On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:03 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote:> On 05/27/2013 11:01 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: >> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:04 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: >>> On 05/27/2013 04:49 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: >>>> >>>> 115200 = 0x1C200 so "SERIAL 1 115200" should be setting the bit rate >>>> to 9600 and the flow control to 0x200. >>>> >>> >>> I really hope that is not true. >> >> Should "SERIAL port [[baudrate] flowcontrol]" actually be "SERIAL port >> [baudrate [flowcontrol]]"? >> > > Yes.Was there ever a time that the behavior was "SERIAL port [[baudrate] flowcontrol]" or has it been misdocumented for years? -- -Gene
On 05/27/2013 11:19 AM, Gene Cumm wrote:> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:03 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: >> On 05/27/2013 11:01 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: >>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:04 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: >>>> On 05/27/2013 04:49 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: >>>>> >>>>> 115200 = 0x1C200 so "SERIAL 1 115200" should be setting the bit rate >>>>> to 9600 and the flow control to 0x200. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I really hope that is not true. >>> >>> Should "SERIAL port [[baudrate] flowcontrol]" actually be "SERIAL port >>> [baudrate [flowcontrol]]"? >>> >> >> Yes. > > Was there ever a time that the behavior was "SERIAL port [[baudrate] > flowcontrol]" or has it been misdocumented for years? >It's just a typo. -hpa
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:38 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote:> On 05/27/2013 11:19 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: >> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:03 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: >>> On 05/27/2013 11:01 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: >>>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:04 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: >>>>> On 05/27/2013 04:49 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> 115200 = 0x1C200 so "SERIAL 1 115200" should be setting the bit rate >>>>>> to 9600 and the flow control to 0x200. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I really hope that is not true. >>>> >>>> Should "SERIAL port [[baudrate] flowcontrol]" actually be "SERIAL port >>>> [baudrate [flowcontrol]]"? >>>> >>> >>> Yes. >> >> Was there ever a time that the behavior was "SERIAL port [[baudrate] >> flowcontrol]" or has it been misdocumented for years? >> > > It's just a typo.Whoops! That would explain why that line has always seemed "quirky". -- -Gene