what is the best practice for showing animated ajax spinner?
The usual Element.show(''spinner'') has to stick with every
form''s
:loading. Is there some easier or light-weight method?
Because I have this page that can contain upto 100 forms. And with all
of those would be 100 hidden spinners.
Please suggest something.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On 15 Apr 2008, at 14:35, Vapor .. wrote:> > what is the best practice for showing animated ajax spinner? > > The usual Element.show(''spinner'') has to stick with every form''s > :loading. Is there some easier or light-weight method? > Because I have this page that can contain upto 100 forms. And with all > of those would be 100 hidden spinners. >Depends on whether you need 1 spinner per form or a single page spinner (since in the first case if you have 100 different spinners those do have to be created somehow). You may want to have a look at Ajax.Responders (100 forms on a page doesn''t sound like a great idea) Fred> Please suggest something. > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> Depends on whether you need 1 spinner per form or a single page > spinner (since in the first case if you have 100 different spinners > those do have to be created somehow).I spinner per form.> (100 forms on a page doesn''t sound like a great idea)True, but each form just contains a single field. And is in the requirements. So have to do it anyway. I read somewhere about giving CSS class name to DOM. Class definition contains an animated gif. So you can call it from anywhere with .addClassName . I tried but didnt work properly for me. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On 15 Apr 2008, at 14:45, Vapor .. wrote:> >> Depends on whether you need 1 spinner per form or a single page >> spinner (since in the first case if you have 100 different spinners >> those do have to be created somehow). > > I spinner per form. > >> (100 forms on a page doesn''t sound like a great idea) > > True, but each form just contains a single field. And is in the > requirements. So have to do it anyway.There is such a thing as a badly designed requirement :-)> > I read somewhere about giving CSS class name to DOM. Class definition > contains an animated gif. So you can call it from anywhere with > .addClassName . I tried but didnt work properly for me.Sounds like a plan, although depending what element you call this on it might not look like you want. I''d try setting all this up on a simple test page to get the basics working and only then try and apply it to the 100 form monster. Fred --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Using classes is the way to go, because the image is only loaded once
and applied to all elements that have the class.
you can use this javascript to change a class:
onclick="Element.extend(this).addClassName(''loading'')"
make sure that applying your class looks right in the first place! the
way I''d do this is to apply that class to the element by default, then
remove it when you''ve got it looking right and put the javascript in.
also make sure that your css that applies to the class loading is
below any of the other css that applies to this element, or it will be
over ridden.
On Apr 16, 1:52 am, Frederick Cheung
<frederick.che...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:> On 15 Apr 2008, at 14:45, Vapor .. wrote:
>
>
>
> >> Depends on whether you need 1 spinner per form or a single page
> >> spinner (since in the first case if you have 100 different
spinners
> >> those do have to be created somehow).
>
> > I spinner per form.
>
> >> (100 forms on a page doesn''t sound like a great idea)
>
> > True, but each form just contains a single field. And is in the
> > requirements. So have to do it anyway.
>
> There is such a thing as a badly designed requirement :-)
>
>
>
> > I read somewhere about giving CSS class name to DOM. Class definition
> > contains an animated gif. So you can call it from anywhere with
> > .addClassName . I tried but didnt work properly for me.
>
> Sounds like a plan, although depending what element you call this on
> it might not look like you want. I''d try setting all this up on a
> simple test page to get the basics working and only then try and apply
> it to the 100 form monster.
>
> Fred
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---