On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 20:50:57 +0000 "Ellen K" <keyes at pushyes.xyz> wrote:> From: "Ellen K" <keyes at pushyes.xyz> > To: cireyapmin at gmail.com > Subject: RE: [R-sig-Fedora] Cannot Run On The Command Line > Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 20:50:57 +0000 > X-Mailer: iPad Mail (12H143) > > Hi virgo, > > Thank you for your interest in the property listed for rent. You were > the second to contact from the ad. The first prospective renter no > longer had to move because of his home situation. So we give the > opportunity to you. We are now ready to rent with flexible terms and > just completed all new renovations. We will work with you on move in > date, lease security deposit and length. > > I know you need the precise address of the property but we do want > not to divulge the address before you are qualified. We have had a > string of break-ins, squatters and thefts at our other properties. We > want to prevent that with this property due to the renovations that > have cost plenty of money. You'll be the first to move in with the > renovations. > > All utilities are priced into the lease along with garage parking > spaces. The appliances in the kitchen and laundry room were just > installed. You have the option to choose your paint color and > flooring before your arrival > > If you want us to schedule you for a tour, then please visit the link > below and get your report. We use this site since it's it gives you 3 > scores. All you need to do is fill out the form and you get your > report We are not concerned with any negative report items, it's more > of a formality to ensure you have rental history. You can get your > report byhttp://creditlink-4.info/78a69d97893d47d6423c3e687728c0ea > > Remember, print out the report and bring it to the tour.. We'll also > waive your security deposit if we see that your rating is above 600+. > > Let me know when you have an updated version of your report. Then > I'll schedule you for a walk through. > > See you soon, > EllenHi Ellen, Yes, I may be on the wrong list, could you please give a pointer to the right one? By the way, I've looked further for the culprit and it turned out that SELinux had nothing to do with the error. It rather occurs after a Java Development Kit update followed by $ sudo R CMD javareconf The JDK is the Oracle's. $ java -version java version "1.8.0_92" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_92-b14) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.92-b14, mixed mode) Maybe I should take this to Fedora's mailing lists, but so far only R is having trouble and I thought here would be the right place to seek for some help.
Virgo, That message from "Ellen" is obviously spam and most likely a phishing attempt. As list administrator there is nothing I can do about it since they are not subscribed under that email address. Anyway, to address your question I am on FC23 and have no problem with the java JDK available from the Fedora repository (Current version 1.8.0_77). I suggest you use that and not the Oracle one. Martyn On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 07:48 +0100, virgo wrote:> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 20:50:57 +0000 > "Ellen K" <keyes at pushyes.xyz> wrote:<spam deleted>> Hi Ellen, > Yes, I may be on the wrong list, could you please give a pointer to > the > right one? > By the way, I've looked further for the culprit and it turned > out that SELinux had nothing to do with the error. It rather occurs > after a Java Development Kit update followed by? > $ sudo R CMD javareconf > > The JDK is the Oracle's. > $ java -version > java version "1.8.0_92" > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_92-b14) > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.92-b14, mixed mode) > > Maybe I should take this to Fedora's mailing lists, but so far only R > is having trouble and I thought here would be the right place to seek > for some help. > > _______________________________________________ > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list > R-SIG-Fedora at r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora-----------------------------------------------------------------------This message and its attachments are strictly confidenti...{{dropped:8}}
