search for: nuisances

*Dear experts,* Please excuse me for disturbing... Right now I am struggling with GLM a bit... Would you be so kind to provide me a solution on using nuisance variables. The problem is that I have data on Depression (volumetric measurements of different brain regions) and I want to include age, gender and education as nuisance parameters in the model. In the other words I would like to model the

Hi, I am new to R, so I am unsure of the formula to set up this analysis. I would like to run a linear model with a continuous dependent variable (brain volume) and a continuous independent variable (age) while controlling for a categorical nuisance variable (gender). Age and brain volume are correlated. There are no gender differences in age but there are significant gender differences in brain

Hola! Starting with rw1071, just after starting Rgui the scope is not with Rconsole, but some other place. This means I have to do a mouse click in the Rconsole before starting to write the first command. Since I always forget this, I end up writing the first command twice. This is of course only a minor nuisance, but why is focus no longer set to Rconsole window when start-up? This is on

Hello group, Can someone please put me through how to estimate the nuisance parameters (Saturation parameter and radius) for the Geyer saturation process? It seems quite confusing to me how these parameters are achieved, but they are very important in determining the interaction between points in a point process. I am using Spatstat package. Thanks. neba [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R-experts, Please, excuse me for disturbing... I tried to find the answer to my question in archives without any result... I assume, this is going to look like a stupid question... I have dataset of different brain structures within two groups of subjects. But unfortunately these groups are not matched by age and gender. Would you be so kind to suggest me how (using which formula) can I

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1428 Summary: Banner output can be a nuisance with non-interactive use Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.3p2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

I have the following dataset: 96 plots 12 varieties 2 time points The experiment is arranged as follows: A single plot has two varieties tested on it. With respect to time points, plots come in 3 kinds: (1) varietyA, timepoint#1 vs. variety B, timepoint#1 (2) varietyA timepoint #2 vs. varietyB timepoint #2 (3) varietyA timepoint #1 vs. variety A timepoint#2 - there are 36 of each kind

HI sorry to be a nuisance to all!!! how can i see the code of a particular function? e.g. nnet just as an example

Hi, I have been using R to do multiple analyses of variance with two covariates, but recently found that the results in SPSS were very different. I have check several books and web resources and I think that both methods are correct, but I am less familiar with R, so I was hoping someone could offer some suggestions. Oddly simple ANOVA is the same in SPSS and R. Including covariates improves the

On 11 June 2017 at 12:05, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > On 11 June 2017 at 11:56, Dipanjan Das via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I can't pass var_value to a function accepting uint64_t. LLVM complains > > about broken function call. > > Well, yes. var_value has type "ConstantInt *", not uint64_t. Assuming

The current coxme code has functions that depend on bdsmatrix and others that depend on Matrix, both those pacakges define S4 methods for diag. When loaded, the message appears: replacing previous import ?diag? when loading ?Matrix? Questions: 1. Do I need to worry about this? If so, what can I do about it? I suppose I could add an importFrom directive, but it will be a pain unless there

On Jul 23, 2011, at 5:37 AM, FlyLanguage wrote: > Yes, but who's mainline? Is the plan to have a centralized repo with a mainline branch that everybody pushes to, or the a linux style model where some person has an official mainline to which he pulls? > > It's quite different things. >From my interpretation of what Chris has said about this, it would be the former

Hi, this is not a genuine Dovecot bug, more a nuisance. It applies to OpenSuse 13.2 but maybe also to other Linux's. The standard installation of Dovecot (especially 10-ssl.conf) places the certificate dovecot.pem in /etc/ssl/certs. Sometimes during updates does OpenSuse renew all certificates in /etc/ssl/certs and erases dovecot.pem. This blocks further access to the mailbox. I found a

On 11 June 2017 at 11:32, Nikodemus Siivola <nikodemus at random-state.net> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 7:49 PM, Dipanjan Das via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On 11 June 2017 at 07:53, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Sounds like you're looking for reinterpret_cast: http://en.cp

On 11 June 2017 at 14:04, don hinton <hintonda at gmail.com> wrote: > Assuming you know it's a 64 bit value, and the function you are calling > takes a uint64_t, try this: > The values from the test program are of type: i32/i32*/i32**. Can't I interpret these as uint64_t some way? > > Value* args[] = {store_inst->getOperand(0)}; > > > On Sun, Jun 11,

> > library will be kept separately and will be required to be installed BEFORE > > icecast is built. Similar to the dependency on libshout that ices has. > > But I'm not sure about this. There's nothing in those libraries of any > use to anything but icecast code itself, so I don't see why it should > be installed on users' systems. It's true that

Hi, Until now I've been a happy user of CentOS. Everything just works(tm), and I don't care if application versions are slightly outdated. Next week I have to give a series of classes for a company that recently made the switch to Linux. On schedule is a one-week course for Writer and Calc. And right now I discover that one crucial function of Calc, "fill series",

Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote: > For 2.6 to really be a useful, we need this bug fixed: > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=4963 > > Would it be possible to get this merged into 2.6? While we're at it, what about: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3239 This is a real nuisance, as people regularly build LLVM in a way (--enable-pic, which even is the default now) which

>>>> there's a difference between users of LLVM (which you discuss here) >>>> and developers of LLVM (people writing transforms etc). I agree >>>> that for users it just changes one oddity for another. However for >>>> developers it should make things simpler by making the IR more uniform. >>> >>> As a developer, it would be

For 2.6 to really be a useful, we need this bug fixed: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=4963 Would it be possible to get this merged into 2.6? -Tomas