search for: particullari

Hi, I'm wondering if samba supports NTLMv2, particullary NTLMv2 session security. But I can't even get NTLM-only to work :(. I'm trying to increase lmcompatibilitylevel, but I can't connect to the samba server anymore when I set it to 2 or higher ("Send NTLM authenication only"). I'm using HEAD CVS of today, and my smb.conf looks like this: [global]

I'm trying to use Rprof() to identify bottlenecks and speed up a particullary slow section of code which reads in a portion of a tif file and compares each of the values to values of predictors used for model fitting. I've written up an example that anyone can run. Generally temp would be a section of a tif read into a data.frame and used later for other processing. The first portion

Hi to everyone, I'm a PhD student and I'm involved in non parametric analyses of hierarchical models. I tried to use package DPpackage on my data, but I encountered some problems in interpreting ouputs. Can anybody help me? The problem can be remued as follows: I have a logit hierarchical model for survival (i.e. binary response) in patients affected by heart failure (the court

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Attached is a patch to add a progress meter for ssh-keygen similar to the one in the commercial ssh1. Was this left out of the OpenBSD version because of security concerns? Regards, Damien Miller - -- | "Bombay is 250ms from New York in the new world order" - Alan Cox | Damien Miller - http://www.mindrot.org/ | Email: djm at mindrot.org

Am 21.06.2017 um 00:50 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: > On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 23:35 +0200, Achim Gottinger via samba wrote: >> Can you do this against the secrets.keytab in Samba's private/ dir? >>> You can reset the Samba machine account pw with >>> ./source4/scripting/devel/chgtdcpass, but: >>> - it wont be packaged so you will have to build Samba and tell it

Hi All, whilst not being an expert on iptables, the below ouput of iptables -L seems too insecure to me. Does anyone agree.? Perhaps I'm not understanding it as well as I think I am.? Please give your thoughts on this. Cheers. Mark Sargent. [root at localhost racket]# iptables -L Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination RH-Firewall-1-INPUT all

21.06.2017 11:45, L.P.H. van Belle via samba пишет: > I suggest before you upgrade do a very good read here. > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba#Notable_Enhancements_and_Changes > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Features_added/changed_(by_release) > And a summerize version for with all parameter changes as of upgrade from 4.2 up to 4.6 >