search for: iotests

I created a share with the config I gave below. As you can see in pictures I have two Everyone at "Permission" and one Everyone at "Share" section. These permissions comes when i create a share.. One of them is definitely related to samba because it is in the "share" section, but I guess the other two permits are comes with "posix acl". But i did not add

Hi Folks, Looks like our LNT ARM buildbot with the vectorizer is running and producing good results. There are only 11 failures: FAIL: MultiSource/Applications/Burg/burg.execution_time (1 of 1104) FAIL: MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan.execution_time (2 of 1104) FAIL: MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon.execution_time (3 of 1104) FAIL:

Hi Renato, I've investigated a few of these for AArch64 recently, and some of the results will be applicable in the 32-bit world too. > MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/12-IOtest/iotest.execution_time This is because of disagreement between ABIs over whether "char" is signed. ARM says no, x86 says yes. >

Dear gluster experts, We have encountered a severe performance issue related to quota feature of gluster. My underlying fs is lvm with xfs format. The problem is if quota is enabled the io performance is about 26MB/s but with quota disabled the io performance is 216MB/s. Any one known what's the problem? BTW I have reproduce it several times and it is related to quota indeed. Here's the

I went to the site to subscribe again and ended up watching some of Jeremy's Google interviews. I particularly enjoyed the interview with James and the bow tie lesson at the end. :) So anyway, I recently upgraded my home network to end-to-end GbE. My clients are Windows XP SP3 w/hot fixes, and my Samba server is 3.5.6 atop vanilla kernel.org Linux 3.2.6 and Debian 6.0.6. With FDX fast

Knut Krüger via samba wrote: >> Limiting the linux-server's max cpu-speed had >> the most affect on performance: >> (limited to 1.6GHz instead of 2.4GHz) (33% limitation) >> > The server is equipped with an 6 core / 12 tread 3.6 GHz CPU (Intel Core > i7-980x and a Raid 10 Disk array. > The cpu is 90% idle (including webserver traffic and mailserver

> Limiting the linux-server's max cpu-speed had > the most affect on performance: > (limited to 1.6GHz instead of 2.4GHz) (33% limitation) The server is equipped with an 6 core / 12 tread 3.6 GHz CPU (Intel Core i7-980x   and  a Raid 10 Disk array. The cpu is 90% idle (including webserver traffic and mailserver traffic) during downloads. There is no encryption because the samba VM

This is a cover letter for a set of multi-project patch series all designed to implement 64-bit operations in NBD, and demonstrate interoperability of the new extension between projects. v1 of the project was attempted nearly a year ago: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-12/msg00453.html Since then, I've addressed a lot of preliminary cleanups in libnbd to make it easier

...client-Fix-regression-when-server-sends-garbage.patch [bz#1495474] - kvm-fix-build-failure-in-nbd_read_reply_entry.patch [bz#1495474] - kvm-nbd-client-avoid-spurious-qio_channel_yield-re-entry.patch [bz#1495474] - kvm-nbd-client-avoid-read_reply_co-entry-if-send-failed.patch [bz#1495474] - kvm-qemu-iotests-improve-nbd-fault-injector.py-startup-p.patch [bz#1495474] - kvm-qemu-iotests-test-NBD-over-UNIX-domain-sockets-in-08.patch [bz#1495474] - kvm-block-nbd-client-nbd_co_send_request-fix-return-code.patch [bz#1495474] - Resolves: bz#1495474 (Fail to quit source qemu when do live migration after mirror...

...e-info-for-vcpus.patch [bz#1430802] - Resolves: bz#1430802 (Enhance qemu to present virtual L3 cache info for vcpus) * Wed Mar 15 2017 Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin at redhat.com> - rhev-2.6.0-28.el7_3.7 - kvm-block-check-full-backing-filename-when-searching-pro.patch [bz#1425125] - kvm-qemu-iotests-Don-t-create-fifos-pidfiles-with-protoc.patch [bz#1425125] - kvm-qemu-iotest-test-to-lookup-protocol-based-image-with.patch [bz#1425125] - kvm-target-i386-Don-t-use-cpu-migratable-when-filtering-.patch [bz#1413897] - Resolves: bz#1413897 (cpu flag nonstop_tsc is not present in guest with host-pas...

