The changes made to 2.6.0pre1 have been pretty minor so far, so I had been debating whether we needed a pre2 release or not. I finally decided to go ahead and release what little there is, just to give folks a final opportunity to double check the final release: http://samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.0pre2.tar.gz http://samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.0pre2.tar.gz.sig http://samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/patches/rsync-2.6.0pre1-2.6.0pre2.diffs.gz http://samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/patches/rsync-2.6.0pre1-2.6.0pre2.diffs.gz.sig My current plan is to release 2.6.0 final on January 1st, barring any unforeseen complications. Let me know if you run into any problems, or have comments, questions, or concerns. Thanks, ..wayne.. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/attachments/20031228/6e5de4b9/attachment.bin
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 01:32:53PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:> The changes made to 2.6.0pre1 have been pretty minor so far, so I had > been debating whether we needed a pre2 release or not. I finally > decided to go ahead and release what little there is, just to give > folks a final opportunity to double check the final release: > > http://samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.0pre2.tar.gz > http://samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.0pre2.tar.gz.sig > > http://samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/patches/rsync-2.6.0pre1-2.6.0pre2.diffs.gz > http://samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/patches/rsync-2.6.0pre1-2.6.0pre2.diffs.gz.sig > > My current plan is to release 2.6.0 final on January 1st, barring any > unforeseen complications. Let me know if you run into any problems, or > have comments, questions, or concerns. Thanks, > > ..wayne..Sounds good to me. Should this be sent to rsync-announce? I just updated my network here to HEAD for what it is worth. btw, thanks for your work on this. Much appreciated. -- ________________________________________________________________ J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies email address: jw@pegasys.ws Remember Cernan and Schmitt
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 01:48:40PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:> Sounds good to me. Should this be sent to rsync-announce?I had been assuming that just the announcement of the final 2.6.0 release would go to rsync-announce, but apparently there is a precedence for announcing pre-releases there as well. ..wayne..
I just noticed this in the rsyncd.conf manpage: .SH "VERSION" This man page is current for version 2\&.0 of rsync I'm sure that this can be updated to 2.6.0 :-) Paul Slootman
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 01:32:53PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:> The changes made to 2.6.0pre1 have been pretty minor so far, so I had > been debating whether we needed a pre2 release or not. I finally > decided to go ahead and release what little there is, just to give > folks a final opportunity to double check the final release: > > http://samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.0pre2.tar.gz > http://samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.0pre2.tar.gz.sig > > http://samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/patches/rsync-2.6.0pre1-2.6.0pre2.diffs.gz > http://samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/patches/rsync-2.6.0pre1-2.6.0pre2.diffs.gz.sig > > My current plan is to release 2.6.0 final on January 1st, barring any > unforeseen complications. Let me know if you run into any problems, or > have comments, questions, or concerns. Thanks,Is there any chance of including EXEEXT=@EXEEXT@ in Makefile.in? This would enable it to build more easily on OS/2 without jumping through numerous hoops.> > ..wayne..-- John
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 02:04:47AM +0000, John Poltorak wrote:> Is there any chance of including EXEEXT=@EXEEXT@ in Makefile.in?I committed that change last January, so it should already be in the 2.5.6 and 2.5.7 releases. ..wayne..