search for: adive

...t: p <- 6 Rmat <- diag(p) dat.cor <- rnorm(p*(p-1)/2) Rmat[outer(1:p, 1:p, "<")] <- Rmat[outer(1:p, 1:p, ">")] <- dat.cor However, the problem is that the matrix is filled by column and so the resulting matrix is not symmetric. I'd be grateful for any adive and/or solutions. Gregory --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Howdy, I'd like an adive on what to use. I have sql users, and i want to have the lastlogin of them, what is the native option for this: * Using last_login plugin which will give me the last login? * Use postlogin for imap and pop3n which will give me besides lastlogin the IP and protocol? Thanks in advanced, ---...

...t: p <- 6 Rmat <- diag(p) dat.cor <- rnorm(p*(p-1)/2) Rmat[outer(1:p, 1:p, "<")] <- Rmat[outer(1:p, 1:p, ">")] <- dat.cor However, the problem is that the matrix is filled by column and so the resulting matrix is not symmetric. I'd be grateful for any adive and/or solutions. Gregory --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...t I'm trying to update to the lastest kernel but I have a dirver that is not inculded in the distrubution, and I had to use the driver disk when installing centos 4.4 in the first place, The driver megasr .ko works fine with the installed kernel but I cannot find on for the updated kernel, any adive would be appreciated. without the updated driver there is a kernel panic on boot due to not finding the correct hard drive controller driver Thanks in advance for your help Robb

...ot.org Subject: Re: LastLogin update Hi, this seems to work very well: https://docs.iredmail.org/track.user.last.login.html You could also add "rip = $rip" in "fields" for the ip address. On 6/20/19 3:24 PM, Jorge Bastos via dovecot wrote: Howdy, I'd like an adive on what to use. I have sql users, and i want to have the lastlogin of them, what is the native option for this: * Using last_login plugin which will give me the last login? * Use postlogin for imap and pop3n which will give me besides lastlogin the IP and protocol? Thanks in advanced, --...

...en => _NXXXXXX,1,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN}@mediatrix-1204) exten => _NXXXXXX,2,Congestion [internal] include => trunks-local sip.conf snippet: [mediatrix-1204] type=peer host=172.20.16.7 mask=255.255.255.255 dtmfmode=inband context=default canreinvite=yes qualify=yes Thanks in advance for any adive you can give me. -z

Hi, this seems to work very well: https://docs.iredmail.org/track.user.last.login.html You could also add "rip = $rip" in "fields" for the ip address. On 6/20/19 3:24 PM, Jorge Bastos via dovecot wrote: > > Howdy, > > I?d like an adive on what to use. > > I have sql users, and i want to have the lastlogin of them, what is > the native option for this: > > * Using last_login plugin which will give me the last login? > * Use postlogin for imap and pop3n which will give me besides > lastlogin the IP and...

...at http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/InstallationNotes. So I addedd these configurations to the domU cfg file: irq = [ 4 ] ioports = [ "3f8-3ff" ] When I create this new domU I get this error: Error: function takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given) Is it a bug? I read on this list that you adive a change in the /usr/lib/python/xen/xend/server/irqif.py, but it didn''t fix the problem for me. Could you help me, please? Thank you very much. Bye! _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

...because there will be new schools in the future, for which i've to predict the choice probabilities. thus, the only way to describe the attributes of these future schools is by distance and profile. i have to avoid choice specific parameters (like multinomial logit). i'd appreciate any adive on packages, codes and examples. thank you very much in advance ... sven -- Sven Mueller, M.A. Dresden University of Technology Institute for Economics and Traffic Chair of Business Administration, Transport and Logistics Andreas Schubert Str. 23, 01062 Dresden Room 510 Phone: +49 351 463...

Hello Chris, Chris Lattner wrote: >This really stems from >differing goals, though LLVM can certainly be used to compile MSIL-like >systems, so it's just a matter of specifying the rules and making the >front-ends stick to them. :) > > Ok, this is clear. Do you plan any "foreign function interface" or something similar that would ease, if not automate

Chris Lattner wrote: > BTW, you might want to check out this document that Reid wrote, which > >describes his experiences writing a front-end for LLVM, and giving lots of >hints and tips: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/Stacker.html > > Thanks, I already had a quick look on it. Also thanks for your explanation on how the C++ back-end converts function calls to LLVM code. As

Hi LLVMers, For your interest, I recently came across the ccg library "dynamic code generation for C and C++". --> http://www-sor.inria.fr/projects/vvm/realizations/ccg/ccg.html It seems to share some points with LLVM. -- Sébastien

Hi Valery, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: >>To me this appears more as an algorithmic design issue, this function >>could be rewritten in "continuation passing style", and each >>continuation could be distributed by a load-balancing strategy to the >>computers sharing CPU resources. Using mechanisms such as "futures" (as >>in Mozart) allows to do

Hi all, I am an LLVM newbie, thinking about using LLVM as the platform for a toy language. In this respect, I was wondering if LLVM could be used to easily weave code written in different language. For instance, let's assume I have a library written in C, some components written in C++ and some components written in OCaml (we also assume an OCaml backend for LLVM). All this code gets

Hello Valery, I have some comments regarding your thoughts on LLVM support for distributed computing. Valery A.Khamenya wrote: >There should be an engine and layer for making dispatching optimizations in run-time. If one CPU is loaded and code is >"parallelizable" why then not to send some part of >calculation to other CPU? This kind of on-fly decision will >be one day

Hello again Valery, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > All benefits, what one could obtain from "LLVM supporting multiple CPU > at single host", one might obtaine from "LLVM supporting multiple CPU > at multiple hosts". Isn't that logical? I see more precisely what you mean, but I don't think it is that straightforward to generalise the benefits multiple CPU on