search for: bind9_flate

Hi Team, Samba Version = 4.2 Bind = 9.10 with dlz Not able to to view replication.(samba-tool drs showrepl) [root at dc2]# samba-tool drs showrepl (want to highlight the name which is using to connect) ERROR(<class 'samba.drs_utils.drsException'>): DRS connection to *dc2.ik.lan.mum* failed - drsException: DRS connection to dc2.ik.lan.mum failed: (-1073741772, 'The

On 25/03/15 16:50, VIKAS wrote: > Hi Team, > > Samba Version = 4.2 > > Bind = 9.10 with dlz > > > Not able to to view replication.(samba-tool drs showrepl) > > > [root at dc2]# samba-tool drs showrepl (want to highlight the name which is > using to connect) > > ERROR(<class 'samba.drs_utils.drsException'>): DRS connection to >

yes i realized that there is something wrong with BIND9_FLATFILE while encountering with samba_upgradedns -h which doesn't show BIND9_FLATFILE Any help on*drs repl* not working i think it is pointing to wrong FQDN how do i correct that ? > >/ Not able to to view replication.(samba-tool drs showrepl) > />/ > />/ > />/ [root at dc2

Hi Vikas, > yes i realized that there is something wrong with BIND9_FLATFILE while > encountering with samba_upgradedns -h which doesn't show BIND9_FLATFILE > > Any help on*drs repl* not working i think it is pointing to wrong FQDN > how do i correct that ? >> >/ Not able to to view replication.(samba-tool drs showrepl) >> />/ >> />/ >>

Hi folks, I think I've read every thread on this issue and don't seem to be able to resolve it. It doesn't appear to be affecting anything, however I'm not entirely sure what the implications are either way. What should I do to troubleshoot it? I have BIND9_FLAT updating a BIND server, all of the records appear correct, regular AD objects are replicated fine as well. Any help

Hai, ? i was reading: ? http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO#Testing_DNS? which stats : Don't use BIND9_FLATFILE! It's not documented and supported!? ? This is wrong imo.? ? bind9_flatefile works fine, it just does not support multi master dns, and bind9_DLZ does. so you must setup a master/slave setup for bind9 with flatfile ? If you need to run a network with dhcp-failover then this is the only option you can run if you also have multple DC's ? I've tested this and thi...

Hai, ? Is there any way to stop the updateing of named.conf.update?(bind9_dlz) ? I need to be able to add 1 line to this file. ? if its not possible then i must use bind9_flatefile, but i want to use the bind9_dlz modules since this is the only one which supports multi master dns. ? ? Best regards, ? Louis ?

Hai Mason, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: M B [mailto:mmx at exm0.net] > Verzonden: dinsdag 30 april 2019 20:42 > Aan: L.P.H. van Belle; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Replication failures > > Hi Louis, > > In the past few days I’ve removed all bind flat file configs > from my environment, and I’ve checked carefully that all DCs

Hi all, As many of us, I'm trying to find a way to have a failover solution for a Samba domain. The actual choice has been (because of hardware cost) to have only 1 physical xen-based server (ubuntu 14.04) that do (dom0) : - DHCP server (LAN) - NTP server - firewall - proxy - DNS server Then 4 VMs running for: - Samba Domain controller - Samba Domain member (file server) - Apache2 server -

Hai, I snapped this part of you logs. > Successful AuthZ: [DCE/RPC,krb5] user [COMPANY]\[DC6$] [S-1-5-21-2660373802-310620142-1895175072-6626] at [Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:16:20.224329 PDT] Remote host [ipv4:10.14.16.11:35006] local host [ipv4:10.12.16.11:49153] > [2019/04/26 10:16:23.503632, 0] ../../source4/lib/cmdline/popt_common.c:74(popt_s4_talloc_log_fn) > Bad talloc magic value

...uot;L.P.H. van Belle" <belle at bazuin.nl> > To: "samba at lists.samba.org" <samba at lists.samba.org> > Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:37:42 +0200 > Subject: Re: [Samba] sernet documentation > > One thing nobody seems to mention. > > This setup samba 4 + bind9_flate file setup works ok.. BUT > If you add a new DC, you will run in to problems.. > > bind9_flatefile setup is NOT multi master replication setup. > OK for 1 DC, but if you use more DC's, make sure you make your changes on the first dc. > setup a bind master/slave.. and for a dh...

One thing nobody seems to mention. This setup samba 4 + bind9_flate file setup works ok.. BUT If you add a new DC, you will run in to problems.. bind9_flatefile setup is NOT multi master replication setup. OK for 1 DC, but if you use more DC's, make sure you make your changes on the first dc. setup a bind master/slave.. and for a dhcp server with failover...

I've been using bind9 and DHCP on Samba 4.1.0 thru 4.1.17 and Slackware 64 14.1 for many months now in a production environment and it works just fine. There are a few tweaks here and there to get bind/dhcp to play nicely with Samba ... Note, conf file locations are Slackware, but you'll know where the same thing goes in your distro. In the examples below, my Domain IP range is

Hi, We migrated from Samba 3 to 4 (4.6.7-Ubuntu) and added promoted a Server 2008R2 as a Domain Controller. We've come across the following issues and request some suggestions to resolve them - The migration didn't generate DNS entries for the new realm. We had to manually create a new zone file (/var/cache/bind) for the new realm. Only then we were able to promote the