search for: opti

On Tue, 21 May 2024, Opty wrote: > Hello, > > can anyone confirm that OpenSSH server doesn't log client disconnect > without SSH_MSG_DISCONNECT? OpenSSH logs the disconnection regardless of whether the client sends SSH_MSG_DISCONNECT or just drops the connection. A little more information may be logged from the disconnect packet if it was sent, but there should always be a

On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 6:29?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > OpenSSH logs the disconnection regardless of whether the client sends > SSH_MSG_DISCONNECT or just drops the connection. > > A little more information may be logged from the disconnect packet > if it was sent, but there should always be a "Connection closed by ..." > message regardless. I

* Florian Bruhin <me at the-compiler.org> [2013-09-17 15:35:01 +0200]: > Heya, > > I recently bought an Opti-UPS[1] ValueSeries 575C and now I'm trying > to write a NUT driver for it. > [...] I started reading through all drivers using the same baudrate, and the powercom protocol and driver looked really familiar! I then got it to work by doing some minimal changes to it. After cleaning up and...

Hello, Some time ago i bought 2 OPTI UPS devices, but was really sad to see the page about the OPTI protocol on the nut page. But i don't wanted to give up :) So i sniffed the serial communication using the windows application/driver and found out that these PS (PowerSeries) devices are different than the ES series mentioned on t...

On Sun, 26 May 2024, Opty wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 6:29?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 21 May 2024, Opty wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > can anyone confirm that OpenSSH server doesn't log client disconnect > > > without SSH_MSG_DISCONNECT? > > > > OpenSSH logs the disconnection regardless of

On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 3:03?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > On Wed, 29 May 2024, Opty wrote: > > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 4:18?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > > Yeah, you're adding a new thing that will be logged. IMO you should > > > try to figure out why the "Connection closed" message that is present > >

Heya, after I bought an OptiUPS VS 575C and discovering it won't work with Linux (silly me) I sniffed the protocol, found out it's very similiar to the protocol in the powercom driver, so I ended up adding support for that UPS to that driver. The patch is against the current git HEAD and works fine for me since weeks...

...iled to detect that protocol variant. Okay, will read a bit. I contacted a friend of mine who has a logic analyzer, so I can figure out if it's actually a standard serial connection, and if so I'll try to find a Windows machine and sniff the serial connection. :) The custom cable with the optiups driver didn't work out by the way. I probably should've checked the original cable first... if it's a standard RS232 DB9 connection, I might have fried something now when connecting UPS DSR (Input) to PC Tx and UPS DTR and RTS (Output) to PC GND. (Okay, after researching the pins it...

Hi! (first of all, FAQ tells me I should mention "queequeg" :P) I recently bought the UPS mentioned in the subject, assuming it'd work with Linux somehow, and the protocol will soon be something common -- turns out I was wrong. Website of the UPS: http://www.opti-ups.com/ -> USA -> Click on the big banner when it turns up (turns out I can't like to it directly, probably needs some cookie for the language selection -.-) It came with some "Sentinel" software for Windows. Calling the optiups driver with -h revealed something about a custo...

On Aug 26, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Florian Bruhin wrote: > queequeg Subtlety is key :-) > It came with some "Sentinel" software for Windows. Hmm, not sure if this is similar to software we have seen before. > Also, what does the red color mean in the compability table? Anything > that's not supported, or is it just "you have to solder your own cable > but then you

On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 6:02?PM Opty <opty77 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 3:03?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 29 May 2024, Opty wrote: > > > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 4:18?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > > > Yeah, you're adding a new thing that will be logged. IMO you should > >

Hi Jan, > I've been looking into how to make llvm bitcode files smaller. There is one > simple change that appears to shrink linked bitcode files by about 15%. See > this spreadsheet for some rough data: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjRrJHQc4_bddEtJdjdIek5fMDdIdFFIZldZXzdWa0E the improvement is wonderful! ... > In any case, the patch is attached if

On 18 July 2011 15:23, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > Looks like that break came > from http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=135154 > Judging by this ArrayRef ctor you should be able to simplify those calls by > changing the last two arguments from "&foo, 1" to, simply, "foo". I've done this in r135472. Jay.

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:12:47AM +0100, Jay Foad wrote: > On 18 July 2011 15:23, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > Looks like that break came > > from http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=135154 > > Judging by this ArrayRef ctor you should be able to simplify those calls by > > changing the last two arguments from

On Wed, 29 May 2024, Opty wrote: > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 4:18?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > Yeah, you're adding a new thing that will be logged. IMO you should > > try to figure out why the "Connection closed" message that is present > > in the debug log you sent is not making to to your syslog. > > If I change LogLevel in

On Fri, 31 May 2024, Opty wrote: > > 9.3p2, 64-bit Slackware 15.0 package which uses two patches but they > > look LogLevel-safe to me, you can check at > > http://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware64-15.0/patches/source/openssh/ > > 9.7p1 built from source without TCP wrappers and still no 'Connection > closed' at 'LogLevel INFO'. You might be

I have a new dell t105(opty 1210's with 4 gigs of ram..sata hdd's and sata dvd-rom). I can bot to the Cent 5 64 bit dvd fine but once it asks where the install image is i tell it cd-rom..then it rejects the dvd spits it out and tells me it's not there. the same happens on 32 bit. I have downloaded centos5 twice now, md5 verified..and even burned at 1x(that took forever). Any

Hi all, I've been looking into how to make llvm bitcode files smaller. There is one simple change that appears to shrink linked bitcode files by about 15%. See this spreadsheet for some rough data: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjRrJHQc4_bddEtJdjdIek5fMDdIdFFIZldZXzdWa0E The change is in how operand ids are encoded in bitcode files. Rather than use an "absolute

...SV-Systeme AG. I already sent a version to Russell Kroll (2006-04-09), without no response and I cannot find support for Zinto in svn until now. I found a discussion on this list about the Xanto from ONLINE, but the Zinto seems to use different commands. The commands are quite similar to those for Opti-UPS, so I decided not to fork, but to patch optiups. Where I found differences, I added if(testvar(OPTI_ZINTO)). As soon as someone adds another device with similar commands, one could decide how to differentiate within the driver (where to use select-case). What do you think? Yours, Matthias ----...

Hi all, after a half day searching for an error, sniffing and upgrading to the newest shorewall version I give up and the problem to you. I have following configuration in my /etc/shorewall/masq: #INTERFACE SOURCE ADDRESS vlan7::10.231.0.0/16 192.168.222.0/24 10.231.113.30 vlan7 192.168.222.0/24 10.1.0.38 Towards a