Displaying 20 results from an estimated 89 matches for "group3".
Did you mean:
groups
2008 Jul 07
1
GLM, LMER, GEE interpretation
...-18.9843 -4.1129 0.3816 6.0047 18.1858
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) -3.4274 0.4641 -7.386 1.10e-12 ***
capacity 0.9931 0.1281 7.754 9.55e-14 ***
group2 0.7242 0.6337 1.143 0.25392
group3 2.0264 0.6168 3.286 0.00112 **
capacity:group2 -0.1523 0.1764 -0.863 0.38864
capacity:group3 -0.3885 0.1742 -2.231 0.02633 *
---
Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
(Dispersion parameter for...
2009 Sep 20
2
missing level of a nested factor results in an NA in lm output
...Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 12.6487 0.4037 31.331 2.58e-11 ***
FEATURE4227 -0.3271 0.4944 -0.661 0.52325
FEATURE6374 -1.0743 0.4944 -2.173 0.05492 .
GROUP1 -1.2641 0.5709 -2.214 0.05120 .
GROUP2 -0.2359 0.5709 -0.413 0.68825
GROUP3 -1.3081 0.5709 -2.291 0.04492 *
GROUP4 -0.5867 0.5709 -1.028 0.32836
FEATURE4227:GROUP1 1.5651 0.6993 2.238 0.04915 *
FEATURE6374:GROUP1 1.1435 0.6993 1.635 0.13302
FEATURE4227:GROUP2 0.4372 0.6993 0.625 0.54577
FEATURE6374:GROUP2 0...
2017 Oct 03
0
samba performance & ACL behavior
...vfs objects = glusterfs
glusterfs:volume = vol
glusterfs:logfile = /var/log/samba/glusterfs-vol.log
glusterfs:loglevel = 7
path = /toplevel
public = no
writable = yes
guest ok = no
valid users = @"group1",@"group2",@"group3"
kernel share modes = no
*Question 1:*
*Are there any performance concerns with the above settings in the
smb.conf?*
The ACL's on /toplevel are:
# getfacl toplevel
# file: toplevel
# owner: root
# group: root
user::rwx
group::r-x
group:group1:rwx
group:group2:r--
group:group3:r...
2005 Mar 21
1
rpart memory problem
Hi everyone,
I have a problem using rpart (R 2.0.1 under Unix)
Indeed, I have a large matrix (9271x7), my response variable is numeric and all
my predictor variables are categorical (from 3 to 8 levels).
Here is an example :
> mydata[1:5,]
distance group3 group4 group5 group6 group7 group8
pos_1 0.141836040224967 a c e a g g
pos_501 0.153605961621317 a a a a g g
pos_1001 0.152246705384699 a c e a g g
pos_1501 0.145563737522463 a c e a...
2009 Aug 28
1
how to explain the interaction terms regarding "treatment contrast" of lm model
...1 2.890875
5 b group1 3.853280
6 b group1 4.113585
7 b group1 3.043250
8 b group1 3.800920
9 c group1 5.394305
10 c group1 5.004290
11 c group1 4.651435
12 c group1 4.286650
13 d group1 4.773440
14 d group1 3.982200
15 d group1 5.718690
16 d group1 4.803815
.....
45 d group3 8.021240
46 d group3 7.641685
47 d group3 7.519445
48 d group3 9.514580
then:
>tapply(val,list(group,sub),mean)
a b c d
group1 3.506216 3.702759 4.834170 4.819536
group2 4.831503 5.246833 5.930116 6.649191
group3 6.233062 6.648325 7.787651 8.174238
>...
2005 Jun 24
1
lme4 extracting individual variance components
...tions
(VarCorr(m1)@reSumry$group1) but I was not able to find a way to
extract the other components individually.
To extract the Residuals I tried: (ranef(m1)@ stdErr) which
unfortunately did not work.
Thank you very much for your help!
