search for: malfeasance

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "malfeasance".

2004 Dec 29
2
So what if I can't dial out ... or in ... Asterisk just blows my mind!
...hange your message') exten => 500,6,ResponseTimeout(3) So I figgered out how to make selected conferences automatically record the "minutes," and I was SO PSYCHED!!!! But then I thought, what if I answer the phone and it's my ex-wife claiming that she's gonna sue me for malfeasance because of my new boyfriend, and I wanna make a recording of that call? How could I discreetly begin a recording of that call? Thanks, lane P.S. I don't gotta ex-wife, I'm just saying "what if?"
2015 Jan 19
6
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
I'm tracking down an X86 code generation malfeasance regarding BT (bit test) and I have some questions. This IR *matches* and then *X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT **is called:* %and = and i64 %shl, %val * ; (val & (1 << index)) != 0 ; *bit test with a *register* index This IR *does not match* and so *X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT *...
2015 Jan 19
2
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
...erated code wrong? > > You can give a C file if you are sure that it is reproducible with the > current clang. > > Thanks, > > Mehdi > > On Jan 18, 2015, at 5:13 PM, Chris Sears <chris.sears at gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm tracking down an X86 code generation malfeasance regarding BT (bit > test) and I have some questions. > > This IR *matches* and then *X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT **is called:* > > %and = and i64 %shl, %val * ; (val & (1 << index)) != 0 ; *bit > test with a *register* index > > > This IR *does not matc...
2009 Oct 04
1
offlist Re: AW: Urgently needed Exercise solutions related to PracticalData Analysis Using R Statisctial Software
Accepted and forgotten. It just reminds us to check on our prejudices once in a while. Also, I realized that my description was not entirely accurate. You actually had to click the link on the page you posted to get this: http://www.odesk.com/jobs/College-Assistance_~~dd7622f6bdef9177 I am an MSc. computer science student in a foreign university! Need help to solve the exercises in the following
2015 Jan 22
2
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
...>>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Mehdi >>> >>>> On Jan 18, 2015, at 5:13 PM, Chris Sears <chris.sears at gmail.com <mailto:chris.sears at gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm tracking down an X86 code generation malfeasance regarding BT (bit test) and I have some questions. >>>> >>>> This IR matches and then X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT is called: >>>> >>>> %and = and i64 %shl, %val ; (val & (1 << index)) != 0 ; bit test with a register index >&gt...