search for: m8s

...of these functions with 7 compilers: llvm-gcc, clang, Intel cc, Sun cc, various versions of gcc. We then looked for functions where a particular pair of compilers exhibited widely differing abilities to optimize. For example, consider this function: int ZZ_0000728f(int x,int y){return o1s(m8s(x,-2),(x?1:y));} gcc-3.4 can see that it always returns 0, and emits code doing that. On the other hand, llvm-gcc emits 228 bytes of object code (at -Os) to compute the same zeroes. The funny-named functions are little safe-math utilities that avoid undefined behavior for all inputs. "o...

...he machine would not see it and for some reason after hours and hours of trying I can't get a tekram 395UW and a 18gig scsi to be the boot drive and having failed I was stuck with IDE. I finally got tired of it being this way and decided to flash the motherboard which is a Micronics Invader ATX m8s-fin motherboard. Well dumb me I flashed it with the wrong bios. And I can't find the original bios on the net anywhere do any of you all have this motherboard and can send me the bios for it or possibly know where I can find it. Any of your help would be greatly appreciated. And before I flashe...

So it would appear that llvm-gcc and clang are both slower than gcc4 which is infamous for being slow at compiling code, and yes this is with a release build/--enable-optimizations. This seems to go against notes such as http://clang.llvm.org/features.html#performance which claim clang is signifcantly faster than gcc. Below are some times and the larger object files when compiling an i386

...s: > llvm-gcc, clang, Intel cc, Sun cc, various versions of gcc. > > We then looked for functions where a particular pair of compilers > exhibited widely differing abilities to optimize. For example, consider > this function: > > int ZZ_0000728f(int x,int y){return o1s(m8s(x,-2),(x?1:y));} > > gcc-3.4 can see that it always returns 0, and emits code doing that. On > the other hand, llvm-gcc emits 228 bytes of object code (at -Os) to > compute the same zeroes. > > The funny-named functions are little safe-math utilities that avoid > undefine...

...mpilers: > llvm-gcc, clang, Intel cc, Sun cc, various versions of gcc. > > We then looked for functions where a particular pair of compilers > exhibited widely differing abilities to optimize. For example, consider > this function: > > int ZZ_0000728f(int x,int y){return o1s(m8s(x,-2),(x?1:y));} > > gcc-3.4 can see that it always returns 0, and emits code doing that. On > the other hand, llvm-gcc emits 228 bytes of object code (at -Os) to > compute the same zeroes. > > The funny-named functions are little safe-math utilities that avoid > undefined beh...

...6.4 gig. Well the machine would not see it and for some reason after hours and hours of trying I can't get a tekram 395UW and a 18gig scsi to be the boot drive so I was stuck with IDE. I finally got tired of it being this way and decided to flash the motherboard which is a Micronics Invader ATX m8s-fin motherboard. Well dumb me I flashed it with the wrong bios. And I can't find the original bios on the net anywhere do any of you all have this motherboard and can send me the bios for it or possibly know where I can find it. Any of your help would be greatly appreciated. I would just hate t...

...st set up RH 5.2 on my PC and since I'll have cable soon I'll keep the PC on 24/24. So i'll need to secure the box so it doesn't gets hacked... what are the basic files I have to secure... or what can I install to secure the box in some way. I would like to give access to some of my m8s tho ... So I can't completely lock the incoming traffic .. Please help me out of this ... otherwise i'll have to go back to Windows and I don't want that :PPPPPP [mod: Please summarize in about a week OK? -- REW] tanx Slyoldfox Slynet@Pandora.be _____________________________________...

....1 at /Users/eduardocirilo/.gem/ruby/1.8, /Applications/EdUtils/Locomotive2/Bundles/standardRailsSept2006.locobundle/i386/lib/ruby/gems/1.8 Run `rake gems:install` to install the missing gems. MBPEduCirilo:kshema098 eduardocirilo$ What can I do to resolve this problem? I really need some help m8s. Regards, Ed -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocF...

...eb;1D7|+cr18*Mkmrg0={fuvG#oJ`X@3@(i*BuF#&Jmgym9_#e{Jub|0%aw zzqA8J{7LxpIi3CEz(Eah$%L@M>(x){lW07j>_0{d_>bX2MB_B`o8vzX9s3_3WBiWI z5r@C#p8qz5t8+5?6!$C|&j+8k_4;||-#Bbc;(UZXgXZ^NR>lpQi@1`#EBo6(zJ})W z=ig7}7RTWLJbseDdAEP#HBw;8u1RM6FG$OrpTq?;&L1EE=j;e^EScuQmSXi{=6?~e z-#?~Iy>on9)m8S){6DSZe@y#pE}rxGoB2!7$#WC9-0;=+0rmex;HEvq8u>D0{`k-S zHW?wTEm^HSL1w(Gka_&<zf1YGYF=aS_x}?Bx$nT)U(a8w=5qbn#`LH4`3ssazfCqE zQcL1GSmyePucG<=wS9#B%=MxercCcJ98cHJ?>`Yf@0s>~|JwjKzaB4{5PAN*4-{Or zCqH_pka<~I<=cOz`}}=_Rh*Ax>dSr4$|{eXQT@iZ!Reb2kB7&*9T>e^uaSS-40NEt KA;rC`m;XPXE...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking