search for: s10u7

uname -a SunOS i7 5.11 snv_114 i86pc i386 i86xpv The box is a core i7 with 6GB of RAM. The command virt-install --name 10u7 --ram 1024 --hvm --file /guests/10u7 --os-type=solaris os-variant=solaris10 --location /export/iso/sol-10-u7-ga-x86-dvd.iso get as far as opening the VNC client, when I select Solaris from grub, the OS starts to boot then panics, closing the session. So I

...pools. We originally skipped mpxio due to the cfgadm issues, even though we''d have preferred to have the reliablity enhancements. Those issues seem to have re-appeared in various guises (e.g. bug 6948701, nominally fixed in s10u9). Due to the need to inter-operate (zfs send) with other s10u7 machines, I don''t think moving to update 9 is an option (yet), nor is OSOL or SXCE. Bottom line: Do ZFS / mpxio / cfgadm issues still make mpxio an iffy proposition as a reliability enhancement? Is there a patch set that addresses ZFS / cfgadm / mpxio issues for s10u7? TIA. Bryan --...

Maybe someone can share that script with me? Full problem i''m trying to investigate - my S10u7 get I\O error when accessing LUN on EMC cx480, but only if LUN created on raid6 raid group. When I create one on raid5 or raid10 everything goes fine. -- ____________ Voropaev Pavel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pip...

Dear all, Background: I have a ZFS volume with the incorrect volume blocksize for the filesystem (NTFS) that it is supporting. This volume contains important data that is proving impossible to copy using Windows XP Xen HVM that "owns" the data. The disparity in volume blocksize (current set to 512bytes!!) is causing significant performance problems. Question : Is there a way to

For Solaris 10 5/09... There are supposed to be performance improvements if you create a zpool on a full disk, such as one with an EFI label. Does the same apply if the full disk is used with an SMI label, which is required to boot? I am trying to determine the trade-off, if any, of having a single rpool on cXtYd0s2, if I can even do that, and improved performance compared to having two

I just ran zpool scrub on an active pool on an x4170 running S10U7 with the latest patches and iostat immediately dropped to 0 for all the pool devices and all processes associated with that device where hard locked, e.g., kill -9 on a zpool status processes was ineffective. However, other zpool on the system, such as the root pool, continued to work. Neither ini...

I''m using Solaris 10u6 updated to u7 via patches, and I have a pool with a mirrored pair and a (shared) hot spare. We reconfigured disks a while ago and now the controller is c4 instead of c2. The hot spare was originally on c2, and apparently on rebooting it didn''t get found. So, I looked up what the new name for the hot spare was, then added it to the pool with "zpool