Hi I have an app that is in rails 2.3.10 on my server, the author does not develop it anymore but changes are forbidden due too licensing. On the other Hand I am a rails 3 app that should run under the same server. They should have different subdomains, resulting in oldapp.example.com and newapp.example.com. But how can I achieve this behavior? First try was to install rails 2x and 3x side by side but that is resulting in various errormessages flooding my logs in both applications. Given is Apache 2.2 with an 3 month old passanger, ruby 1.8.x, rails versions as stated above. Is there a way to have the applications work in paralel or have I to backport my own app to rails 2? I have root access to the server it self, but as already said the application is not under active developement any more and I cant modify it because of the licensing. Porting it would take way to much time too. Thanks in advance Norbert -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
On Mar 16, 6:05 am, Norbert Melzer <timmel...-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Hi > > I have an app that is in rails 2.3.10 on my server, the author does not > develop it anymore but changes are forbidden due too licensing. On the other > Hand I am a rails 3 app that should run under the same server. > > They should have different subdomains, resulting in oldapp.example.com and > newapp.example.com. But how can I achieve this behavior? > > First try was to install rails 2x and 3x side by side but that is resulting > in various errormessages flooding my logs in both applications. > > Given is Apache 2.2 with an 3 month old passanger, ruby 1.8.x, rails > versions as stated above. > > Is there a way to have the applications work in paralel or have I to > backport my own app to rails 2? > > I have root access to the server it self, but as already said the > application is not under active developement any more and I cant modify it > because of the licensing. Porting it would take way to much time too. >Multiple rails versions is fine. If you''re not already using bundler then you should as it solve some of the slightly sticky dependency issues you can run into. Fred> Thanks in advance > Norbert-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Norbert, You can install multiple Ruby stacks on the same machine using RVM. (Ruby Version Manager) However, to run more than one version of Passenger, you''ll have to fire up another instance of your web server and use a proxy pass. Excerpt from http://rvm.beginrescueend.com/integration/passenger/: Q: Can I run multiple projects under passenger with each project on a different ruby version? A: Not at this time. Passenger currently only supports running it''s projects under *one* ruby. You can get this behavior using a proxy pass. I''m not sure, however, what the repercussions of running Passenger under one version of Ruby and a project under another. With an RVM based installation, Passenger is running in an isolated stack with it''s own gems, etc. The apache config points to that stack. Unless someone chimes in and shoots it down, I would think it''s worth a try. Have you looked into RVM? http://rvm.beginrescueend.com/rvm/basics/ Have you looked into hosting your new site somewhere else? Heroku is free for smaller sites. If you have a large data requirement you can use Amazon S3 for about 0.15 / GB / month. HTH, Dan On Mar 16, 2:05 am, Norbert Melzer <timmel...-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Hi > > I have an app that is in rails 2.3.10 on my server, the author does not > develop it anymore but changes are forbidden due too licensing. On the other > Hand I am a rails 3 app that should run under the same server. > > They should have different subdomains, resulting in oldapp.example.com and > newapp.example.com. But how can I achieve this behavior? > > First try was to install rails 2x and 3x side by side but that is resulting > in various errormessages flooding my logs in both applications. > > Given is Apache 2.2 with an 3 month old passanger, ruby 1.8.x, rails > versions as stated above. > > Is there a way to have the applications work in paralel or have I to > backport my own app to rails 2? > > I have root access to the server it self, but as already said the > application is not under active developement any more and I cant modify it > because of the licensing. Porting it would take way to much time too. > > Thanks in advance > Norbert-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
I use RVM in development and it is a great tool, but I am curious.. If passenger can only run "one" ruby what is the advantage of installing RVM in the server? Can you create gemsets? On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:13 AM, dsadaka <dan-faHGhEMRMREnEVtka5Vzhw@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Norbert, > > You can install multiple Ruby stacks on the same machine using RVM. > (Ruby Version Manager) However, to run more than one version of > Passenger, you''ll have to fire up another instance of your web server > and use a proxy pass. Excerpt from > http://rvm.beginrescueend.com/integration/passenger/: > > Q: Can I run multiple projects under passenger with each project on a > different ruby version? > > A: Not at this time. Passenger currently only supports running it''s > projects under *one* ruby. You can get this behavior using a proxy > pass. > > I''m not sure, however, what the repercussions of running Passenger > under one version of Ruby and a project under another. With an RVM > based installation, Passenger is running in an isolated stack with > it''s own gems, etc. The apache config points to that stack. Unless > someone chimes in and shoots it down, I would think it''s worth a try. > > Have you looked into RVM? http://rvm.beginrescueend.com/rvm/basics/ > Have you looked into hosting your new site somewhere else? Heroku is > free for smaller sites. If you have a large data requirement you can > use Amazon S3 for about 0.15 / GB / month. > > HTH, > Dan > > On Mar 16, 2:05 am, Norbert Melzer <timmel...