search for: accumulators

The only multiplication instruction on my target CPU is multiply-and-accumulate. The result goes into a special register that can destructively read at the end of a sequence of multiply-adds. The following sequence is required to so a simple multiply: acc r0 # clear accumulator, discarding its value (r0 reads as 0, and sinks writes) mac rSRC1, rSRC2 # multiply sources, store

...25, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk>wrote: > > On Mar 25, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Akira Hatanaka <ahatanak at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yes, it sounds like it will solve the problem. > > > > Using the following example where live ranges of accumulators $vreg_acc0 > and $vreg_acc1 conflict, > > > > MULT $vreg_acc0, $vreg_gpr0, $vreg_gpr1 > > MULT $vreg_acc1, $vreg_gpr2, $vreg_gpr3 > > > > (consumer of $vreg_acc1) > > (consumer of $vreg_acc0) > > > > if the register can create new virtual registers...

On Apr 16, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Greg McGary wrote: > The only multiplication instruction on my target CPU is > multiply-and-accumulate. The result goes into a special register that > can destructively read at the end of a sequence of multiply-adds. The > following sequence is required to so a simple multiply: > > acc r0 # clear accumulator, discarding its value (r0 reads as

On Mar 26, 2013, at 10:29 AM, Akira Hatanaka <ahatanak at gmail.com> wrote: > The size of general purpose integer registers for mips32 is 32-bit and accumulators are 64-bit registers consisting of 32-bit hi/lo register pairs. So you will need two instructions to copy two 32-bit GPR registers to a 64-bit accumulator register. If spilling to multiple registers is unsupported, perhaps I can I define a new register class consisting of paired GPR registers and p...

On Mar 25, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Akira Hatanaka <ahatanak at gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, it sounds like it will solve the problem. > > Using the following example where live ranges of accumulators $vreg_acc0 and $vreg_acc1 conflict, > > MULT $vreg_acc0, $vreg_gpr0, $vreg_gpr1 > MULT $vreg_acc1, $vreg_gpr2, $vreg_gpr3 > > (consumer of $vreg_acc1) > (consumer of $vreg_acc0) > > if the register can create new virtual registers $vreg_gpr4 and $vreg_gpr5, I think spilli...

Hi to everyone, I am starting to work with a model that is not familiar to me. The model would be like that: y = . - a*max(Q(i) - Q(0), 0) + . where Q(i) is the accumulated effect of a variable at time i and Q(0) a threshold above it there is effect on y. The value of Q(i) could be estimated as: Q(i+1) = Q(i) + b*max(s(i) - s(0), 0) + c*min(s(i) - s(0), 0) + . Where s

In the precompute_partition_info_sums_ function, instead of selecting 64-bit accumulator when the signal bps is larger than 16, revert to the original approach based on partition size, but make room for few extra bits to not overflow with unusual signals where the average residual magnitude may be larger than bps. It slightly improves the performance with standard encoding levels and 16-bit files

...uctions at the provided iterator, and > > - Create new virtual registers, possibly from different register classes. > > I think that functionality would solve your problems, right? > > Yes, it sounds like it will solve the problem. Using the following example where live ranges of accumulators $vreg_acc0 and $vreg_acc1 conflict, MULT $vreg_acc0, $vreg_gpr0, $vreg_gpr1 MULT $vreg_acc1, $vreg_gpr2, $vreg_gpr3 (consumer of $vreg_acc1) (consumer of $vreg_acc0) if the register can create new virtual registers $vreg_gpr4 and $vreg_gpr5, I think spilling can be avoided: MULT $vreg_acc0, $v...