Thomas
My model:
> m1<- lmer(y ~ trtt + (trtt-1|group3) + (trtt-1|group2) +
(trtt-1|group1), d1)
> m1
Linear mixed-effects model fit by REML
Formula: y ~ trtt + (trtt - 1 | group3) + (trtt - 1 | group2) + (trtt -
1 | group1)
Data: d1
AIC BIC logLik MLdeviance REMLdeviance
1819.454 2003.915 -874.7269 1736.421 1749....
2011 Apr 30
1
More flexible aggregate / eval
Dear list,
I would like to do some calculation using different grouping variables.
My 'df' looks like this:
# Some data
set.seed(345)
id <- seq(200,400, by=10)
ids <- sample(substr(id,1,1))
group1 <- rep(1:3, each=7)
group2 <- rep(1:2, c(10,11))
group3 <- rep(1:4, c(5,5,5,6))
df <- data.frame(id, ids, group1, group2, group3)
df <- rbind(df, df, df)
df$time <- seq(2009, 2011, each=3)
df$x1 <- sample(0:100, 63)
df$x2 <- sample(44:234, 63)
head(df)
## For group1
d1 <- aggregate(cbind(x1, x2) ~
group1 + i...
2005 Jan 27
3
clustering
Hi,
I just get a question (sorry if it is a dumb one) and I "phase" my
question in the following R codes:
group1<-rnorm(n=50, mean=0, sd=1)
group2<-rnorm(n=20, mean=1, sd=1.5)
group3<-c(group1,group2)
Now, if I am given a dataset from group3, what method (discriminant
analysis, clustering, maybe) is the best to cluster them by using R.
The known info includes: 2 clusters, normal distribution (but the
parameters are unknown).
Thanks,
Ed
2016 Dec 01
1
how to set different permission for samba share
Hi all,
I'm on FreeBSD11 and I install samba36.
I have some users and groups.
user1, user2 -> group1
user3->group3
user4,user5->group4
I have a share: /extra/samba-test
Access to the share is :
user1->writable
user4->readable
group4->writable
group3->writable
My config file is:
[samba-share]
comment= aa
path= /extra/samba-test
public= no
browsable= yes
writable=no
write list=@group4 @group3...
2008 May 11
1
positioning of color key in levelplot
...group1 <- c(rep("A1", 40), rep("A2", 40))
group2 <-rep(c(rep("C1", 5), rep("C2", 5), rep("C3", 5), rep("C4", 5), rep("C5", 5), rep("C6", 5), rep("C7", 5), rep("C8", 5)),2)
num <- rnorm(80)
group3 <- rep(seq(0,4,1),16)
data <- data.frame(group1, group2, num, group3)
levelplot(num ~ as.factor(group3) * group2|group1, data=data,col.regions=rev(heat.colors(25)),
colorkey=list(space="right"), region=T, layout=c(1,2), scales=list(y=list(alternating=c(1,1,1))))...
2011 Aug 17
3
How to apply a function to subsets of a data frame *and* obtain a data frame again?
Dear all,
First, let's create some data to play around:
set.seed(1)
(df <- data.frame(Group=rep(c("Group1","Group2","Group3"), each=10),
Value=c(rexp(10, 1), rexp(10, 4), rexp(10, 10)))[sample(1:30,30),])
## Now we need the empirical distribution function:
edf <- function(x) ecdf(x)(x) # empirical distribution function evaluated at x
## The big question is how one can apply the empirical dist...
2020 Jun 16
2
Samba as a domain member:
Yes:
# getent group GROUP
group:x:17573:
# getent group group2
group2:x:11010:
# getent group GROUP3
group3:x:21178:
# wbinfo --group-info GROUP
group:x:17573:
# wbinfo -n GROUP
S-1-5-21-948789634-15155995-928725530-7573 SID_DOM_GROUP (2)
2008 Nov 24
1
No write permission if POSIX bits 0 on ZFS written by M$ Office - dos_mode returning r
...A group1 10 Nov 24 17:25 .
owner@:rwxpdDaARWc--s:fd-----:allow
group@:rwxpdDaARWc--s:fd-----:allow
group:group2:rwxpdDaARWcCos:fd-----:allow
... the file gets properly created with these permissions (because the user's
primary group is group3)
-rwxrwx---+ 1 userA group3 79258 Nov 24 17:26 f.xlsx
owner@:rwxpdDaARWc--s:-------:allow
group@:rwxpdDaARWc--s:-------:allow
group:group2:rwxpdDaARWcCos:-------:allow
now userB can overwrite the file and we get the following ACL:
----rwx--...
