marco.ortisi at flashcom.it
2002-Nov-09 10:25 UTC
ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action t aken.
> Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content. > > Place = openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org; ; > Sender = marco.ortisi at flashcom.it > Subject = bug on openssh 3.5p1 > Delivery Time = November 08, 2002 (Friday) 11:46:17 > Policy = Dirty Words > Action on this mail = Quarantine message > > Warning message from administrator: > Notice: A message you sent appears to have violated GE Financial Assurance > email policies for inappropriate language or content and may not have been > received by the recipient.My email was clear and there wasn't dirty words on it! I have only signaled a possible implementation bug on OpenSSH package. Regards, Marco Ortisi
Darren Tucker
2002-Nov-09 12:58 UTC
ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action t aken.
marco.ortisi at flashcom.it wrote: [content filter bounce snipped]> My email was clear and there wasn't dirty words on it! > I have only signaled a possible implementation bug on OpenSSH > package.Ignore it and please don't take it personally. The message was not from the openssh list server. It was from an individual subscriber's dumb mail filter. My guess is that the content if didn't like is "root at xxx" (I'll let you know privately if it bounces this message too!). I'm getting similar objections from someone else's filter because it doesn't like the subject of one of the threads I've posted to. -- Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au) GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4 37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69 Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience usually comes from bad judgement.
Apparently Analagous Threads
- ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action t aken.
- ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found or matched file blocki ng setting.
- [marco.ortisi@flashcom.it: Re: bug on openssh 3.5p1]
- bug on openssh 3.5p1
- [marco.ortisi@flashcom.it: Re: bug on openssh 3.5p1]