Hello, I have the RedCloth 4.x gem installed on a new machine. I used to use the redcloth command line tool/executable ocassionally. Can anyone clarify if it''s still part of the RedCloth 4.x gem series? Thanks. PS: I checked the sources. And the executable source resides in bin [1]. However, checking the Rakefile that generates the gem package I can''t find any spec.executables = [ ''redcloth'' ] entry or similar [2]. [1] http://github.com/jgarber/redcloth/tree/master/bin/redcloth [2] http://github.com/jgarber/redcloth/tree/master/Rakefile -- Gerald Bauer - Internet Professional - http://geraldbauer.ca
It should still be there. The Rakefile requires echoe, which takes care of specifying the executables. ~/Documents/redcloth(master) $ gem specification pkg/ RedCloth-4.1.0.gem | grep -A1 executables executables: - redcloth On Nov 6, 2008, at 2:38 PM, Gerald Bauer wrote:> Hello, > > I have the RedCloth 4.x gem installed on a new machine. I used to > use the redcloth command line tool/executable ocassionally. Can anyone > clarify if it''s still part of the RedCloth 4.x gem series? Thanks. > > PS: I checked the sources. And the executable source resides in bin > [1]. However, checking the Rakefile that generates the gem package I > can''t find any spec.executables = [ ''redcloth'' ] entry or similar [2]. > > [1] http://github.com/jgarber/redcloth/tree/master/bin/redcloth > [2] http://github.com/jgarber/redcloth/tree/master/Rakefile > > -- > Gerald Bauer - Internet Professional - http://geraldbauer.ca > _______________________________________________ > Redcloth-upwards mailing list > Redcloth-upwards at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/redcloth-upwards
Hello,> It should still be there. The Rakefile requires echoe, which takes care of > specifying the executables. > > ~/Documents/redcloth(master) $ gem specification pkg/RedCloth-4.1.0.gem | > grep -A1 executables > executables: > - redclothThanks for clarifying and thanks for the gem spec tip to check up on the spec used for the installation. I installed the latest version, that is, 4.1.0 and the executable is now included again. It was missing in 4.0.3 (e.g. the spec says: executables: [] ). Thanks again for the clarification. Cheers. -- Gerald Bauer - Internet Professional - http://geraldbauer.ca