belongs to the VGA devices category.
>
> Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at orcam.me.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng at loongson.cn>
> ---
> include/linux/pci.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index cf6e0b057752..ace727001911 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -713,6 +713,33 @@ static inline bool pci_is_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev)
> dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_CARDBUS;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * The PCI code and ID assignment specification defined four types of
> + * display controllers for the display base class(03h), and the devices
> + * with 0x00h sub-class code are VGA devices. VGA devices with programming
> + * interface 0x00 is VGA-compatible, VGA devices with programming
interface
> + * 0x01 are 8514-compatible controllers. Besides,
PCI_CLASS_NOT_DEFINED_VGA
> + * is defined to provide backward compatibility for devices that were
built
> + * before the class code field was defined. This means that it belong to
the
> + * VGA devices category also.
> + *
> + * Returns:
> + * true if the PCI device is a VGA device, false otherwise.
> + */
> +static inline bool pci_is_vga(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + if (!pdev)
> + return false;
> +
> + if ((pdev->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA)
> + return true;
> +
> + if ((pdev->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_NOT_DEFINED_VGA)
> + return true;
Are you seeing a problem that will be fixed by this series, i.e., a
PCI_CLASS_NOT_DEFINED_VGA device that we currently don't handle
correctly?
I think this makes sense per the spec, but there's always a risk of
breaking something, so it's nice if the change actually *fixes*
something to make that risk worthwhile.
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> #define for_each_pci_bridge(dev, bus) \
> list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) \
> if (!pci_is_bridge(dev)) {} else
> --
> 2.34.1
>