-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > Hi > > > > I have an app that is in rails 2.3.10 on my server, the author does not > > develop it anymore but changes are forbidden due too licensing. On the > other > > Hand I am a rails 3 app that should run under the same server. > > > > They should have different subdomains, resulting in oldapp.example.comand > > newapp.example.com. But how can I achieve this behavior? > > > > First try was to install rails 2x and 3x side by side but that is > resulting > > in various errormessages flooding my logs in both applications. > > > > Given is Apache 2.2 with an 3 month old passanger, ruby 1.8.x, rails > > versions as stated above. > > > > Is there a way to have the applications work in paralel or have I to > > backport my own app to rails 2? > > > > I have root access to the server it self, but as already said the > > application is not under active developement any more and I cant modify > it > > because of the licensing. Porting it would take way to much time too. > > > > Thanks in advance > > Norbert > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > >-- Jazmin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
On Mar 16, 1:28 pm, Jazmin <jazminschroe...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> I use RVM in development and it is a great tool, but I am curious.. If > passenger can only run "one" ruby what is the advantage of installing RVM in > the server? Can you create gemsets? > >Passenger only wants one ruby interpreter - multiple gemsets are, I believe, fine (although bundler solves that problem very well too). RVM does make it really easy to handle ruby version upgrades and that sort of stuff or if you want a specific version of ruby that isn''t the default one for the distro you use. You can have multiple ruby versions with passenger, but you need (effectively) several different passengers running, each with its ruby version (via the passenger standalone stuff that is mentioned in the page Dan links to) Fred> > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:13 AM, dsadaka <d...-faHGhEMRMREnEVtka5Vzhw@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > Norbert, > > > You can install multiple Ruby stacks on the same machine using RVM. > > (Ruby Version Manager) However, to run more than one version of > > Passenger, you''ll have to fire up another instance of your web server > > and use a proxy pass. Excerpt from > >http://rvm.beginrescueend.com/integration/passenger/: > > > Q: Can I run multiple projects under passenger with each project on a > > different ruby version? > > > A: Not at this time. Passenger currently only supports running it''s > > projects under *one* ruby. You can get this behavior using a proxy > > pass. > > > I''m not sure, however, what the repercussions of running Passenger > > under one version of Ruby and a project under another. With an RVM > > based installation, Passenger is running in an isolated stack with > > it''s own gems, etc. The apache config points to that stack. Unless > > someone chimes in and shoots it down, I would think it''s worth a try. > > > Have you looked into RVM?http://rvm.beginrescueend.com/rvm/basics/ > > Have you looked into hosting your new site somewhere else? Heroku is > > free for smaller sites. If you have a large data requirement you can > > use Amazon S3 for about 0.15 / GB / month. > > > HTH, > > Dan > > > On Mar 16, 2:05 am, Norbert Melzer <timmel...-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > Hi > > > > I have an app that is in rails 2.3.10 on my server, the author does not > > > develop it anymore but changes are forbidden due too licensing. On the > > other > > > Hand I am a rails 3 app that should run under the same server. > > > > They should have different subdomains, resulting in oldapp.example.comand > > > newapp.example.com. But how can I achieve this behavior? > > > > First try was to install rails 2x and 3x side by side but that is > > resulting > > > in various errormessages flooding my logs in both applications. > > > > Given is Apache 2.2 with an 3 month old passanger, ruby 1.8.x, rails > > > versions as stated above. > > > > Is there a way to have the applications work in paralel or have I to > > > backport my own app to rails 2? > > > > I have root access to the server it self, but as already said the > > > application is not under active developement any more and I cant modify > > it > > > because of the licensing. Porting it would take way to much time too. > > > > Thanks in advance > > > Norbert > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- > Jazmin-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
I am using rvm for developing already bit did not know that I could use it
for production as well. I will take a look at your link when home.
I took a look already to heroku, but as far as I could see it would get to
expensive, since I had to buy some of the plugins to make the application
reachable under my own domain. Neither the old nor the new one are allowed
to change the already existing/planned URL. For the existing one it is
obvious, the new one is going to be called via another site and the URL is
already hardcoded several times and the maintainer refuses to change that.
But I will take a deeper look into heroku options as I am already using it
for version controll backup from the github repo and a kind of
post-developement-pre-production-environment ("staging" as I have
understand
so far) without any options that I have to pay for.
Top posted from android
Am 16.03.2011 14:13 schrieb "dsadaka"
<dan-faHGhEMRMREnEVtka5Vzhw@public.gmane.org>:> Norbert,
>
> You can install multiple Ruby stacks on the same machine using RVM.
> (Ruby Version Manager) However, to run more than one version of
> Passenger, you''ll have to fire up another instance of your web
server
> and use a proxy pass. Excerpt from
> http://rvm.beginrescueend.com/integration/passenger/:
>
> Q: Can I run multiple projects under passenger with each project on a
> different ruby version?
