On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 16.10.07 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote:> 3) For all packages, either merge master into F32 or just increase the > release version and send builds to that side tag *in order*.The part that worries me is the *in order*. :-) Do we need to do bootstrap builds that are later replaced by the real builds? Because other than that it is business as usual. :-) -- Jos? Ab?lio [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
There are a few of those, but not many. On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 11:31 AM Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote:> On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 16.10.07 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > 3) For all packages, either merge master into F32 or just increase the > > release version and send builds to that side tag *in order*. > > The part that worries me is the *in order*. :-) > > Do we need to do bootstrap builds that are later replaced by the real > builds? > > Because other than that it is business as usual. :-) > -- > Jos? Ab?lio > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list > R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora >[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 16.48.53 WEST Tom Callaway wrote:> There are a few of those, but not many.Hi Tom, I noticed that for example in R-assertthat you have used the bcond: %bcond_with check would not it be better to use bootstrap instead to take advantage of: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bootstrapping I am asking for curiosity since from now on we will need to do this dance once a year for the releases that we deem worth (I would expect that to be rawhide and the latest stable). Forgive me if the question does not make sense since I am still trying to make sense of this maze. :-) -- Jos? Ab?lio