vincent at cojot.name
2020-Jul-03 18:58 UTC
[Samba] Samba 4.11.11, 4.10.17 and 4.12.5 for rhel7/centos7 rpms
Hi everyone, I've posted some rpm builds of samba 4.11.11, 4.10.17 and 4.12.5 for RHEL/Centos 7.x (currently 7.7). These rpms use the python3 and python3-devel rpms introduced in the standard RHEL/Centos repos at the same time as the 7.7 version. Comments and/or testing feedback would be most welcomed. http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.12.5 http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.11.11 http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.10.17 Credits: - Nico Kadel-Garcia for the compat-* rpms - Guenther Deschner & others for maintaining the fedora rpms Please don't hesitate to provide feedback (good or bad). Kind Regards, Vincent
Nico Kadel-Garcia
2020-Jul-04 01:14 UTC
[Samba] Samba 4.11.11, 4.10.17 and 4.12.5 for rhel7/centos7 rpms
On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 3:00 PM Vincent S. Cojot via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:> > > Hi everyone, > > I've posted some rpm builds of samba 4.11.11, 4.10.17 and 4.12.5 for > RHEL/Centos 7.x (currently 7.7).My build repo is also updated to 4.12.5 at https://github.com/nkadel/samba4repo/ . This also includes build tools for CentOS 8 and Fedora 32, and hooks to use the "--with-experimental-ad-dc" option. I'm not sure if that's stable enough for production work yes, but Fedora 32 is using it by default. I'll note that I didn't *write* the compatibility RPM tools, I got them from Sergio Basio. But I'm glad they're helping.
Rowland penny
2020-Jul-04 07:35 UTC
[Samba] Samba 4.11.11, 4.10.17 and 4.12.5 for rhel7/centos7 rpms
On 04/07/2020 02:14, Nico Kadel-Garcia via samba wrote:> On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 3:00 PM Vincent S. Cojot via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> I've posted some rpm builds of samba 4.11.11, 4.10.17 and 4.12.5 for >> RHEL/Centos 7.x (currently 7.7). > My build repo is also updated to 4.12.5 at > https://github.com/nkadel/samba4repo/ . This also includes build tools > for CentOS 8 and Fedora 32, and hooks to use the > "--with-experimental-ad-dc" option. I'm not sure if that's stable > enough for production work yes, but Fedora 32 is using it by default. > > I'll note that I didn't *write* the compatibility RPM tools, I got > them from Sergio Basio. But I'm glad they're helping. >Using 'MIT' as the kdc is still regarded as experimental, so shouldn't be used in production. Rowland