search for: espous

...would like to mask this rectangular grid in order to extract all and only the grid points within a specific region. Today I want to extract Montana, say, from this grid, and I am hoping to somehow use the returned value of the function map("state",region="montana"). I'm not espoused to using the "maps" library database, it's just the way I thought one could go about it (one smarter than I am...) and it would certainly be useful to exploit the many political boundaries provided by that library, when I move on from Montana to something else... Any suggestion for...

Hello Jean: Big mistake!! One of the three things that a supplier should never discuss is politics ... that's business 101. Speex may be a very good product, but we will never use it because of the politics that you espouse ... some of us out here believe strongly in the free market. And we also know that monopolies can't exist because entrepreneurs will always exploit the inevitable market openings left by another supplier ... in this case Microsoft. In fact, Speex's success is proof of the statement I j...

What is the general opinion about fixtures versus mocking and stubbing in model specs? I heard from agile on IRC that they save the database testing for integration testing, but I also see that the caboose sample applicaiton uses fixtures. I also noticed that on the rspec site, it says "Ironically (for the traditional TDD''er) these are the only specs that we feel should actually

...in any email address you sign up to the list with; it doesn't matter if you have a virus scanner integrated with your MTA, I really don't want to see 200 virus notifications a day because i posted to this list. I have been getting about 20MB of swen a day since i first posted here. Not to espouse conspiracy theories, but it really seems like this list is under attack. Can there be sme warning about this on the list signup page? Like, "Use a throwaway email address for this list", etc. I'm not complaining, just that I think some sort of warning is in order here. This swen s...

...> functionality was introduced without such a goal, but none come to my > mind) > > But I dunno, maybe other people find that to be an OK state of > affairs, I'm not a code owner/authority in much/any of this. As a user of the JIT, I am *very* strongly in favour of Lang's espoused position. p.s. I don't think we know what the "right" interface is for the JIT yet. Until we do, having multiple interfaces (with a single shared implementation, based on the rest of LLVM) seems entirely reasonable and appropriate. p.p.s. If Lang was proposing the replacement...

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Jordy Rose <jediknil at belkadan.com> wrote: > But I think I read somewhere that 0 is more C++esque. I believe Stroustrup espoused this at one point (perhaps even on his website) on the basis that using NULL gives you a false sense of security - which isn't entirely true now that compilers (GCC & clang presumably) will warn you about using NULL in non-pointer contexts. > (And C++11 nullptr's not available yet...

...that's business 101 Speex is a not business, nor is Jean-Marc selling a product. The Xiph.Org Foundation, of which Jean-Marc is a member with his Speex project, is a non-profit organization. > Speex may be a very good product, but we will never use it because of > the politics that you espouse If you would like to pay for a special US$1000 Speex license, I'm sure Jean-Marc will be glad to provide you with one. > some of us out here believe strongly in the free market. I believe "Free Market" is an American capitalist buzz word. Jean-Marc is Canadian. Regardless, I...

...tc. but devices on 5061-5080 work fine (caused by IOS interference) * or else SIP signalling works fine, but there's no media connection. I've googled various postings on the net, but they're not very consistent or even well explained. Some claim using "VIA" works, others espouse using "rport=", etc. I've looked at the Sipura administration guide, and it's troubleshooting section covers 3 scenarios (!!!): * phone won't boot up * phone won't make or receive calls * calls with poor voice quality Ok, well, that leaves a lot of territory uncovered...

Hi, does anyone have any idea how I might make a plot in R similar to this: http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/272612/BATTER-1B-PENA.png Specifically looking to plot 3 numbers in a triangle like that. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hey all, Does anyone have an example(s) of the plain text story runner for rails? I have read David''s blog (http://blog.davidchelimsky.net/articles/2007/10/22/plain-text-stories-on-rails) about it but I would like to see some examples with all of the step matchers included... I couldn''t find any more examples on google talking about the plain text stories and the example

Hi people Just wondered what your thoughts are on Microsoft's RTAudio codec that they use in their Unified Communications stuff: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=5D79B584-79C9-42A8-90C4-4AB3F03D19C4&displaylang=en They let people license it to use in their own products. I couldn't find any sample clips of RTAudio encoded speech. Apart from being $35000 less

Hi all, This is my first posting to the mailing list. We are a small but technically competent hosting company in Savannah, GA. We have recently been bitten by the rails bug ourselves and while we are enthusiastic we don''t know a great deal about rails yet. We are looking at setting up hosting for rails, but we wanted to get feedback from the community before doing so.

Hi, LLVM. I have a question I'd like to get put into the official style guidelines: do we prefer NULL or 0 for C++ objects? I've seen both throughout the code. Personally I prefer NULL, since it establishes that something is a pointer and not an integer (or integer-constructed object, but thankfully we avoid implicit conversions in LLVM/Clang). But I think I read somewhere that 0 is more

Hello Asterisk People, I am having trouble connecting asterisk to a huawei SoftX3000 Switch, i can succesfully connect other softphones like Zoiper, but when it comes to Asterisk SIP Client, the system doesn't authenticate, i have the following configuration: peer: 10.220.0.2 username: 4857768 password: 4857768 the configuration is as follows: in the general section: register =>

...x is >a not business, nor is Jean-Marc selling a >product. The Xiph.Org Foundation, of which >Jean-Marc is a member with his Speex project, is >a non-profit organization. > Speex may be a very >good product, but we will never use it because >of > the politics that you espouse If you would >like to pay for a special US$1000 Speex license, >I'm sure Jean-Marc will be glad to provide you >with one. > some of us out here believe strongly >in the free market. I believe "Free Market" is >an American capitalist buzz word. Jean-Marc is &gt...

Hello, Sometime ago min rsa key length was increased to 1024 bit and i have a little understanding problem with this. I hope somebody with some crypto-experience can enlighten me. To make that clear, that is not about allowing lower keys in general. Personally i would tend to use even longer keys(2048bit+). However Due nature of RSA-algorithm in case of 1024bit this might result in a key

I have a dual boot CentOS 5.2 / FC4 machine, and recently I have bought a new widescreen tft monitor. I used to use a plain 4:3 crt, and after plugging the 16:9 tft naturally X needed reconfiguring. This was easy in FC4, and seemed as easy in CentOS, but with a wrong result. Basically, what I did was to run system-config-display to reconfigure for the new monitor and resolution. All goes

While the spirit of BDD is to spec first and code second, many of us have legacy code. Worse, some of us have legacy code without very good coverage. Recognizing that *I* have such code, I created a script that grinds through your .rb files and creates placeholder specs for each public method. While it is more sensible to spec behavior of code function than of individual methods, this

Hi Dave, To confirm - I have no plans to remove MCJIT. I don't want to change any >> behavior for existing clients. The new stuff is opt-in. >> > > Why not? We did work to remove the legacy JIT in favor of MCJIT for the > usual reasons (less code/maintenance burden/etc) - it'd seem unfortunate to > then go back to maintaining two JITs again. > > You mention

...4.html The mechanism of this drug is public knowledge. http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=14183567&forum_id=6042 This abhorrent situation is a great example of the kind of thing that will happen if people don't get behind the values of freedom and openness that we are espousing. Please let Genentech know that you find what they are doing offensive. Publicize the mechanism so that new compounds can be obtained as replacements. For the future, continued vociferous public activism is required to prevent such outrages from occurring in the future. It becomes clear tha...