Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "filechanges".
Did you mean:
filechanged
2010 Feb 04
1
Using the 'WatchSubDirectories' setting in a .NET FileSystemWatcher with a Samba Share
Hi all,
I've just managed to upgrade to Samba 3.3 and am pretty ecstatic about
finding i can now use FileSystemWatcher to watch for file changes in a
directory. On a Windows system however, when I say 'watch $dir' with
watchsubdirectories == true and $dir/a/file.jpg is changed, I get a
filechanged notification - on Samba 3.3 this doesn't happen - does
anyone know if it's
2005 Aug 11
4
smbldap-tools unresovled problem.
Hi All,
I am current working on Samba + LDAP PDC in RHEL-4.
I some problem when doing the smbldap-useradd -w command.
When I have a WinXP box try to join the PDC,
smbldap-useradd -w "%u" will add a workstation account to the LDAP tree
with all POSIX attribute but without all the SambaSAMAccount attribute.
So, the WinXP box can find it's workstation account and wouldn't
2001 Apr 05
1
[Fwd: smbmount problems]
BTW, I am using samba-client-2.0.7-4 and Redhat Linux 6.1 (linux
2.2.12-20).
-Sudheer
Sudheer Tumuluru wrote:
> Hi,
> I have an NT machine running an application which refreshes a
> text file every minute or so with fresh data. The directory containing
> this file is shared so that I can do an smbmount. I have a linux machine
> which runs a program to interpret this file.
2015 Oct 28
4
RFC: Supporting macros in LLVM debug info
Hi,
I would like to implement macro debug info support in LLVM.
Below you will find 4 parts:
1. Background on what does it mean to debug macros.
2. A brief explanation on how to represent macro debug info in DWARF 4.0.
3. The suggested design.
4. A full example: Source -> AST -> LLVM IR -> DWARF.
Feel free to skip first two parts if you think you know the background.
2010 Feb 15
5
Hardisk cloning for centos-5.3
Hi,
I want to clone my hardisk containing the centos-5.3 OS and its swap
region on to new raw hardisk via network
either through ssh, tftp or ftp. How do i do that ?
Is there any Tool for that or will DD command be sufficient.I know that dd
command will have to be used on hardisk
with already existing partitions and not on raw disk.
Regards,
Premraj M
Disclaimer : This message is
2020 Feb 29
3
R 3.6.3 is released
The build system rolled up R-3.6.3.tar.gz (codename "Holding the Windsock") this morning.
The list below details the changes in this release.
You can get the source code from
http://cran.r-project.org/src/base/R-3/R-3.6.3.tar.gz
or wait for it to be mirrored at a CRAN site nearer to you.
Binaries for various platforms will appear in due course.
For the R Core Team,
Peter Dalgaard
2020 Feb 29
3
R 3.6.3 is released
The build system rolled up R-3.6.3.tar.gz (codename "Holding the Windsock") this morning.
The list below details the changes in this release.
You can get the source code from
http://cran.r-project.org/src/base/R-3/R-3.6.3.tar.gz
or wait for it to be mirrored at a CRAN site nearer to you.
Binaries for various platforms will appear in due course.
For the R Core Team,
Peter Dalgaard
2020 Feb 29
3
R 3.6.3 is released
The build system rolled up R-3.6.3.tar.gz (codename "Holding the Windsock") this morning.
The list below details the changes in this release.
You can get the source code from
http://cran.r-project.org/src/base/R-3/R-3.6.3.tar.gz
or wait for it to be mirrored at a CRAN site nearer to you.
Binaries for various platforms will appear in due course.
For the R Core Team,
Peter Dalgaard
2015 Nov 03
3
RFC: Supporting macros in LLVM debug info
> Do we really need to touch the AST? Or would it be reasonable to wire up the CGDebugInfo directly to the PPCallbacks, if it isn't already? (perhaps it is already wired up for other reasons?)
This sound as a good idea, I will check that approach.
PPCallbacks is only an interface, has nothing connected to it, but we will create a new class, which implement PPCallbacks, for macros. So we can
2015 Nov 03
2
RFC: Supporting macros in LLVM debug info
> Not necessarily, if we kept the macros in order in the list of macros attached to the CU, which I imagine we would.
OK, now I understand what you are aiming for. I really do not favor one on the other.
But, can you explain what is the advantage of the parent approach over the children approach?
If any, the children approach seems to be the one reduces the LLVM IR size, is not it?
Regards,
2015 Nov 05
2
RFC: Supporting macros in LLVM debug info
> Right - I was wondering if CGDebugInfo already implemented PPCallbacks or was otherwise being notified of PPCallback related things, possibly through a layer or two of indirection.
I checked the approach of skipping representing macros in AST, and communicate them directly from Parser to CGDebugInfo.
However, I could not find a way to initialize this communication.
The only interface
2015 Nov 13
2
RFC: Supporting macros in LLVM debug info
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Aboud, Amjad <amjad.aboud at intel.com> wrote:
> I found a way to skip representing macros in AST and create them directly
> in CGDebugInfo through PPCallbacks during preprocessing.
>
> To do that, I needed to extend ASTConsumer interface with this extra
> method:
>
>
>
> /// If the consumer is interested in notifications from
2015 Nov 04
2
RFC: Supporting macros in LLVM debug info
I'd like to jump in. I do not work on a preprocessor based language, but
have the same code expansion problem to encode. Right now, we hack around
the problem by appending some prefix after the file name and pretend it is
a different file, which is not great.
I understand you want to represent expansion by DIFileMacro ? I'm not how
this is supposed to be used and it is not in the example.
2015 Nov 13
2
[cfe-dev] RFC: Supporting macros in LLVM debug info
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:21 AM, David Blaikie via cfe-dev <
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Aboud, Amjad <amjad.aboud at intel.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I found a way to skip representing macros in AST and create them
2007 Jan 27
4
Xapian vs Lucene
Hello,
It's probably quite troll-risky to put a title like this, but did anyone
take the trouble to compare Lucene to Xapian and make a list of
differences?
As I told the list at the end of last year, I'm going to have to
integrate an indexing/search engine in the coming weeks or months. It
will be integrated to Dokeos, an open-source e-learning application in
PHP, and at the moment we