search for: 115mb

...2.9G 35M 2.9G 2% /dev/shm Parted info: (parted) select /dev/sdb Using /dev/sdb (parted) print Model: ATA ST3500630AS (scsi) Disk /dev/sdb: 500GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: msdos Number Start End Size Type File system Flags 1 32.3kB 115MB 115MB primary ext3 boot 2 115MB 32.3GB 32.2GB primary ext3 3 32.3GB 35.5GB 3224MB primary linux-swap 4 35.5GB 500GB 465GB extended 5 35.5GB 78.5GB 43.0GB logical ext3 6 78.5GB 111GB 32.2GB logical ext3 7 111GB 132G...

As counter example. My slowest server, AMD E350 2 core, max 1.6Gz. On 1Gb lan, disk 2x 5400rpm software raid 1 + 1 ssd. Copy Speed 115Mb/s as in max 1Gb bandwith, from a win7 and win10 pc to the raid1. File sizes. 100Mb+ get max 115Mb/s to a 4MB blocksized partition. 1-10mb files ,max 90-115Mb/s to a 1MB blocksized partition. 0.0-1mb files ,max 60-100Mb/s to a 4k blocksized partition. I get these speeds while im watching my...

...hen see if you wifi is still faster then you ethernet. If you model is a 1xx, what happens when you disable https? DSM version is? > But as I said I have 60MB/s speeds over the wire to some Linux OS. Thats for wire also slow in my opinion, if have a "good" setup, you can get the 100-115MB/s over gigabit lines. > Well thank you for your interest regardless; Your welkom... > I cannot understand why the wifi link to the internet is at > least 4-5-6MB/s constantly, and that same wifi link to the local server > runs about 3.5MB/s max and that is only in the beginning an...

Am 25.04.2018 um 09:56 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > As counter example. > My slowest server, AMD E350 2 core, max 1.6Gz. > On 1Gb lan, disk 2x 5400rpm software raid 1 + 1 ssd. > > Copy Speed 115Mb/s as in max 1Gb bandwith, from a win7 and win10 pc to the raid1. > > File sizes. > 100Mb+ get max 115Mb/s to a 4MB blocksized partition. > 1-10mb files ,max 90-115Mb/s to a 1MB blocksized partition. > 0.0-1mb files ,max 60-100Mb/s to a 4k blocksized partition. > > I get th...

...----- | ----- -------- | My goal is to increase the bandwidth for a single tcp session between the two hosts for a backup job (per packet round robin?), not for multiple connections between many hosts. I know that I won''t get 2 x 115Mb/s because of packet reordering, but 20-30% more that a single connection would be ok. I followed different HowTOs http://www.lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html#AEN298 http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.loadshare.html or something like: ip route...equalize via... but I never got a higher t...

If I run the following command: # /usr/local/bin/rsync -a --stats -v --delete --force --recursive /source /dest building file list ... done source/file1 source/file2 source/file3 source/file4 source/file5 source/ Number of files: 74 Number of files transferred: 5 Total file size: 1104726340 bytes Total transferred file size: 115163136 bytes Literal data: 463500 bytes Matched data: 114699636

Hello, I'm trying to squeeze out maximum possible transfer between two Samba 3.3.1 servers. Both servers and switch supports jumbo frames, network link and disks does not appear to be bottleneck, between these two servers FTP transfer rates are about 115MB/s (1gbit link is saturated at this point) - and I'd like to see similar transfer from Samba (now I get half of it). 10.0.0.5 # wget ftp://10.0.0.2/1G 100%[=================================================================================================================>] 1,048,576,000 118M/...

> Limiting the linux-server's max cpu-speed had > the most affect on performance: > (limited to 1.6GHz instead of 2.4GHz) (33% limitation) The server is equipped with an 6 core / 12 tread 3.6 GHz CPU (Intel Core i7-980x   and  a Raid 10 Disk array. The cpu is 90% idle (including webserver traffic and mailserver traffic) during downloads. There is no encryption because the samba VM

...node, replica 3 cluster - Private dedicated Network: 1Gx3, bond: balance-alb - was able to down the volume for the upgrade and reboot each node - Usage: VM Hosting (qemu) - Sharded Volume - sequential read performance in VM's has dropped from 700Mbps to 300mbs - Seq Write has dropped from 115MB/s (approx) to 110 - Write IOPS have dropped from 12MB/s to 8MB/s Apart from increasing the op version I made no changes to the volume settings. op.version is 31004 gluster v info Volume Name: datastore4 Type: Replicate Volume ID: 0ba131ef-311d-4bb1-be46-596e83b2f6ce Status: Started Snapshot C...

