similar to: asterisk tapi

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "asterisk tapi"

2005 Jul 28
4
TAPI Interface
Hi All !!! Somebody can inform me where to get more information about the TAPI (M$) interface of the Asterisk ? Thanks in advance. --- Isamp
2005 May 23
4
CallerID, TAPI and CTI
I would like to hear stories from people using TAPI, CTI or CallerID software with Asterisk. What are you guys using, setup examples, etc. Has anybody sucessfully integrated SugarCRM with Asterisk and how did you do it. Are you running callerid software? Did you stumble into problems like using tapi and callerid software returned both the callerid and calledid? Hope you can help me out with
2007 Nov 30
1
OT - How to add a new TAPI driver on an XP system ?
Hi, To make a long story short, I can't install any TAPI driver on my XP platform. A. Within Config Panel|Modems and Telephony options|Advanced parameters, I've got a list of 7 TAPI drivers. Among them is Omniis TAPI driver for Asterisk. B. I can properly configure this driver (line, context, ...). C. When I open Outlook 2002 Contacts panel, I can select "Call this contact"
2007 May 22
0
asterisk TAPI interface
Hello, I need to connect asterisk 1.2.16, with a Contect Center software that works with TAPI. As I know, asterisk doesn't support TAPI directly, if needs a tirth party software. I just reading about asttapi and Activa TAPI. does anyone test this software? have you using asterisk againts a TAPI compatible software? Witch TAPI software do you test? Thanks in advance. VoipCrazy
2005 Mar 20
1
TAPI
I just installed tapi and some app called identapop pro. I havent tested incoming calls yet but so far, I cant get calls out using outlooks. I configured TAPI for asterisk inside outlooks and I set TAPI to these configs: TAPI connects using the manager to asterisk without problems. As channels I configure this: User channel: SIP/myphone and the phone actually rings when I tell outlook to dial
2005 Aug 02
0
TAPI driver: AstTAPI
Hello, We are using AstTAPI to make call?s from Outlook and it woks perfect. Our issue is that it doesn?t work so well with our CRM. Although the TAPI line initialization is successful, AstTAPI doesn?t report the Phone Number and TAPI doesn?t know about our extension. Anybody knows how to solve this? Ours log: 2005/08/02 15:42:32:476 Information 0x50002 in Process 2040 Thread 1784 Location:
2006 May 16
0
Asttapi for Asterisk 1.2 Testers Needed (was RE:Asterisk TAPI - Outlook click2dial)
Had I have been smart originally I would have done this to start. Some rudimentary documentation above and beyond Asttapi 0.10's poor documentation is available along with the download at http://www.kirkhamsystems.com/asttapi. Clint -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kerry Garrison Sent:
2018 Dec 31
0
[RFC] Proposal: llvm-tapi, adding YAML/stub generation for ELF linking support
<div dir='auto'>Maybe LLD is lagging behind, but is the TAPI stuff that's landed close enough to the original such that Apple cctools could be modified to use it?<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Cheers,</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div
2010 May 26
5
OT: Windows TAPI command-line driver
Hi, This is a bit off-topic, but still related to telephony. Is there a barebones TAPI driver that exists that would allow me to call up a command line with, as parameter, the number to dial. For exemple, Outlook integrates with TAPI, so that TAPI driver would allow me to call my own app with the phone number as argument. ex when clicking on 555-555-5555: the TAPI driver would call
2017 Oct 25
0
[cfe-dev] [RFC] Open sourcing and contributing TAPI back to the LLVM community
Hi Juergen, At a minimum I think adding the support to libobject, etc so the various llvm tools can read or even write files from/for OSX should be fairly non-controversial so how about go ahead and do that first (I'll happily review if you'd like) and then we can go from there to do anything else with TAPI and llvm? Sound good? -eric On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:01 PM Juergen Ributzka via
2018 Apr 09
0
[cfe-dev] [RFC] Open sourcing and contributing TAPI back to the LLVM community
I'm not really clear on the actual benefits of the TBD file, and why Apple migrated to them in the first place. Shouldn't a dynamic library containing only the relevant parts (e.g. the dynamic symbol table) be roughly comparable in size? And, much simpler to support? I assume that's effectively what "Mach-O Dynamic Library Stubs" actually _were_, before the introduction of
2003 Nov 12
1
TAPI development
Has anyone ever worked opn TAPI stuff to make asterisk work with it ? I'm a Windoze C++ developer dig'n into asterisk (and linux at the same time) since a few months and i'm quite interested in creating a TAPI driver for asterisk. so if anybody did any research in that way please inform me. Also i've you think it's quite impossible to do it we can discuss our idea's
2019 Mar 15
2
What's the status of Mach-O TAPI?
