On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:06 -0700, Juan Pablo Lorier
wrote:> Hi people,
>
> I'm trying to move from windows PDC to samba, and I'm waiting a bit
> until samba 4 gets a little more mature. What I also want to use is
> FreeIPA as I need an LDAP+Kerberos environment not only for samba but
> also for the rest of the services.
> Here is where I quite don't know really what is in samba's
developers
> mind, so I don't know if I can use samba's ldap for multipurpose or
> need to build an ldap for the other services and then get samba to use
> it.
If the other services you want to use will talk to an AD-like schema,
there is no reason why you can't use Samba4 for that.
> Any one to spread some light on this?
> Regards,
For information on FreeIPA, you are best to ask them. I continue to
work with them to ensure that Fedora DS/'389' can work as a Samba4
backend, but beyond that I don't know their status (and it's not very
clear on their wiki).
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20100511/6b3b5819/attachment.pgp>