search for: 86m

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "86m".

Did you mean: 86
2010 Oct 20
0
Increased memory usage between 4.8 and 5.5
...d 31734 nobody 15 0 340m 91m 41m S 0.0 2.3 1:13.52 httpd 8904 nobody 15 0 341m 89m 39m S 0.0 2.3 0:35.28 httpd 7353 nobody 15 0 336m 87m 42m S 0.0 2.2 1:21.17 httpd 26097 nobody 15 0 333m 87m 43m S 0.0 2.2 1:28.84 httpd 20765 nobody 15 0 335m 86m 42m S 0.0 2.2 0:48.50 httpd 23299 nobody 15 0 334m 86m 42m S 0.0 2.2 1:13.35 httpd --- centos 4.8 --- $ uname -a Linux ws89 2.6.9-89.0.28.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Aug 20 16:11:39 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND...
2018 Apr 27
3
Size of produced binaries when compiling llvm & clang sources
...g-offload-bundler 122M llvm-mca 121M verify-uselistorder 121M llvm-cat 120M llvm-as 117M llvm-special-case-list-fuzzer 117M llvm-demangle-fuzzer 116M llvm-modextract 114M obj2yaml 112M llvm-xray 105M sanstats 105M llvm-symbolizer 96M llvm-readobj 93M llvm-cov 90M lli-child-target 86M llvm-cxxdump 85M llvm-objcopy 83M llvm-cvtres 82M llvm-size 76M clang-apply-replacements 75M clang-format 64M llvm-diff 59M llvm-dis 53M llvm-stress 50M llvm-tblgen 48M llvm-profdata 31M yaml2obj 17M clang-tblgen - regards, Manuel -------------- next part -------------- A...
2018 Apr 27
0
Size of produced binaries when compiling llvm & clang sources
...121M llvm-cat > 120M llvm-as > 117M llvm-special-case-list-fuzzer > 117M llvm-demangle-fuzzer > 116M llvm-modextract > 114M obj2yaml > 112M llvm-xray > 105M sanstats > 105M llvm-symbolizer > 96M llvm-readobj > 93M llvm-cov > 90M lli-child-target > 86M llvm-cxxdump > 85M llvm-objcopy > 83M llvm-cvtres > 82M llvm-size > 76M clang-apply-replacements > 75M clang-format > 64M llvm-diff > 59M llvm-dis > 53M llvm-stress > 50M llvm-tblgen > 48M llvm-profdata > 31M yaml2obj > 17M clang-tblgen &g...
2003 Aug 20
0
my file transfers are incredibly slow
...ome info from top as I was transfering a large file: last pid: 39875; load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 up 10+10:22:57 01:38:14 22 processes: 2 running, 20 sleeping CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.4% system, 1.2% interrupt, 98.4% idle Mem: 17M Active, 546M Inact, 150M Wired, 36M Cache, 86M Buf, 1328K Free Swap: 384M Total, 384M Free $ ping 172.16.16.1 PING 172.16.16.1 (172.16.16.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 172.16.16.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.760 ms 64 bytes from 172.16.16.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.047 ms 64 bytes from 172.16.16.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.070 ms 64 bytes f...
2006 Oct 03
1
Samba 3.0.23c memory usage increased ten fold to over 70Mb / smbd process
...00:10 0.1% smbd/1 13551 root 77M 73M sleep 59 0 0:00:18 0.1% smbd/1 19888 root 77M 73M sleep 59 0 0:00:10 0.1% smbd/1 29251 root 77M 73M sleep 59 0 0:00:13 0.1% smbd/1 20490 root 78M 73M sleep 59 0 0:00:19 0.1% smbd/1 1311 root 86M 81M sleep 59 0 0:05:58 0.1% smbd/1 7095 root 77M 70M sleep 59 0 0:00:00 0.0% smbd/1 1969 root 77M 73M sleep 59 0 0:00:02 0.0% smbd/1 10797 root 84M 79M sleep 59 0 0:06:06 0.0% smbd/1 7638 root 74M 49M sleep 59 0 0:00:00 0.0...
2007 Apr 01
8
zfs destroy <snapshot> takes hours
Hello, I am having a problem destroying zfs snapshots. The machine is almost not responding for more than 4 hours, after I started the command and I can''t run anything else during that time - I get (bash): fork: Resource temporarily unavailable - errors. The machine is still responding somewhat, but very, very slow. It is: P4, 2.4 GHz with 512 MB RAM, 8 x 750 GB disks as raidZ,
2005 Apr 02
4
mkbootdisk!
...ror: No space left on device cat: write error: No space left on device 20+0 records in 20+0 records out I have enogh space on the disk: [root at server:~]$ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/md5 17G 1.8G 14G 12% / /dev/md1 99M 8.4M 86M 9% /boot none 126M 0 126M 0% /dev/shm /dev/md3 9.7G 2.7G 6.5G 30% /home /dev/md0 981M 26M 905M 3% /usr/local/salva /dev/md4 4.9G 262M 4.4G 6% /var/log /dev/md2 981M 24M 908M 3% /var/spool regards, Isra...
2015 Jun 24
6
LVM hatred, was Re: /boot on a separate partition?
On 06/23/2015 08:10 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > Ok, you made me curious. Just how dramatic can it be? From where I'm > sitting, a read/write to a disk takes the amount of time it takes, the > hardware has a certain physical speed, regardless of the presence of > LVM. What am I missing? Well, there's best and worst case scenarios. Best case for file-backed VMs is
2005 Jan 11
2
dnat problem
...0 DNAT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 193.205.140.6 tcp dpt:443 to:10.2.15.23 0 0 DNAT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 193.205.140.6 multiport dports 3389,4330 to:10.2.15.25 Mangle Table Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 221K packets, 86M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 837 164K pretos all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 173K packets, 67M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source...
2019 Apr 30
6
Disk space and RAM requirements in docs
...VMLanaiCodeGen.dir 93M build/lib/Target/Lanai/CMakeFiles 93M build/lib/MC 91M build/lib/Target/XCore/CMakeFiles/LLVMXCoreCodeGen.dir 91M build/lib/Target/XCore/CMakeFiles 89M build/tools/llvm-exegesis 87M build/lib/Target/BPF/CMakeFiles/LLVMBPFCodeGen.dir 87M build/lib/Target/BPF/CMakeFiles 86M build/tools/clang/lib/Index/CMakeFiles/clangIndex.dir 86M build/tools/clang/lib/Index/CMakeFiles 86M build/tools/clang/lib/Index 85M build/lib/Target/MSP430 84M build/lib/Target/Sparc/CMakeFiles/LLVMSparcCodeGen.dir 84M build/lib/Target/Sparc/CMakeFiles 81M build/tools/llvm-exegesis/lib 81M...