bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2006-Mar-13 08:25 UTC
[Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set for non-interactive sessions
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #294 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Comment #10 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-03-13 19:25 ------- Created an attachment (id=1099) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1099&action=view) Tidy up patch. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2006-Mar-13 08:28 UTC
[Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set for non-interactive sessions
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Comment #11 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-03-13 19:28 ------- Oops, the patch suggested by Markus is also in bug #981 (where it's been ok'ed) and covers both this and the client side. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 981 *** ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Maybe Matching Threads
- [Bug 2124] New: TCP_NODELAY not set by sshd for non-interactive non-exec sessions
- [Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set completely for port forwarding
- [Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set completely for port forwarding
- Upstream forwarding test failure
- TCP_NODELAY always set, now?