...n-when-server-sends-garbage.patch > [bz#1495474] - kvm-fix-build-failure-in-nbd_read_reply_entry.patch > [bz#1495474] - kvm-nbd-client-avoid-spurious-qio_channel_yield-re-entry.patch > [bz#1495474] - kvm-nbd-client-avoid-read_reply_co-entry-if-send-failed.patch > [bz#1495474] - kvm-qemu-iotests-improve-nbd-fault-injector.py-startup-p.patch > [bz#1495474] - kvm-qemu-iotests-test-NBD-over-UNIX-domain-sockets-in-08.patch > [bz#1495474] - kvm-block-nbd-client-nbd_co_send_request-fix-return-code.patch > [bz#1495474] - Resolves: bz#1495474 (Fail to quit source qemu when do live > mi...

Hi Renato, I noticed the bot yesterday. Thanks for working on this! On Feb 19, 2013, at 7:45 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Looks like our LNT ARM buildbot with the vectorizer is running and producing good results. Do you have a base run with vectorization turned off? So we could see where we are degrading things? When you say good

I have two identical servers. The only difference is that the first one has Maxtor 250G drives and the second one has Seagate 320G drives. OS: CentOS-4.4 (fully patched) CPU: dual Opteron 280 Memory: 16GB Raid card: 3ware 9550Sx-8LP Raid volume: 4-disk Raid 5 with NCQ and Write Cache enabled On the first server I have decent performance. Nothing spectacular, but good enough. The second one

I have two identical servers. The only difference is that the first one has Maxtor 250G drives and the second one has Seagate 320G drives. OS: CentOS-4.4 (fully patched) CPU: dual Opteron 280 Memory: 16GB Raid card: 3ware 9550Sx-8LP Raid volume: 4-disk Raid 5 with NCQ and Write Cache enabled On the first server I have decent performance. Nothing spectacular, but good enough. The second one

Hi Eric, I wonder if you have any thoughts about this build failure in tests/test-nozero.sh? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48259627 log: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9762/48259762/build.log The error is “nozero6.img was trimmed by mistake”. I added “set -x” to the script earlier today so we can see exactly what's wrong, and it is that: ++ stat

...at -c %b nozero2.img > ++ stat -c %b nozero6.img > + test 4096 '!=' 2048 > + echo 'nozero6.img was trimmed by mistake' Hmm, maybe it is file-system dependent (not all filesystems reserve the same amount of space for a sparse file - that's something that qemu iotests keep on hitting). > > AFAICT what this means is that nozero2.img is growing during the test > (from 2048 to 4096 blocks). When I run the test locally this file > stays at 2048 blocks the whole time, and the test does not fail. Growing a small amount but still being sparse is differe...

...file is too long or provide way to fix a "too long" backing file.) * Mon May 16 2016 Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin at redhat.com> - rhev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.14 - kvm-blockjob-Allow-nested-pause.patch [bz#1329543] - kvm-block-Pause-block-jobs-in-bdrv_drain_all.patch [bz#1329543] - kvm-qemu-iotests-Test-that-stop-doesn-t-drain-block-jobs.patch [bz#1329543] - kvm-blockjob-Update-function-name-in-comments.patch [bz#1329543] - kvm-virtio-blk-use-blk_io_plug-unplug-for-Linux-AIO-batc.patch [bz#1327613] - Resolves: bz#1327613 (AIO is processing only 1 request, even if >1 requests in virtio)...

Knut Krüger via samba wrote: > What is the maximum speed for download from a samba share? > > I have a 100 kbit/s Internet > > The maximum speed for a download from my webserver with samba is about > 25.000 kbit/s > > The bottleneck is the samba access. Without samba I can download with > 100 kbit/s > > So the question? is it possible to get more speed or is

What is the maximum speed for download from a samba share? I have a 100 kbit/s Internet The maximum speed for a download from my  webserver with samba is about 25.000 kbit/s The bottleneck is the samba access.  Without samba  I can download with 100 kbit/s So the question? is it possible to get more speed or is this the maximum speed with samba? I tried a lot of hints for samba tuning but

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 Summary: Slow Performance over Network rsync Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: Joerg.Grube at Gmx.De