Hello, DHH has just announced the release of Rails 1.1.3 http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2006/6/27/rails-1-1-3-security-fix-and-minor-fixes rails-1.1.3 activerecord-1.14.3 actionpack-1.12.2 actionmailer-1.2.2 actionwebservice-1.1.3 The announce without the repetition :) "Rails 1.1.3: Security fix and minor fixes Posted by David June 27, 2006 @ 08:07PM We''ve found and fixed a security issue with routing that could cause excess CPU usage in Rails processes when triggered by certain URLs. We strongly encourage anyone running 1.1.x to upgrade to the latest version. It''s fully backwards compatible and should serve as a small drop-in fix. If you''re running the latest Edge Rails, though, there''s no need to update. We''ve rewritten the routes functionality on edge and the new version doesn''t have this problem. To upgrade, you as always can just do: gem install rails --include-dependencies Note: This release doesn''t include any of the new CRUD/resource-based features. All of the new features we''ve been working on over the last couple of months will become available in 1.2.0, which is scheduled for "soonish". This 1.1.3 release is purely to address the security issue and another few minor fixes that were available on the STABLE branch as well." -- ? la renverse.
On 6/27/06, Jean-Fran?ois <jf.web3@gmail.com> wrote:> Hello, > > DHH has just announced the release of Rails 1.1.3 > http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2006/6/27/rails-1-1-3-security-fix-and-minor-fixes > > rails-1.1.3 > activerecord-1.14.3 > actionpack-1.12.2 > actionmailer-1.2.2 > actionwebservice-1.1.3 > > The announce without the repetition :) > > "Rails 1.1.3: Security fix and minor fixes > > Posted by David June 27, 2006 @ 08:07PM > > We''ve found and fixed a security issue with routing > that could cause excess CPU usage in Rails processes > when triggered by certain URLs. We strongly encourage > anyone running 1.1.x to upgrade to the latest version. > It''s fully backwards compatible and should serve as > a small drop-in fix. > > If you''re running the latest Edge Rails, though, there''s > no need to update. We''ve rewritten the routes functionality > on edge and the new version doesn''t have this problem. > > To upgrade, you as always can just do: > > gem install rails --include-dependencies > > Note: This release doesn''t include any of the new > CRUD/resource-based features. All of the new features > we''ve been working on over the last couple of months > will become available in 1.2.0, which is scheduled for > "soonish". This 1.1.3 release is purely to address the > security issue and another few minor fixes that were > available on the STABLE branch as well." > > > > -- > ? la renverse. > > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > > >Do we need to change the RAILS_GEM_VERSION value in environment.rb, or does that just mean the minimum gem version, so all apps will use 1.1.3?
On 6/27/06, Jean-Fran?ois <jf.web3@gmail.com> wrote:> Hello, > > DHH has just announced the release of Rails 1.1.3 > http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2006/6/27/rails-1-1-3-security-fix-and-minor-fixes > > rails-1.1.3 > activerecord-1.14.3 > actionpack-1.12.2 > actionmailer-1.2.2 > actionwebservice-1.1.3 > > The announce without the repetition :)Is this bad? I''ve never had a problem with gem before. ~ $ sudo gem install rails --include-dependencies Attempting local installation of ''rails'' Local gem file not found: rails*.gem Attempting remote installation of ''rails'' Updating Gem source index for: http://gems.rubyforge.org ERROR: While executing gem ... (ArgumentError) syntax error on line 142311, col 1175: `: RubyGems is a package management framework for Ruby. This Gem is a update for the base RubyGems software. You must have a base installation of RubyGems before this update can be applied. autorequire: default_executable: bindir: bin has_rdoc: required_ruby_version: !ruby/object:Gem::Version::Requirement requirements: - - ">" - !ruby/object:Gem::Version version: 0.0.0 platform: signing_key: cert_chain: [] authors: files: [] test_files: [] rdoc_options: [] extra_rdoc_files: [] executables: - update_rubygems extensions: requirements: dependencies: fastercsv-0.1.9: !ruby/object:Gem::Specification rubygems_version: 0.8.11 specification_version: 1 name: fastercsv version: !ruby/object:Gem::Version version: 0.1.9 date: 2006-02-27 01:00:00 -05:00 summary: FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller, and ~ $ And for reference... ~ $ gem list --local *** LOCAL GEMS *** actionmailer (1.2.1) Service layer for easy email