Rails core - Feb 2008 - Humble suggestion to further extend r8785 (map... :as => 'something_else')

Hi,

I was very excited to see that changeset, as I thought now I could use
more concise routes for my spanish applications. However, there is a
small remaining issue: action names.

For example, if I do map.resource :user, :as => ''usuario'',
I get the
following two routes:

/usuario/new
/usuario/edit

That is weird. I want the following:

/usuario/nuevo
/usuario/editar

I could override named routes like this:

map.new_user ''usuario/nuevo'', :controller =>
''users'', :action =>
''new'', :conditions => {:method => :get}

But wouldn''t it be nice if I could do something like:

map.action :new, :as => ''nuevo''

To override the ''new'' action path on all controllers. And this
(or
something less fugly):

map.resource :user, :as => ''usuario'', :new => {:new
=> {:method
=> :get, :as => ''nuevo''}}

To override it on specific controllers.

Is this feasible?

Regards,
Ivan V.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

> Is this feasible?
We could probably remove the hard-coded ''new'' and
''edit'' and replace
them with a configuration variable in the resources code.  If you can
figure out a patch for this, please let us know.  I don''t think it
needs to be anything more advanced than:

config.action_controller.resources.path_names=
{:new=>''nouveau'',
:edit=>''modifier}

-- 
Cheers

Koz

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Thanks for the reply.

It took me a while, but I was able to cook something up:

http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/11181

Anyone interested in testing this patch?

- Ivan V.


On Feb 15, 10:47 pm, "Michael Koziarski" <mich...@koziarski.com>
wrote:
> > Is this feasible?
>
> We could probably remove the hard-coded ''new'' and
''edit'' and replace
> them with a configuration variable in the resources code.  If you can
> figure out a patch for this, please let us know.  I don''t think it
> needs to be anything more advanced than:
>
> config.action_controller.resources.path_names=
{:new=>''nouveau'',
> :edit=>''modifier}
>
> --
> Cheers
>
> Koz
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---