Hi, I'm running samba server on board and client is windows 7. I did below steps for performance tests. + format /dev/sda1 with ext4 + mount the drive in server as mentioned in [media] path of /etc/samba/smb.conf + created a root password $ smbpasswd -a root + 1Gb ethernet interface from board. + map the driver in windows + did a 4gb robocopy + read got 13MBps and write got 105MBps

...ls 139137 1.1 786432 6.0 444750 3.4 This is my baseline. linux 'top' reports 48MB as baseline. This includes some of my own routines that are always loaded. Good.. Next, I created a s.csv file with 22 variables and 500,000 observations, taking up an uncompressed disk space of 115MB. The resulting object.size() after a read.csv() is 84,002,712 bytes (80MB). > s= read.csv("s.csv"); > object.size(s); [1] 84002712 here is where things get more interesting. after the read.csv() is finished, gc() reports used (Mb) gc trigger (Mb) max used (Mb) Nc...

just to verify basic facts: Did you cross check vie network sniff, on which SMB protocol versions Server + Win 7 clients agree ? Or did you pin down via registry ? AFAIK only starting with win 8 or win 10 clients you could ask with powershell, which protocol version is in use. Did you also cross check samba logs for a name resolution issue ( windows names, not DNS) if one of your boxes is an

I was transferring a file from a (slow) smbd server running on some NAS. The transfer speed is only 1MB/s but the NAS uses 100% CPU. Normally the NAS can handle 60MB/s download (from the NAS). Could it be that the connection uses encryption or something? What could be causing this slow speed? I have internet download speeds over this same connection surpassing 5MB/s. I cannot imagine why

...rnsmooth r-cran-lattice r-cran-mass r-cran-matrix r-cran-mgcv r-cran-nlme r-cran-nnet r-cran-rpart r-cran-spatial r-cran-survival r-doc-html r-recommended xz-utils zlib1g-dev 0 upgraded, 44 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/47.1MB of archives. After this operation, 115MB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Media change: please insert the disc labeled 'Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS _Lucid Lynx_ - Release amd64 (20100816.1)' in the drive '/cdrom/' and press enter at which point the shell hangs after entering. I installed Ubun...

...444750 3.4 > > This is my baseline. linux 'top' reports 48MB as baseline. This > includes some of my own routines that are always loaded. Good.. > > > Next, I created a s.csv file with 22 variables and 500,000 > observations, taking up an uncompressed disk space of 115MB. The > resulting object.size() after a read.csv() is 84,002,712 bytes (80MB). > >> s= read.csv("s.csv"); >> object.size(s); > > [1] 84002712 > > > here is where things get more interesting. after the read.csv() is > finished, gc() reports > >...

Hello I have Debian Linux 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 Xen 4.0.1, 2 SAS drives in RAID 1, 16GB ram. I have virtualized Windows 2003R2 32bit where you install the latest version 0.11.0.295 gplpv After reading and reading forums and post testing, I noticed that the hard disk performance drops significantly when I assign the windows domU 9GB ram. (below I leave the config files) If I run the

hi all, after i upgraded a physical server (SUN FIRE X4170) from CentOS 6.8 to 7.2 i am not able to get the same iSCSI read performance. the server is connected to HP P2000 Storage via 2 x 1GbE Ethernet. CentOS 6.8 gives me full read performance on raw iSCSI devices /dev/sdxx at 115MB/s. CentOS 7.2 allows only 90-100MB/s, read performance varies and is not stable like for 6.8 the multipath performance on 7.2 is even worse. CentOS 6.8 allows to read a full speed and stable 220MB/s. CentOS 7.2 maximum was 140MB/s after i disabled readahead for multipath devices in tuned. btw. i...

...ve an Linux box that is cyrix 200 with ide drives and 100 mbit net card I can send files to them about the same. Samba is the slowest when it comes to getting files off of them. The Results ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I have a directory of 115MB of files. Win95 takes me 92 sec to send and 50 sec to rec NT Server takes me 68 to send and 52 sec to rec NT Workstation takes me 55 sec to send and 38 sec to rec Sambe takes me 70 sec to send but it takes 125 sec to rec. I am sitting on a NT Workstation dual pentiumII300 with SCSI drives and 100...

...Network: 1Gx3, bond: balance-alb > > - was able to down the volume for the upgrade and reboot each node > > - Usage: VM Hosting (qemu) > > - Sharded Volume > > - sequential read performance in VM's has dropped from 700Mbps to 300mbs > > - Seq Write has dropped from 115MB/s (approx) to 110 > > - Write IOPS have dropped from 12MB/s to 8MB/s > > Apart from increasing the op version I made no changes to the volume > settings. > > op.version is 31004 > > gluster v info > > Volume Name: datastore4 > Type: Replicate > Volume ID: 0ba1...

...? Cheers 2017-07-02 10:10 GMT+02:00 Dominik Psenner <dpsenner@gmail.com>: > Hi > > a small update on this. I just migrated the vm from the site to my laptop > and fired it up. The exact same xml configuration (except file paths and > such) starts up and bursts with 50Mb/s to 115Mb/s in the guest. This allows > only one reasonable answer: the cpu on my laptop is somehow better suited > to emulate IO than the CPU built into the host on site. The host there is a > HP proliant microserver gen8 with xeon processor. But the processor there > is also never capped at 100...