On Oct 16, 2012 3:42 PM, "Ady" <ady-sf at hotmail.com>
wrote:> >Sure.
> >And take the next time more time to explain why you recommend it.
> >Mostly because to get beyond a moderator of this mailinglist.
> >
> >In other words:
> >Stappers considered the blut URL dropping as spam.
> >He flagged the posting E-mail address as to be moderated.
> >
> >No hard feelings, nothing personal.
> >
> >Cheers
> >Geert Stappers
>
> What I don't understand is, if the original email was flagged to be
> moderated, then why it was allowed anyway? Clearly, it shouldn't had
> been allowed, much less repeated.
I think Geert Stappers meant that all email from that address will now be
moderated. Iirc, addresses that aren't subscribed and confirmed may not
post without moderation.
--
-Gene