delivery and testing. actionpack (1.12.1) Web-flow and rendering framework putting the VC in MVC. actionwebservice (1.1.2) Web service support for Action Pack. activerecord (1.14.2) Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM. activesupport (1.3.1) Support and utility classes used by the Rails framework. capistrano (1.1.0) Capistrano is a framework and utility for executing commands in parallel on multiple remote machines, via SSH. The primary goal is to simplify and automate the deployment of web applications. daemons (0.4.4) A toolkit to create and control daemons in different ways gem_plugin (0.2.1) A plugin system based only on rubygems that uses dependencies only htmltools (1.09) This is a Ruby library for building trees representing HTML structure. mongrel (0.3.13, 0.3.12.4) A small fast HTTP library and server that runs Rails, Camping, and Nitro apps. mongrel_cluster (0.2.0) Mongrel plugin that provides commands and Capistrano tasks for managing multiple Mongrel processes. needle (1.3.0) Needle is a Dependency Injection/Inversion of Control container for Ruby. It supports both type-2 (setter) and type-3 (constructor) injection. It takes advantage of the dynamic nature of Ruby to provide a rich and flexible approach to injecting dependencies. net-sftp (1.1.0) Net::SFTP is a pure-Ruby implementation of the SFTP client protocol. net-ssh (1.0.9) Net::SSH is a pure-Ruby implementation of the SSH2 client protocol. postgres (0.7.1) The extension library to access a PostgreSQL database from Ruby. rails (1.1.2) Web-application framework with template engine, control-flow layer, and ORM. rake (0.7.1) Ruby based make-like utility. RedCloth (3.0.4) RedCloth is a module for using Textile and Markdown in Ruby. Textile and Markdown are text formats. A very simple text format. Another stab at making readable text that can be converted to HTML. rubyful_soup (1.0.4) An HTML/XML parser that handles bad markup and provides tree traversal methods. sendfile (0.9.2) Ruby interface to sendfile(2) system call sources (0.0.1) This package provides download sources for remote gem installation sqlite3-ruby (1.1.0) SQLite3/Ruby is a module to allow Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database. termios (0.9.4) Termios module are simple wrapper for termios(3). It can be included into IO-family classes and can extend IO-family objects. In addition, the methods can use as module function. ~ $
James Ludlow wrote:> On 6/27/06, Jean-Fran?ois <jf.web3@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> DHH has just announced the release of Rails 1.1.3 >> http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2006/6/27/rails-1-1-3-security-fix-and-minor-fixes >> >> >> rails-1.1.3 >> activerecord-1.14.3 >> actionpack-1.12.2 >> actionmailer-1.2.2 >> actionwebservice-1.1.3 >> >> The announce without the repetition :) > > > Is this bad? I''ve never had a problem with gem before. > > > ~ $ sudo gem install rails --include-dependencies > Attempting local installation of ''rails'' > Local gem file not found: rails*.gem > Attempting remote installation of ''rails'' > Updating Gem source index for: http://gems.rubyforge.org > ERROR: While executing gem ... (ArgumentError) > syntax error on line 142311, col 1175: `: RubyGems is a package > management framework for Ruby. This Gem is a update for the base > RubyGems software. You must have a base installation of RubyGems > before this update can be applied. > autorequire: > default_executable: > bindir: bin > has_rdoc: >+1 for this error
On 6/27/06, Chris T <ctmailinglists@googlemail.com> wrote:> +1 for this error>From what I''ve seen it typically takes a while for the gems topropagate across servers... ;) -Curtis
I also received this error, and have a fix, at least on my system. :-) I did a gem cleanup and then a sudo gem install rails --include-dependencies and the installation proceeded without issue. I also then did a gem update which updated a bunch of gems to current versions (so be careful) and then a final: gem cleanup And now I''m all happy and warm inside. :-) -- -- Tom Mornini On Jun 27, 2006, at 2:58 PM, James Ludlow wrote:> On 6/27/06, Jean-Fran?ois <jf.web3@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> DHH has just announced the release of Rails 1.1.3 >> http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2006/6/27/rails-1-1-3-security-fix- >> and-minor-fixes >> >> rails-1.1.3 >> activerecord-1.14.3 >> actionpack-1.12.2 >> actionmailer-1.2.2 >> actionwebservice-1.1.3 >> >> The announce without the repetition :) > > > Is this bad? I''ve never had a problem with gem before. > > > ~ $ sudo gem install rails --include-dependencies > Attempting local installation of ''rails'' > Local gem file not found: rails*.gem > Attempting remote installation of ''rails'' > Updating Gem source index for: http://gems.rubyforge.org > ERROR: While executing gem ... (ArgumentError) > syntax error on line 142311, col 1175: `: RubyGems is a package > management framework for Ruby. This Gem is a update for the base > RubyGems software. You must have a base installation of RubyGems > before this update can be applied. > autorequire: > default_executable: > bindir: bin > has_rdoc: > required_ruby_version: !ruby/object:Gem::Version::Requirement > requirements: > - - ">" > - !ruby/object:Gem::Version > version: 0.0.0 > platform: > signing_key: > cert_chain: [] > > authors: > files: [] > > test_files: [] > > rdoc_options: [] > > extra_rdoc_files: [] > > executables: > - update_rubygems > extensions: > requirements: > dependencies: > > fastercsv-0.1.9: !ruby/object:Gem::Specification > rubygems_version: 0.8.11 > specification_version: 1 > name: fastercsv > version: !ruby/object:Gem::Version > version: 0.1.9 > date: 2006-02-27 01:00:00 -05:00 > summary: FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller, and > ~ $ > > > And for reference... > > ~ $ gem list --local > > *** LOCAL GEMS *** > > actionmailer (1.2.1) > Service layer for easy email delivery and testing. > > actionpack (1.12.1) > Web-flow and rendering framework putting the VC in MVC. > > actionwebservice (1.1.2) > Web service support for Action Pack. > > activerecord (1.14.2) > Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM. > > activesupport (1.3.1) > Support and utility classes used by the Rails framework. > > capistrano (1.1.0) > Capistrano is a framework and utility for executing commands in > parallel on multiple remote machines, via SSH. The primary goal > is to simplify and automate the deployment of web applications. > > daemons (0.4.4) > A toolkit to create and control daemons in different ways > > gem_plugin (0.2.1) > A plugin system based only on rubygems that uses dependencies only > > htmltools (1.09) > This is a Ruby library for building trees representing HTML > structure. > > mongrel (0.3.13, 0.3.12.4) > A small fast HTTP library and server that runs Rails, Camping, and > Nitro apps. > > mongrel_cluster (0.2.0) > Mongrel plugin that provides commands and Capistrano tasks for > managing multiple Mongrel processes. > > needle (1.3.0) > Needle is a Dependency Injection/Inversion of Control container for > Ruby. It supports both type-2 (setter) and type-3 (constructor) > injection. It takes advantage of the dynamic nature of Ruby to > provide a rich and flexible approach to injecting dependencies. > > net-sftp (1.1.0) > Net::SFTP is a pure-Ruby implementation of the SFTP client > protocol. > > net-ssh (1.0.9) > Net::SSH is a pure-Ruby implementation of the SSH2 client protocol. > > postgres (0.7.1) > The extension library to access a PostgreSQL database from Ruby. > > rails (1.1.2) > Web-application framework with template engine, control-flow layer, > and ORM. > > rake (0.7.1) > Ruby based make-like utility. > > RedCloth (3.0.4) > RedCloth is a module for using Textile and Markdown in Ruby. > Textile > and Markdown are text formats. A very simple text format. Another > stab at making readable text that can be converted to HTML. > > rubyful_soup (1.0.4) > An HTML/XML parser that handles bad markup and provides tree > traversal methods. > > sendfile (0.9.2) > Ruby interface to sendfile(2) system call > > sources (0.0.1) > This package provides download sources for remote gem installation > > sqlite3-ruby (1.1.0) > SQLite3/Ruby is a module to allow Ruby scripts to interface with a > SQLite3 database. > > termios (0.9.4) > Termios module are simple wrapper for termios(3). It can be > included > into IO-family classes and can extend IO-family objects. In > addition, the methods can use as module function. > ~ $ > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
