Syslinux - Jun 2014 - [PATCH] utils/isohybrid.c: usage text change, s/AFP/APM/

Hi,

Geert Stappers
> You will see the recent commits, including the 'fseek' to
'fseeko' change.
I was looking at 
  http://git.kernel.org/cgit/boot/syslinux/syslinux.git
which is what Google brings up on "syslinux git" and looks
quite official.

Now i wonder about
  +#define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64
after it was already done in Makefile some time earlier.

Luckily, elsewise my local copy was up to date.

> > [statements about off_t and fseeko(3)]
> Please convert that into patches to the mailinglist.
I got six patches now.
The end version compiles and can run standalone without hardcoded MBRs.
I will make some repacking tests with a Fedora image.

Would diff -puN from one patched version to the next one be ok ?


Have a nice day :)

Thomas

Op 2014-06-22 om 17:06 schreef Thomas Schmitt:
> Geert Stappers
> > You will see the recent commits, including the 'fseek' to
'fseeko' change.
> 
> I was looking at 
>   http://git.kernel.org/cgit/boot/syslinux/syslinux.git
> which is what Google brings up on "syslinux git" and looks
> quite official.
And out-of-date

Up-to-date is http://git.zytor.com/?p=syslinux/syslinux.git
> 
> Now i wonder about
>   +#define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64
> after it was already done in Makefile some time earlier.
> 
> Luckily, elsewise my local copy was up to date.
> 
> 
> > > [statements about off_t and fseeko(3)]
> > Please convert that into patches to the mailinglist.
> 
> I got six patches now.
> The end version compiles and can run standalone without hardcoded MBRs.
> I will make some repacking tests with a Fedora image.
> 
> Would diff -puN from one patched version to the next one be ok ?
> 
Let's find out. Sent the patches.



Groeten
Geert Stappers
-- 
Leven en laten leven