I'm trying to define a multiply-accumulate instruction for the LEON processor, a Subtarget of the Sparc target. The documentation for the processor is as follows: === To accelerate DSP algorithms, two multiply&accumulate instructions are implemented: UMAC and SMAC. The UMAC performs an unsigned 16-bit multiply, producing a 32-bit result, and adds the result to a 40-bit accumulator made

Yes those instructions exist, although they're a bit slower than the basic 16x16->32 with 32-bit accumulation (SMLABB). So I'd be surprised if the function with 64 bit accumulation would run as fast as the current code. Don't know how much we care about 16-bit platforms. And accuracy should not matter. On the other hand, a 64-bit implementation is much cleaner/shorter, which is

Hi, I post the question again. x<-rep(c(2,3,4),20) y<-sample(rep(c(0,1),30)) tr<-rep(c(1:5),6) data1<-data.frame(x,y,tr) data1<-data1[order(data1$tr),] > data1 x y tr 2 1 1 4 0 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 4 1 1 3 1 1 2 0 1 4 0 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 4 0 1 3 1 1 3 0 2 2 0 2 >table(data1) tr = 1 y x 0 1 2 2 2 3 1 3 4 3 1 tr = 2 y x 0 1 2 2 2 3 2 2 4 1 3

Hello! I'm a PhD student working with coral reef fish diversity in Mexico. I want to do species accumulation curves but I have differential sampling effort for each "sample". Do you know or have developed an R script that consider the differential effort of each sample? PRIMER and other programs use each pack of species as a replica without the possibility of telling the program that

Hi, I am wondering how to specify the selection DAG patterns for instructions that use accumulator. For example multiply-accumulate instruction with one destination operand and two source operands: mac $dst, $src1, $src2 ;; $dst += $src1*$src2 Seems that it has a cycle in the pattern. So how do I specify it in the DAG? There are a few instructions in the ARM backend like this one, but the

I've been looking to see if there's a way to get the instruction below (SMAC) emitted from a higher-level construct, but I'm starting to think this is unrealistic. To do so, I'd have to tie-in two other instructions: Firstly, clearing the ASR18 and Y register somewhere near the start of the method, then copying out the value of these registers somewhere near the end of the method,

On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 01:21:03PM +0400, lvqcl wrote: > Miroslav Lichvar ?????: > > > +/* > > + * This is used to avoid overflow with unusual signals in 32-bit > > + * accumulator in the *precompute_partition_info_sums_* functions. > > + */ > > +#define FLAC__MAX_EXTRA_RESIDUAL_BPS 4 > > > + /* WATCHOUT: "+ bps +

Hi All, Asterisk 1.4.12 CentOS 5 My ISP account includes nearly 500 minutes of VOIP calls per month but the service is expensive for unbundled minutes. So I'm trying to find a way to keep an accumulated total of calls made through that trunk so that I can automatically switch to a lower-cost provider when my bundled minutes are used. The plan is to store the accumulated time in AstDB and

Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 07:45:53PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > The fix was changing one local variable from FLAC_uint32 to FLAC_uint64 > > in function precompute_partition_info_sums_(). > > > > https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=6f7ec60c7e7f05f5ab0b1cf6b7b0945e44afcd4b > > I don't like this fix. It will

Oops. I proofread my email a little too late. I corrected the example. Hopefully what I am suggesting is clear. Brian Willoughby Sound Consulting On Jun 22, 2010, at 22:15, Brian Willoughby wrote: > What you need to do is write a bitStream function. It should only > read each byte from the stream once and completely deal with all 8 > bits before reading the next byte. You

Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > In the precompute_partition_info_sums_ function, instead of selecting > 64-bit accumulator when the signal bps is larger than 16, revert to the > original approach based on partition size, but make room for few extra > bits to not overflow with unusual signals where the average residual > magnitude may be larger than bps. > > It slightly improves

...day, March 26, 2013 12:40:44 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [PATCH] RegScavenger::scavengeRegister > > > On Mar 26, 2013, at 10:29 AM, Akira Hatanaka <ahatanak at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > The size of general purpose integer registers for mips32 is 32-bit > > and accumulators are 64-bit registers consisting of 32-bit hi/lo > > register pairs. So you will need two instructions to copy two > > 32-bit GPR registers to a 64-bit accumulator register. If spilling > > to multiple registers is unsupported, perhaps I can I define a new > > register class...