Where can I find info about the "CRUD/resource-based features" that will be in 1.2.0? On 6/27/06, Jean-Fran?ois <jf.web3@gmail.com> wrote:> > Hello, > > DHH has just announced the release of Rails 1.1.3 > > http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2006/6/27/rails-1-1-3-security-fix-and-minor-fixes > > rails-1.1.3 > activerecord-1.14.3 > actionpack-1.12.2 > actionmailer-1.2.2 > actionwebservice-1.1.3 > > The announce without the repetition :) > > "Rails 1.1.3: Security fix and minor fixes > > Posted by David June 27, 2006 @ 08:07PM > > We''ve found and fixed a security issue with routing > that could cause excess CPU usage in Rails processes > when triggered by certain URLs. We strongly encourage > anyone running 1.1.x to upgrade to the latest version. > It''s fully backwards compatible and should serve as > a small drop-in fix. > > If you''re running the latest Edge Rails, though, there''s > no need to update. We''ve rewritten the routes functionality > on edge and the new version doesn''t have this problem. > > To upgrade, you as always can just do: > > gem install rails --include-dependencies > > Note: This release doesn''t include any of the new > CRUD/resource-based features. All of the new features > we''ve been working on over the last couple of months > will become available in 1.2.0, which is scheduled for > "soonish". This 1.1.3 release is purely to address the > security issue and another few minor fixes that were > available on the STABLE branch as well." > > > > -- > ? la renverse. > > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060627/ec3c71ba/attachment-0001.html
This did not fix the issue for me.> -----Original Message----- > From: rails-bounces@lists.rubyonrails.org [mailto:rails- > bounces@lists.rubyonrails.org] On Behalf Of Tom Mornini > Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 16:23 > To: rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > Subject: Re: [Rails] [ANN] 1.1.3 available. > > I also received this error, and have a fix, at > least on my system. :-) > > I did a > > gem cleanup > > and then a > > sudo gem install rails --include-dependencies > > and the installation proceeded without issue. > > I also then did a > > gem update > > which updated a bunch of gems to current versions > (so be careful) and then a final: > > gem cleanup > > And now I''m all happy and warm inside. :-) > > -- -- Tom Mornini >
From http://www.codecomments.com/archive327-2005-3-439007.html on the subject of a similar error: "Its sounds like your source cache is either corrupted or not in the format expected. Around version 0.8.5 or so we switched from a YAML based cache to a marshalled cache (with a significant increase in speed). If you run a 0.8.5 or later version of gems and then later try to go back to a pre-0.8.5 version, the earlier version is confused by the data in the cache (post 0.8.5 versions are smart enough to just toss the cache if it looks bad. To fix, just delete the source cache file (the file named ''source_cache'' in the directory reported by the ''gem env gempath'' command). If you are on a unix-like OS and the source_cache is in a protected directory, you might have another copy of the source cache available in a user owned directory (probably $HOME/.gem/source_cache). Delete that copy as well." This did fix the problem for me, even though the cause was certainly not the one mentioned above. On 28 Jun 2006, at 01:02, Daniel Thompson wrote:> This did not fix the issue for me. > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: rails-bounces@lists.rubyonrails.org [mailto:rails- >> bounces@lists.rubyonrails.org] On Behalf Of Tom Mornini >> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 16:23 >> To: rails@lists.rubyonrails.org >> Subject: Re: [Rails] [ANN] 1.1.3 available. >> >> I also received this error, and have a fix, at >> least on my system. :-) >> >> I did a >> >> gem cleanup >> >> and then a >> >> sudo gem install rails --include-dependencies >> >> and the installation proceeded without issue. >> >> I also then did a >> >> gem update >> >> which updated a bunch of gems to current versions >> (so be careful) and then a final: >> >> gem cleanup >> >> And now I''m all happy and warm inside. :-) >> >> -- -- Tom Mornini >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
Hi, all. Is any chance to see http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3811 patch in trunk. I intended to raise this question right before voting for 1.1.3 but seems that I missed it. Anyway I am doing it right now. I would like to hear any comment from rails developers. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
I''ve lost the ability to route controller modules like Admin::UserController after upgrading to 1.1.3. Switched back to 1.1.2 and it''s working fine. Think the new routing code could be buggy?? On 6/27/06, Jean-Fran?ois <jf.web3@gmail.com> wrote:> Posted by David June 27, 2006 @ 08:07PM > > We''ve found and fixed a security issue with routing > that could cause excess CPU usage in Rails processes > when triggered by certain URLs. We strongly encourage > anyone running 1.1.x to upgrade to the latest version. > It''s fully backwards compatible and should serve as > a small drop-in fix.
