Jason Wang
2021-Jul-05 05:09 UTC
[PATCH 3/3] vDPA/ifcvf: set_status() should get a adapter from the mgmt dev
? 2021/6/30 ??4:21, Zhu Lingshan ??:> ifcvf_vdpa_set_status() should get a adapter from the > management device > > Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu at intel.com> > --- > drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c > index 7c2f64ca2163..28c71eef1d2b 100644 > --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c > @@ -212,13 +212,15 @@ static u8 ifcvf_vdpa_get_status(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev) > > static void ifcvf_vdpa_set_status(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev, u8 status) > { > + struct ifcvf_vdpa_mgmt_dev *ifcvf_mgmt_dev; > struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter; > struct ifcvf_hw *vf; > u8 status_old; > int ret; > > vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev); > - adapter = dev_get_drvdata(vdpa_dev->dev.parent);If this is a fix for patch 2, you need to squash this into that one. Any reason that vdpa_to_adapter() can't work? And I see: +struct ifcvf_vdpa_mgmt_dev { + struct vdpa_mgmt_dev mdev; + struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter; + struct pci_dev *pdev; +}; What's the reason for having a adapter pointer here? Thanks> + ifcvf_mgmt_dev = dev_get_drvdata(vdpa_dev->dev.parent); > + adapter = ifcvf_mgmt_dev->adapter; > status_old = ifcvf_get_status(vf); > > if (status_old == status)