Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "qdaobj".
Did you mean:
dmaobj
2006 Mar 11
2
weird! QDA does not depend on priors?
Hi all,
If I run LDA on the same data (2-class classification) with default(no
priors specified in the lda function) vs. "prior=c(0.5, 0.5)", the results
are different.
The (0.5, 0.5) priors give better 1-classify-to-1 rate, and the proportional
priors(default, no priors specified in the lda function) give better
0-classify-to-0 rate, for both training and testing data sets.
However,