Tom Mornini wrote:> I also received this error, and have a fix, at > least on my system. :-) > > I did a > > gem cleanup > > and then a > > sudo gem install rails --include-dependencies > > and the installation proceeded without issue. > > I also then did a > > gem update > > which updated a bunch of gems to current versions > (so be careful) and then a final: > > gem cleanup > > And now I''m all happy and warm inside. :-) > > -- -- Tom MorniniWhat does gem cleanup actually do? When I saw this: C:\eclipse\workspace>gem cleanup Cleaning up installed gems... Attempting uninstall on rails-1.1.0 Successfully uninstalled rails version 1.1.0 Attempting uninstall on actionwebservice-1.1.0 Successfully uninstalled actionwebservice version 1.1.0 Attempting uninstall on rails-1.1.1 Successfully uninstalled rails version 1.1.1 Attempting uninstall on actionwebservice-1.1.1 Successfully uninstalled actionwebservice version 1.1.1 Attempting uninstall on rake-0.7.0 Successfully uninstalled rake version 0.7.0 Attempting uninstall on activerecord-1.14.0 ERROR: Interrupted Terminate batch job (Y/N)? Y I got nervous - would I have to reinstall all of my gems? Does cleanup just fix the list of installed gems or does it really remove them? Wes -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
OK cleanup just gets rid of old versions. Phew! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Wes Gamble wrote:> OK cleanup just gets rid of old versions. Phew!Oh well this is just great. C:\eclipse\workspace>gem install rails --include-dependencies ERROR: While executing gem ... (Gem::GemNotFoundException) Could not find rails (> 0) in the repository Um, where''s the Rails gem? WG -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
It removes non-current gems. Your system had versions of those that were deleted that were newer than the ones it removed. -- -- Tom Mornini On Jun 28, 2006, at 10:25 AM, Wes Gamble wrote:> Tom Mornini wrote: >> I also received this error, and have a fix, at >> least on my system. :-) >> >> I did a >> >> gem cleanup >> >> and then a >> >> sudo gem install rails --include-dependencies >> >> and the installation proceeded without issue. >> >> I also then did a >> >> gem update >> >> which updated a bunch of gems to current versions >> (so be careful) and then a final: >> >> gem cleanup >> >> And now I''m all happy and warm inside. :-) >> >> -- -- Tom Mornini > > > What does gem cleanup actually do? When I saw this: > > C:\eclipse\workspace>gem cleanup > Cleaning up installed gems... > Attempting uninstall on rails-1.1.0 > Successfully uninstalled rails version 1.1.0 > Attempting uninstall on actionwebservice-1.1.0 > Successfully uninstalled actionwebservice version 1.1.0 > Attempting uninstall on rails-1.1.1 > Successfully uninstalled rails version 1.1.1 > Attempting uninstall on actionwebservice-1.1.1 > Successfully uninstalled actionwebservice version 1.1.1 > Attempting uninstall on rake-0.7.0 > Successfully uninstalled rake version 0.7.0 > Attempting uninstall on activerecord-1.14.0 > ERROR: Interrupted > Terminate batch job (Y/N)? Y > > I got nervous - would I have to reinstall all of my gems? > > Does cleanup just fix the list of installed gems or does it really > remove them? > > Wes > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
Thanks for the report(s) guys. :-) This has been fixed in [4501] and you may expect another release shortly. Sorry for the breakage Nicholas Seckar On 6/28/06, Michael Genereux <mgenereu@gmail.com> wrote:> > I''ve lost the ability to route controller modules like > Admin::UserController after upgrading to 1.1.3. Switched back to > 1.1.2 and it''s working fine. Think the new routing code could be > buggy?? > > On 6/27/06, Jean-Fran?ois <jf.web3@gmail.com> wrote: > > Posted by David June 27, 2006 @ 08:07PM > > > > We''ve found and fixed a security issue with routing > > that could cause excess CPU usage in Rails processes > > when triggered by certain URLs. We strongly encourage > > anyone running 1.1.x to upgrade to the latest version. > > It''s fully backwards compatible and should serve as > > a small drop-in fix. > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060628/a6a55fc8/attachment.html
Nicholas Seckar wrote:> Thanks for the report(s) guys. :-) > > This has been fixed in [4501] and you may expect another release > shortly. > > Sorry for the breakage > Nicholas SeckarNicholas, Seems to me that this error message is misleading - there really wasn''t anything wrong with the repository, just my local version of what was in it. So maybe that error message should mention the source_cache file as a potential source of problems? Wes -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Sorry Wes, I was confused and talking about a different bug. As far as I know this error was due to a corrupted gem on the server and has been fixed by RubyForge. On 6/28/06, Wes Gamble <weyus@att.net> wrote:> > Nicholas Seckar wrote: > > Thanks for the report(s) guys. :-) > > > > This has been fixed in [4501] and you may expect another release > > shortly. > > > > Sorry for the breakage > > Nicholas Seckar > > Nicholas, > > Seems to me that this error message is misleading - there really wasn''t > anything wrong with the repository, just my local version of what was in > it. > > So maybe that error message should mention the source_cache file as a > potential source of problems? > > Wes > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060628/9fb498e3/attachment.html
