openssh unix dev - Mar 2002 - [Bug 192] monitor.c:545: undefined reference to `auth_password with USE_PAM on

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192





------- Additional Comments From mouring at eviladmin.org  2002-03-28 04:04
-------
If I understand the PAM code (none of the PRIVSEP code has been made to work 
with it right now) one should never called auth_password()  they should
be calling auth_pam_password()..

So in mm_answer_authpassword() function it should look something like this 
(untested, and unsure if any other PAM tweaks are needed), but I won't
commit
anything until someone says ya or na for it being correct.

         passwd = buffer_get_string(m, &plen);
         /* Only authenticate if the context is valid */
+#ifdef USE_PAM
+        /* Do PAM auth with password */
+        authenticated = authctxt->valid && auth_pam_password
+             (authctxt>pw,passwd);
+#else
        authenticated = authctxt->valid && auth_password(authctxt,
passwd);
+#endif
        memset(passwd, 0, strlen(passwd));
        xfree(passwd);




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192





------- Additional Comments From mouring at eviladmin.org  2002-03-28 04:11
-------
<grumble> Now I know why I don't cut and past into the comments
normally.

the correct line is:
authenticated = authctxt->valid &&
auth_pam_password(authctxt->pw,passwd);




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192





------- Additional Comments From stevesk at pobox.com  2002-03-31 06:47 -------
i will look at this.
privsep needs PAM integration, but first
let's get --with-pam working with no privsep in use.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192

stevesk at pobox.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



------- Additional Comments From stevesk at pobox.com  2002-04-02 04:07 -------
 - (stevesk) [monitor.c] PAM should work again; will *not* work with
   UsePrivilegeSeparation=yes.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.