R SIG Debian - May 2022 - Problem with gdal-config when installing the "chronosphere" package

Hi,

On Fri, 13 May 2022 11:13:40 +0200
Griera <griera at yandex.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am trying to install "chronosphere" or "rgdal"
package, and I get
> the error:
> 
> configure: CC: gcc 
> configure: CXX: g++ -std=gnu++11 
> checking for gdal-config... no no
> configure: error: gdal-config not found or not executable.
That would be in the libgdal-dev package:
https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bullseye&section=all&arch=any&searchon=contents&keywords=%2Fusr%2Fbin%2Fgdal-config
> But I get an error with libcharls-dev : Depends on:
> 
> libcharls2 (= 2.2.0+dfsg-2)
> 
> but it installs:
> 
> 2.2.1+dfsg-1~bpo11+1
You seem to have installed libcharls2 from the backports repository. It
should be possible to install the corresponding libcharls2-dev from
backports too by passing -t bullseye-backports to APT.

-- 
Best regards,
Ivan

Thanks a lot, Ivan,


On Fri, 13 May 2022 12:23:15 +0300
Ivan Krylov <krylov.r00t at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, 13 May 2022 11:13:40 +0200
> Griera <griera at yandex.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I am trying to install "chronosphere" or "rgdal"
package, and I get
> > the error:
> > 
> > configure: CC: gcc 
> > configure: CXX: g++ -std=gnu++11 
> > checking for gdal-config... no no
> > configure: error: gdal-config not found or not executable.
> 
> That would be in the libgdal-dev package:
>
https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bullseye&section=all&arch=any&searchon=contents&keywords=%2Fusr%2Fbin%2Fgdal-config
> 
> > But I get an error with libcharls-dev : Depends on:
> > 
> > libcharls2 (= 2.2.0+dfsg-2)
> > 
> > but it installs:
> > 
> > 2.2.1+dfsg-1~bpo11+1
> 
> You seem to have installed libcharls2 from the backports repository. It
> should be possible to install the corresponding libcharls2-dev from
> backports too by passing -t bullseye-backports to APT.
The problem is that there is no such package in bullseye-backports.

The installation of the package libcharls2-dev was done by another
package (I don't know which) and I don't want to go back to the non
backports edition in case I break some dependency that I don't
know how to solve later.

So is it likely that there is no solution?

Thank you very much and Best regards. 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Ivan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> R-SIG-Debian mailing list
> R-SIG-Debian at r-project.org
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-debian