>
> A: Not at this time. Passenger currently only supports running
it''s
> projects under *one* ruby. You can get this behavior using a proxy
> pass.
>
> I''m not sure, however, what the repercussions of running Passenger
> under one version of Ruby and a project under another. With an RVM
> based installation, Passenger is running in an isolated stack with
> it''s own gems, etc. The apache config points to that stack. Unless
> someone chimes in and shoots it down, I would think it''s worth a
try.
>
> Have you looked into RVM? http://rvm.beginrescueend.com/rvm/basics/
> Have you looked into hosting your new site somewhere else? Heroku is
> free for smaller sites. If you have a large data requirement you can
> use Amazon S3 for about 0.15 / GB / month.
>
> HTH,
> Dan
>
> On Mar 16, 2:05 am, Norbert Melzer
<timmel...-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I have an app that is in rails 2.3.10 on my server, the author does not
>> develop it anymore but changes are forbidden due too licensing. On the
other>> Hand I am a rails 3 app that should run under the same server.
>>
>> They should have different subdomains, resulting in
oldapp.example.comand
>> newapp.example.com. But how can I achieve this behavior?
>>
>> First try was to install rails 2x and 3x side by side but that is
resulting>> in various errormessages flooding my logs in both applications.
>>
>> Given is Apache 2.2 with an 3 month old passanger, ruby 1.8.x, rails
>> versions as stated above.
>>
>> Is there a way to have the applications work in paralel or have I to
>> backport my own app to rails 2?
>>
>> I have root access to the server it self, but as already said the
>> application is not under active developement any more and I cant modify
it>> because of the licensing. Porting it would take way to much time too.
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>> Norbert
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.> To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org> For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
I''m use many rubys. Passenger configured im proxy reverse for others rubys. On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Norbert Melzer <timmelzer-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>wrote:> I am using rvm for developing already bit did not know that I could use it > for production as well. I will take a look at your link when home. > > I took a look already to heroku, but as far as I could see it would get to > expensive, since I had to buy some of the plugins to make the application > reachable under my own domain. Neither the old nor the new one are allowed > to change the already existing/planned URL. For the existing one it is > obvious, the new one is going to be called via another site and the URL is > already hardcoded several times and the maintainer refuses to change that. > > But I will take a deeper look into heroku options as I am already using it > for version controll backup from the github repo and a kind of > post-developement-pre-production-environment ("staging" as I have understand > so far) without any options that I have to pay for. > > Top posted from android > > Am 16.03.2011 14:13 schrieb "dsadaka" <dan-faHGhEMRMREnEVtka5Vzhw@public.gmane.org>: > > > Norbert, > > > > You can install multiple Ruby stacks on the same machine using RVM. > > (Ruby Version Manager) However, to run more than one version of > > Passenger, you''ll have to fire up another instance of your web server > > and use a proxy pass. Excerpt from > > http://rvm.beginrescueend.com/integration/passenger/: > > > > Q: Can I run multiple projects under passenger with each project on a > > different ruby version? > > > > A: Not at this time. Passenger currently only supports running it''s > > projects under *one* ruby. You can get this behavior using a proxy > > pass. > > > > I''m not sure, however, what the repercussions of running Passenger > > under one version of Ruby and a project under another. With an RVM > > based installation, Passenger is running in an isolated stack with > > it''s own gems, etc. The apache config points to that stack. Unless > > someone chimes in and shoots it down, I would think it''s worth a try. > > > > Have you looked into RVM? http://rvm.beginrescueend.com/rvm/basics/ > > Have you looked into hosting your new site somewhere else? Heroku is > > free for smaller sites. If you have a large data requirement you can > > use Amazon S3 for about 0.15 / GB / month. > > > > HTH, > > Dan > > > > On Mar 16, 2:05 am, Norbert Melzer <timmel...-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> I have an app that is in rails 2.3.10 on my server, the author does not > >> develop it anymore but changes are forbidden due too licensing. On the > other > >> Hand I am a rails 3 app that should run under the same server. > >> > >> They should have different subdomains, resulting in oldapp.example.comand > >> newapp.example.com. But how can I achieve this behavior? > >> > >> First try was to install rails 2x and 3x side by side but that is > resulting > >> in various errormessages flooding my logs in both applications. > >> > >> Given is Apache 2.2 with an 3 month old passanger, ruby 1.8.x, rails > >> versions as stated above. > >> > >> Is there a way to have the applications work in paralel or have I to > >> backport my own app to rails 2? > >> > >> I have root access to the server it self, but as already said the > >> application is not under active developement any more and I cant modify > it > >> because of the licensing. Porting it would take way to much time too. > >> > >> Thanks in advance > >> Norbert > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. >-- Pedro Brasileiro Cardoso Junior http://www.pedrobrasileiro.com.br www.twitter.com/pedrobrasileiro -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.