Adding Juergen to the thread. On Fri, Mar 15, 2019, 12:20 PM Shoaib Meenai via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Ping. > > > > Would anyone be opposed to me trying to revive the in-tree Mach-O TAPI > code? > > > > Thanks, > > Shoaib > > > > *From: *Shoaib Meenai <smeenai at fb.com> > *Date: *Wednesday, March 6, 2019 at
2019 Mar 07
2
What's the status of Mach-O TAPI?
Hi all, It looks like Juergen landed the TextAPI libraries for Mach-O in https://reviews.llvm.org/D53945, and also had several follow-ups, but then it was deleted entirely by r347874. I'm not sure if the entire deletion was intentional, since the commit message only mentions reverting a certain series of patches; CC Hans. In any case, I'm wondering if there are plans to revive it, since
2010 Sep 02
0
Microsoft TAPI 2.1
I have an application which runs fine under the latest version of WINE. However, when it tries to initialize the TAPI services, I get the following error. Cannot find import; DLL may be missing, corrupt, or wrong version File "TAPI32.DLL", function "lineGetMessage" (error 0) I have verified the DLL in fact does exist. I'm wondering if the version of TAPI compiled in
2007 Nov 30
0
OT - Which TAPI driver to use ?
Hi, I'm trying to use latest versions of ActivaTSP and Asttapi with an Astmanproxy-enabled 1.4 Asterisk. Up to now, I can't find a way to teach Outlook 2002 how to use any of those TAPI drivers: when using "Call this contact" in Outlook Contacts pane, I can't see and select any TAPI driver. Beside that, I'm wondering how those software compare and if they are usable
2006 May 11
1
Asterisk TAPI - Outlook click2dial
Yes, I have the exact same problem. :( -----Original Message----- From: Tomislav Vojvodic [mailto:tomislav@vox-mundi.net] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 5:48 AM To: xytek@hotmail.com; 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk TAPI - Outlook click2dial Hey, thanks for your reply.. ;) I'm also using asttapi from website you posted
2006 May 16
1
Asttapi for Asterisk 1.2 Testers Needed (was RE: Asterisk TAPI - Outlook click2dial)
I've finished a patched version of asttapi that will work with asterisk 1.2. There were fundamental changes to the Asterisk Management interface between 1.0 and 1.2 that broke asttapi. I think my patched version will work on 1.0 and 1.2 branches, but I have no way of testing since I don't have a 1.0 install nor do I want one :). I'm looking for testers, if anyone's willing to
2018 Sep 28
2
[RFC] Proposal: llvm-tapi, adding YAML/stub generation for ELF linking support
Oof, I didn't think about Clang not being in the same place. Perhaps we could put this in clang-tools-extra to solve that? As for the unification of the code bases. I was assuming we didn't want to just throw a ton of code over the wall anyway so the merge was going to need to be reviewed chunk by chunk anyhow. Support for the two formats should be possible to add in parallel (although, I
2018 Sep 26
2
[RFC] Proposal: llvm-tapi, adding YAML/stub generation for ELF linking support
Absolutely. The goal of the tool is to produce both textual and binary DSO stubs. This means you could take a DSO, produce a textual stub, modify it however you wish, and then produce a linkable binary stub from that modified .tbe. That, or you could bypass the textual portion altogether and just produce binary stubs from DSOs. While the textual format is useful, the goal is to make the tool