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 08:23:32 +0000 Martyn Plummer <plummerm at iarc.fr> wrote:> From: Martyn Plummer <plummerm at iarc.fr> > To: "cireyapmin at gmail.com" <cireyapmin at gmail.com>, > "r-sig-fedora at r-project.org" <r-sig-fedora at r-project.org> Subject: > Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Cannot Run On The Command Line Date: Thu, 21 Apr > 2016 08:23:32 +0000 > > Virgo, > > That message from "Ellen" is obviously spam and most likely a phishing > attempt. As list administrator there is nothing I can do about it > since they are not subscribed under that email address.Thanks Martyn! I hesitated to ignore it in case "Ellen K" (see <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellen_K>) were hilariously mocking my message be addressed at the wrong place.> Anyway, to address your question I am on FC23 and have no problem with > the java JDK available from the Fedora repository (Current version > 1.8.0_77). I suggest you use that and not the Oracle one.So, I just tried to switch back to OpenJDK for the sake of testing, at no avail. # alternatives --config java There are 2 programs which provide 'java'. Selection Command ----------------------------------------------- * 1 /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.77-1.b03.fc23.x86_64/jre/bin/java + 2 /usr/java/jdk1.8.0_92/jre/bin/java Enter to keep the current selection[+], or type selection number: 1 # alternatives --config javac There are 2 programs which provide 'javac'. Selection Command ----------------------------------------------- + 1 /usr/java/jdk1.8.0_92/bin/javac * 2 /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.77-1.b03.fc23.x86_64/bin/javac Enter to keep the current selection[+], or type selection number: 2 # java -version openjdk version "1.8.0_77" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_77-b03) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.77-b03, mixed mode) # printf "%s\n" "$JAVA" "$JAVA_HOME" "$JAVAC" "$JAVAH" "$JAR" /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.77-1.b03.fc23.x86_64/bin/java /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.77-1.b03.fc23.x86_64 /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.77-1.b03.fc23.x86_64/bin/javac /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.77-1.b03.fc23.x86_64/bin/javah /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.77-1.b03.fc23.x86_64/bin/jar # R CMD javareconf ... JAVA_HOME : /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.77-1.b03.fc23.x86_64 Java library path: $(JAVA_HOME)/jre/lib/amd64/server JNI cpp flags : -I$(JAVA_HOME)/include -I$(JAVA_HOME)/include/linux JNI linker flags : -L$(JAVA_HOME)/jre/lib/amd64/server -ljvm Updating Java configuration in /usr/lib64/R Done. # R --quiet>$ java -version openjdk version "1.8.0_77" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_77-b03) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.77-b03, mixed mode) $ R --quiet /usr/bin/R: line 238: /usr/lib64/R/etc/ldpaths: Permission denied The JDK is not the culprit here, and I'm at lost right now since I can't see where else to try nailing down the error. What kinf of logs should I provide to make the issue reproducible?> Martyn > > On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 07:48 +0100, virgo wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 20:50:57 +0000 > > "Ellen K" <keyes at pushyes.xyz> wrote: > > <spam deleted> > > > Hi Ellen, > > Yes, I may be on the wrong list, could you please give a pointer to > > the > > right one? > > By the way, I've looked further for the culprit and it turned > > out that SELinux had nothing to do with the error. It rather occurs > > after a Java Development Kit update followed by? > > $ sudo R CMD javareconf > > > > The JDK is the Oracle's. > > $ java -version > > java version "1.8.0_92" > > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_92-b14) > > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.92-b14, mixed mode) > > > > Maybe I should take this to Fedora's mailing lists, but so far only > > R is having trouble and I thought here would be the right place to > > seek for some help.
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 08:23:32 +0000 Martyn Plummer <plummerm at iarc.fr> wrote:> From: Martyn Plummer <plummerm at iarc.fr> > To: "cireyapmin at gmail.com" <cireyapmin at gmail.com>, > "r-sig-fedora at r-project.org" <r-sig-fedora at r-project.org> Subject: > Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Cannot Run On The Command Line Date: Thu, 21 Apr > 2016 08:23:32 +0000 > > Anyway, to address your question I am on FC23 and have no problem with > the java JDK available from the Fedora repository (Current version > 1.8.0_77). I suggest you use that and not the Oracle one. > > MartynThere isn't any issue anymore, the error was related to lack of permissions. # stat /usr/lib64/R/etc/ldpaths File: ?/usr/lib64/R/etc/ldpaths? Size: 611 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 regular file Device: fd00h/64768d Inode: 13762870 Links: 1 Access: (0600/-rw-------) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root) Context: unconfined_u:object_r:lib_t:s0 ... # chmod go+r /usr/lib64/R/etc/ldpaths $ R --quiet>I don't know how and why the root's group and others lost read access to that ldpaths file after R CMD javareconf-iguring, but at least the R session is back and that is enough for me. Sorry for the noise, if any.