> Sorry Wes, I was confused and talking about a different bug. > As far as I know this error was due to a corrupted gem > on the server and has been fixed by RubyForge.Yup, right on. Yours, Tom
On 6/28/06, Wes Gamble <weyus@att.net> wrote:> Nicholas Seckar wrote: > Nicholas, > > Seems to me that this error message is misleading - there really wasn''t > anything wrong with the repository, just my local version of what was in > it. > > So maybe that error message should mention the source_cache file as a > potential source of problems?I got the same Gem error when trying to update Rails (after updating RubyGems). Nuking the source_cache file forced a "bulk update" and it''s updating along right now. jt
On 6/28/06, John Tsombakos <johnt519@gmail.com> wrote:> I got the same Gem error when trying to update Rails (after updating > RubyGems). Nuking the source_cache file forced a "bulk update" and > it''s updating along right now. > > jt >Now I''m getting other messages while updating Rails - I didn''t get this on another system I updated: Installing ri documentation for actionpack-1.12.2... While generating documentation for actionpack-1.12.2 ... MESSAGE: Unhandled special: Special: type=17, text="SimpleXML" ... RDOC args: --ri --op /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/actionpack-1.12.2/ri --quiet lib (continuing with the rest of the installation) Installing ri documentation for actionwebservice-1.1.3... While generating documentation for actionwebservice-1.1.3 ... MESSAGE: Unhandled special: Special: type=17, text="Action" ... RDOC args: --ri --op /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/actionwebservice-1.1.3/ri --quiet lib (continuing with the rest of the installation) Maybe it''s time to remove and reinstall...
John Tsombakos wrote:> On 6/28/06, John Tsombakos <johnt519@gmail.com> wrote: >> I got the same Gem error when trying to update Rails (after updating >> RubyGems). Nuking the source_cache file forced a "bulk update" and >> it''s updating along right now. >> >> jt >> > > Now I''m getting other messages while updating Rails - I didn''t get > this on another system I updated: > > Installing ri documentation for actionpack-1.12.2... > While generating documentation for actionpack-1.12.2 > ... MESSAGE: Unhandled special: Special: type=17, text="SimpleXML" > ... RDOC args: --ri --op > /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/actionpack-1.12.2/ri --quiet lib > (continuing with the rest of the installation) > > Installing ri documentation for actionwebservice-1.1.3... > While generating documentation for actionwebservice-1.1.3 > ... MESSAGE: Unhandled special: Special: type=17, text="Action" > ... RDOC args: --ri --op > /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/actionwebservice-1.1.3/ri --quiet lib > (continuing with the rest of the installation) > > Maybe it''s time to remove and reinstall...Ack! Never seen that one before - sorry. Good luck. WG -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
On 6/28/06, Wes Gamble <weyus@att.net> wrote:> Ack! Never seen that one before - sorry. Good luck. > > WGI''m feelin'' the love :) I just did a gem uninstall rails, followed by a gem install rails --include-dependencies, and it installed without an error. Hopefully, everything is A-OK... jt
John Tsombakos wrote:> On 6/28/06, Wes Gamble <weyus@att.net> wrote: >> Ack! Never seen that one before - sorry. Good luck. >> >> WG > > I''m feelin'' the love :) > > I just did a gem uninstall rails, followed by a gem install rails > --include-dependencies, and it installed without an error. Hopefully, > everything is A-OK... > > jtLove that RubyGems and Rails update 1-2 punch :) LOL. Glad to hear it worked out... WG -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
On 6/28/06, Wes Gamble <weyus@att.net> wrote:> > Love that RubyGems and Rails update 1-2 punch :) LOL. > > Glad to hear it worked out... > > WGHm. Just tried updating on another system. I got the same RDOC errors. So I uninstalled rails again. This time I checked and it didn''t remove the action* and active* files in the /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc directory. So I removed them too, in hopes of them being rebuilt. I then did a gem install rails --include-dependencies. Rails was installed (much faster than the update ran), but the items are not in the doc directory! How do I get back up to date?? thanks, jt
Anatol, This patch is at the top of my wish list too. Let me know if you have any luck or if there is anything I can do to help. Kevin Skoglund> Hi, all. > > Is any chance to see http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3811 patch in > trunk. I intended to raise this question right before voting for 1.1.3 > but seems that I missed it. > > Anyway I am doing it right now. I would like to hear any comment from > rails developers. > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > >