search for: interjecting

> I tend to disagree. It normal human conversation it wouldn't make much > sense to have 2 people talking over each other at the same time. Thus, > it most scenarios you would have only one talker anyway. Additionally, > encode->decode/mix/encode->decode isn't a very efficient CPU process for > a server, it's complicated to keep timing correct and it has a

I meant to send the message to the list but the default is to reply to the sender, which I find a big hassle. I know, I should being using a proper email client and not Outlook Express. > Now that 2.2.0 is out, we can update metadata on-the-fly. http://server.ip:port/admin?&mode=updinfo&song=ACDC-Back_In_Black This syntax is supported but it only shows up on the Icecast2 server

From: Ajay <ajay at unisoftindia.net> > and hope that Redhat accepts the existance of this project and finds a > way to utilize it for good of both. You were doing fine up until this point. I think the speculation on Red Hat needs to stop, and I don't know why you had to interject this as well. From what I've seen, I don't think Red Hat is in any legal position to accept

The R translation teams have done a great job in making R usable for people who do not have English as their mother tongue. However, even within English speaking countries, there are groups which have trouble with the language, and it may be valuable to support the Sociolects of these groups too. Thanks to a generous contribution from Lars Polifo, these features will be made available in an

>True, but there is one critical place where it's necessary to mix at least >two streams--when someone's trying to break into a stream. If speaker A >goes on and on and speaker B (or C, D, E, F...) wants to interject or >interrupt, who do they do it without inband without mixing? It doesn't have to be done that way. You can simply have the server echo the voice streams

I am new to R and I am trying to do a monte carlo simulation where I generate data and interject error then test various cut points; however, my output was garbage (at x equal zero, I did not get .50) I am basically testing the performance of classifiers. Here is the code: n <- 1000; # Sample size fitglm <- function(sigma,tau){ x <- rnorm(n,0,sigma) intercept <- 0 beta

Hi all,   can I freely create an account for the Wiki and do changes? Or should I notify someone (Rowland)? I found a small error in https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/User_Home_Folders . The wiki mentions as rights on the share Read and Execute for Authenticated Users, but on that level I see only Full Control, Change and Read. My assumption is that it should be Change and Read for Authenticated

On 10/29/13 07:01 AM, Richard Smith wrote: > > [As an aside: I use libc++ for my Clang development (on Ubuntu Linux), > and it works for me (tm). This is with libstdc++ providing the ABI > pieces, rather than libc++abi or libcxxrt, though.] libc++ "works" for us as well, but it can't self host. I don't know if your "works" and my definition of works is

Hi Talin, Sorry to interject - > For example, suppose I have a type "String or (float, float, float)" - that > is, a union of a string and a 3-tuple of floats. Most of the time what LLVM > will see is { i1; { float; float; float; } } because that's bigger than { > i1; String* }. LLVM won't even know there's a pointer in there, except > during those brief

Greetings, I had a question about the $super argument that I wasn''t able to find in documentation, searching etc. What exactly is the $super argument. Is it a reference to the super class''s prototype function? Or is it an instantiated object of the super class that is passed to the subclass''s method? I am completely confuzzled on this one, my typical

All, I'm finding the current layout a bit frustrating, not to mention that it breaks all the documentation. We currently have modules laid out like this: llvm/trunk/... llvm/branches/... llvm/tags/... stacker/trunk/... stacker/branches/... stacker/tags/... and similarly for all the other modules (test-suite, java, poolalloc, etc.). Unfortunately, this "standard"

Hi All, I''m using shorewall on my laptop(2 NIC) to connect my desktop to the Internal LAN. For some reason, MS''s SQL query analyser is not able to connect to the SQL server. I alway get the "Server does not exist" I even tried to connect to it using IP address rather than netbios name and it still doesn''t work. All of the access is fine. (eg: WEB/ping etc)

On 11/28/13 6:07 PM, Mikael Lyngvig wrote: > Hi, > > It will probably take a few weeks or a month before the "Mapping > High-Level Constructs to LLVM IR" document is ready for prime time. > Until then, you can review and study it at this URL: > > https://github.com/archfrog/llvm-doc/blob/master/MappingHighLevelConstructsToLLVMIR.rst > > > Please notice

Hi Philip, Thanks for your great list of ideas for the document! I don't really have a scope for the document beyond: If it something that requires mapping from high-level to LLVM IR, I think it should go into the document. I started out using C++ examples because many people know C++. I am personally mostly an advocate of statically checked languages but I don't see that as a reason

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Joshua Warner <joshuawarner32 at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Talin, > > Sorry to interject - > > >> For example, suppose I have a type "String or (float, float, float)" - >> that is, a union of a string and a 3-tuple of floats. Most of the time what >> LLVM will see is { i1; { float; float; float; } } because that's

Hi, > How do either of these prevent DWARF exception handling from working? if you throw an exception using your proposed unwind implementation, then it wouldn't be caught by dwarf catch/cleanup regions (eg: invoke). > Would a landing pad expecting to get an exception object from the > exception intrinsics fail to get one in the case of an unwind and > crash? The landing pad

Hi, Can I interject something at this point. Can I suggest that invoke/unwind be renamed DWARF_invoke/DWARF_unwind to warn the unwary that if they want lightweight exception handling in their Python/ML/whatever implementation they should use some other method. PS. Kenneth, why don't you just use setjmp/longjmp directly. Or, if you want, I can email you my lightweight versions if you want,

Is there a way to get the undefined-behavior sanitizer to include stack traces in their error messages? Also, I'm sometimes seeing raw addresses where I'd expect to see file names and line numbers. Do I need to point this sanitizer to llvm-symbolizer? And if so, how? Thanks, Greg

Reid, On Jun 30, 2007, at 3:36 PM, Reid Spencer wrote: > All, > > I'm finding the current layout a bit frustrating, not to mention > that it > breaks all the documentation. We currently have modules laid out like > this: > > llvm/trunk/... > llvm/branches/... > llvm/tags/... > > stacker/trunk/... > stacker/branches/... >

Hi, I’d just like to interject to say that building within Visual Studio isn’t really that bad. Running the lit tests is a bit painful because the LLVM build tools that are integrated with the build system don’t play nice with msbuild. Particularly, I’ve never been able to actually cancel an invocation of lit or tablegen via visual studio. That said, there is a huge upside to building with