Frediano Ziglio
2013-Feb-07 11:05 UTC
[syslinux] Syncying and upstreaming 4k sector patches
Hi, time ago I started doing support for 4k sector disk for syslinux. Patches worked for my cases (ext) and did not introduced regression problems with normal disks. Now I would like to update these patches and upstream them. It's not clear however which is the branch I should use to rebase these patches. Previous patches was against syslinux-4.06 but now there is syslinux-5.01 (elflink) and syslinux-6.00-pre4 (firmware). Frediano
On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 11:05 +0000, Frediano Ziglio wrote:> Hi, > time ago I started doing support for 4k sector disk for syslinux. > > Patches worked for my cases (ext) and did not introduced regression > problems with normal disks. Now I would like to update these patches and > upstream them. It's not clear however which is the branch I should use > to rebase these patches. Previous patches was against syslinux-4.06 but > now there is syslinux-5.01 (elflink) and syslinux-6.00-pre4 (firmware).If you could rebase your patches against the elflink branch that would be helpful. Thanks! -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
H. Peter Anvin
2013-Feb-07 16:14 UTC
[syslinux] Syncying and upstreaming 4k sector patches
Upstreaming for 5.0x would be the right thing. Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio at citrix.com> wrote:>Hi, > time ago I started doing support for 4k sector disk for syslinux. > >Patches worked for my cases (ext) and did not introduced regression >problems with normal disks. Now I would like to update these patches >and >upstream them. It's not clear however which is the branch I should use >to rebase these patches. Previous patches was against syslinux-4.06 but >now there is syslinux-5.01 (elflink) and syslinux-6.00-pre4 (firmware). > >Frediano-- Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.