Xuan Zhuo
2022-Dec-13 03:33 UTC
[PATCH net] virtio-net: correctly enable callback during start_xmit
On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 04:25:22 -0500, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote:> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 05:10:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > Commit a7766ef18b33("virtio_net: disable cb aggressively") enables > > virtqueue callback via the following statement: > > > > do { > > ...... > > } while (use_napi && kick && > > unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq))); > > > > This will cause a missing call to virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed() when > > kick is false. Fixing this by removing the checking of the kick from > > the condition to make sure callback is enabled correctly. > > > > Fixes: a7766ef18b33 ("virtio_net: disable cb aggressively") > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > > --- > > The patch is needed for -stable. > > stable rules don't allow for theoretical fixes. Was a problem observed? > > > --- > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > index 86e52454b5b5..44d7daf0267b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > @@ -1834,8 +1834,8 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) > > > > free_old_xmit_skbs(sq, false); > > > > - } while (use_napi && kick && > > - unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq))); > > + } while (use_napi && > > + unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq))); > > > > A bit more explanation pls. kick simply means !netdev_xmit_more - > if it's false we know there will be another packet, then transmissing > that packet will invoke virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed. No?It's just that there may be a next packet, but in fact there may not be. For example, the vq is full, and the driver stops the queue. Thanks.> > > > > > > /* timestamp packet in software */ > > skb_tx_timestamp(skb); > > -- > > 2.25.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Virtualization mailing list > Virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
Jason Wang
2022-Dec-13 03:43 UTC
[PATCH net] virtio-net: correctly enable callback during start_xmit
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 11:38 AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> wrote:> > On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 04:25:22 -0500, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 05:10:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > Commit a7766ef18b33("virtio_net: disable cb aggressively") enables > > > virtqueue callback via the following statement: > > > > > > do { > > > ...... > > > } while (use_napi && kick && > > > unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq))); > > > > > > This will cause a missing call to virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed() when > > > kick is false. Fixing this by removing the checking of the kick from > > > the condition to make sure callback is enabled correctly. > > > > > > Fixes: a7766ef18b33 ("virtio_net: disable cb aggressively") > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > > > --- > > > The patch is needed for -stable. > > > > stable rules don't allow for theoretical fixes. Was a problem observed?Yes, running a pktgen sample script can lead to a tx timeout.> > > > > --- > > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 ++-- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > index 86e52454b5b5..44d7daf0267b 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > @@ -1834,8 +1834,8 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) > > > > > > free_old_xmit_skbs(sq, false); > > > > > > - } while (use_napi && kick && > > > - unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq))); > > > + } while (use_napi && > > > + unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq))); > > > > > > > A bit more explanation pls. kick simply means !netdev_xmit_more - > > if it's false we know there will be another packet, then transmissing > > that packet will invoke virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed. No? > > It's just that there may be a next packet, but in fact there may not be. > For example, the vq is full, and the driver stops the queue.Exactly, when the queue is about to be full we disable tx and wait for the next tx interrupt to re-enable tx. Thanks> > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* timestamp packet in software */ > > > skb_tx_timestamp(skb); > > > -- > > > 2.25.1 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Virtualization mailing list > > Virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization >