Hi all, CTDB seems to be needing an underlaying GlusterFS. Would it be possible to declare a second GlusterFS share to host Sysvol data? I have no experience about distributed file systems, so I'm not sure this GlusterFS file system would act as a normal FS (modulo locking process) from Samba point of view when it access to that FS. Then Samba would share this through CIFS these data... Anyone having already tried that? Best regards, mathias
Hello Mathias, Am 30.06.2015 um 19:30 schrieb mathias dufresne:> CTDB seems to be needing an underlaying GlusterFS. Would it be possible to > declare a second GlusterFS share to host Sysvol data?No. See https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Replication#FAQ Regards, Marc
On 30/06/15 18:30, mathias dufresne wrote:> Hi all, > > CTDB seems to be needing an underlaying GlusterFS. Would it be possible to > declare a second GlusterFS share to host Sysvol data? > > I have no experience about distributed file systems, so I'm not sure this > GlusterFS file system would act as a normal FS (modulo locking process) > from Samba point of view when it access to that FS. Then Samba would share > this through CIFS these data... > > Anyone having already tried that? > > Best regards, > > mathiasYes and no it will not work, see at the bottom of the page here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Bidirectional_Replication Rowland
This should be possible with the script folder beneath that path. Working for me by linking the scripts folder to my replicating gluster vol. The policies should be done with a cron job/script. Greetings Daniel EDV Daniel M?ller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus Paul-Lechler-Str. 24 72076 T?bingen Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499 eMail: mueller at tropenklinik.de Internet: www.tropenklinik.de -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Im Auftrag von mathias dufresne Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Juni 2015 19:30 An: samba at lists.samba.org Betreff: [SPAMVERDACHT] [Samba] Sysvol on GlusterFS? Hi all, CTDB seems to be needing an underlaying GlusterFS. Would it be possible to declare a second GlusterFS share to host Sysvol data? I have no experience about distributed file systems, so I'm not sure this GlusterFS file system would act as a normal FS (modulo locking process) from Samba point of view when it access to that FS. Then Samba would share this through CIFS these data... Anyone having already tried that? Best regards, mathias -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba