Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "60659b73".
Did you mean:
606593
2016 Dec 29
0
RFC: Inline expansion of memcmp vs call to standard library
Improving lowering for memcmp is definitely something we should do for
all targets. Doing it in a target specific way is decidedly non-ideal.
It looks like we already have some code in SelectionDAGBuilder which
tries to optimize the lowering for the memcpy library call. I am a bit
confused by the problem you are trying to solve. Are you specifically
interested in lowering for constant
2016 Dec 30
2
RFC: Inline expansion of memcmp vs call to standard library
...________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161229/60659b73/attachment.html>