2007 Feb 14
2
Solaris 10 and "store dos attributes"
I'm having trouble with files being marked read-only in Windows because the
Solaris file owner does not have write-permissions on the file; group-write is
allowed:
-r--rw---- 1 user group 32 Feb 13 14:19 testfile.txt
I thought that setting "store dos attributes = yes" for this share would allow
the "read only" setting to be stored in extended attributes, but it
2011 Jul 06
1
How to compare ratio from multiple groups?
If I have 3 groups,and for each group,I get the ratio(e.g. incidence rate).
Now I wanna compare 3 ratio pairwise,and get the corresponding p values,i.e:
group1 vs group2 ,p value=?
group1 vs group3 ,p value=?
group2 vs group3 ,p value=?
Which statistical test should be used?
Thanks a lot for your help.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2008 Oct 26
0
LMER quasibinomial
...ntercept) 42.977 6.5557
Residual 26.845 5.1813
number of obs: 360, groups: subject, 90
Fixed effects:
Estimate Std. Error t value
(Intercept) -3.8628 1.2701 -3.041
capacity 1.1219 0.1176 9.542
group2 0.9086 1.7905 0.507
group3 2.3700 1.7936 1.321
capacity:group2 -0.1745 0.1610 -1.083
capacity:group3 -0.3807 0.1622 -2.348
Correlation of Fixed Effects:
(Intr) capcty group2 group3 cpct:2
capacity -0.322
group2 -0.709 0.228
gr...
2010 Nov 11
1
exploratory analysis of large categorical datasets
Dear List,
I am looking to perform exploratory analyses of two (relatively) large
datasets of categorical data. The first one is a binary 80x100 matrix, in
the form:
matrix(sample(c(0,1),25,replace=TRUE), nrow = 5, ncol=5, dimnames = list(c(
"group1", "group2","group3", "group4","group5"), c("V.1", "V.2", "V.3",
"V.4", "V.5")))
and the second one is a multistate 750x1500 matrix, with up to 15
*unordered* states per variable, in the form:
matrix(sample(c(1:15),25,replace=TRUE), nrow =...
2012 Mar 07
2
staging shutdowns
...m deploying NUT in a data center and I'm curious to know how others
have gone about staging the shutdown of various systems. The systems
are broken down into groups of importance, group1 being the most
important group4 being the least. In the event of an outage take down
group4 after 5 minutes, group3 after 10 minutes, group2 after 15, and
finally group4 after 20.
I've only been using NUT for a few days but I'm assuming I can
accomplish this with a combination multiple systems, upssched events.
Thanks!
--
Later,
Darin
2004 May 23
1
A (maybe)_ easy solution to global login script for group checking
...ipts directory)
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/reskit/tools/new/ifmember-o.asp
Then the script is:
@echo off
ifmember "DOMAIN\group1"
if not errorlevel 1 goto group2
net use r: \\SERVER\group1files
:group2
ifmember "DOMAIN\group2"
if not errorlevel 1 goto group3
net use s: \\SERVER\group2files
:group3
....
So according toi group the network drives get mapped. It's all in one login
script and makes things easy!
I couldn't find this in the archives so I thought I'd share this.
What's nice is that you have the ifmember only on the serve...
2016 Mar 31
4
rsync with overlay tree
...into 3 groups that have slightly different needs (minor mods in a couple of files).
So ideally I would have 4 directories:
/path/to/sync/common/ <- common files
/path/to/sync/group1/ <- group1 specific only
/path/to/sync/group2/ <- group2 specific only
/path/to/sync/group3/ <- group3 specific only
Then I'd run an rsync like:
rsync -av --overlay /path/to/sync/groupN \
/path/to/sync/common remotehost:
Thinking in terms of a list of files to be transferred, I would like:
- Anything present in common/ added to the file list; then
- Anything present in...